What are the major differences or similarities between the ethos of the creation story or stories you are familiar with and the story King tells in The Truth About Stories ?
First, a note. We have learnt throughout this course the importance of telling stories correctly – once something is said, it cannot be unsaid. With this in mind, I would like to say that one of the three main stories I will present is coming to you second-hand. What I mean is, it’s a story that was passed through many people before it came upon my ears, and the details I remembered most could paint the picture differently.
So, to begin, the stories.
Ethos, by definition, is the characteristic spirit of a culture, era, or community as manifested in its beliefs and aspirations. We have all heard the creation story according to the Bible. Having grown up in a very Catholic home, it was once a practical joke amongst my sibling and I to say “And on the third day there was, …”. The next story is one that I could confidently say I have heard more than once before, but in that same breath would also have to include that I would not be able to repeat it or remember it if I tried. Kind of like a song that when someone mentions you can think of it instantly, but can’t remember how it goes. This is the story that King Tells in The Truth about Stories, the story of the woman who fell from the sky.
The third story I am familiar with was told to me in two parts. When I was 16 years old and thought I knew everything there was to know, I went to visit my sister for the first time in Denmark. She was working on a sailing ship at the time and living on a tiny-island. For context purposes, imagine a pirates-of-the-Caribbean style ship and the vast sea off the coast of Denmark and you got a pretty good picture of what that summer looked like. Prior to going I was instructed to read the entirety of We the Drowned by Carsten Jensen. It’s a very good read, although a little long. It tells the story of a village in Denmark, which is very much known as a small sailing town even to this day.
In the village where we were, there is a lighthouse, and in this lighthouse, lived a very, very old man named Sævarr. My sister wormed his way in to his favor by accident, and he ended up having a small soft spot for the very short Canadian girl who found herself living a Sailor’s life. We baked bread that day, and when it was dark out we got a bottle of rum and made our way down to the lighthouse. There was a small group of people there when we arrived, all men and one women. To paint the picture a little more, they looked very much like who you would expect to see stepping off a Viking’s ship. Everyone had brought something, we ate and then we drank, and then we were sitting around a fire outside. It was then that the old man (who’s name I will never be able to pronounce correctly) began his story. He said that it was the story that his father told him, and that his fathers father told, and so on, all the way back to the very first one of them. This is the story:
In the beginning there was only water. Then came salt and from the salt came sand, and from the sand came the land and then the trees. The gods came down and looked at the land, and said this will do. They let the animals loose and left, only to return when the world was ready. Years later, the first Scandinavians came to be and then they built their ships. They set sail to create the rest of the world. On the ship they brought with them a jar of salt, a jar of seeds and a jar filled with leaves from the first tree. First, they poured the salt to create new land. Then they planted the seeds to grow the animals, and let the leaves loose to the wind that carried their ship, and the wind gave birth to the trees. The world was created.
The purpose of telling the story in two parts is still a mystery to me, but the combination of events still left quite the impression.
Same, Same, Different.
All of the stories of creation share one major theme: first there was nothing and then there was something. Each story was unique in its telling, but I found that all had similar items. There’s an aspect of nature to be accounted for, and animals too. The Sailors story and the King story both talk of the land being created by something, salt and sand in the former and dirt in the latter.
What was most interesting to me about the two-part story was that in the Jensen book, they speak of Christianity. The famous first line in the novel goes like this: “Many years ago there lived a man called Laurids Madsen, who went up to Heaven and came down again, thanks to his boots” (Jensen, 1). Even then, throughout the novel religion is mocked for its callousness towards the worshippers, and the contradictory teachings in scripture. The second part of the story is the part deserving of more focus for the context of this course. The way the story was presented was in a similar tone to that of King’s story about Charm and her twins. Each piece was told the way the story should make the reader feel. On the contrary, the genesis story is very cold, it does not embrace the reader. I have found many bible stories to be like this, which I believe is largely in part to the language used to tell them.
In looking at comparing the stories of creation, I also noticed something I found rather striking. The genesis story is so common not only due to the very large and very loud presence of the Catholic and Christian religions, but also because it is in the bible. The bible is a written account of what had happened. However, the story King tells, as well as the sailor story, are both based on oral traditions. As King would say: each time someone tells the story, it changes (1). Similar to the Indigenous peoples in Canada, Danes (especially in Greenland) rely on Oral Traditions to tell their histories.
There are many more creation stories, all possessing similarities and differences. I do not believe that any one story is more true than another, however I can respect that it is not my place to tell someone that what they believe is false (even if it means listening to my Great-Aunt tell me for the hundredth thousand time that God created the world in his image. For context, she’s a nun.)
Works Cited
Colville, Liz, and Carsten Jensen. “Dive Into A Danish Tale Of Seafarers And Dreamers.” NPR, NPR, 23 Feb. 2011, www.npr.org/2011/07/14/133964690/dive-into-a-danish-tale-of-seafarers-and-dreamers.
Thisted, Kirsten. “On Narrative Expectations: Greenlandic Oral Traditions about the Cultural Encounter between Inuit and Norsemen.” Scandinavian Studies, vol. 73, no. 3, 2001, pp. 253–296. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/40920318. Accessed 12 Mar. 2020.
King, Thomas. “The Truth about Stories: A Native Narrative.” 2003
zhanna kutlimetova
March 13, 2020 — 8:41 pm
Hi Nicole,
Thank you for sharing your reflections on different creations stories and personal experiences. In your post you point out that the bible is written account, while King’s story and the sailor story are based on oral traditions. What if we look at Genesis from a different perspective? In Genesis, the means that God used to create the world was his Word: “God said: Let there be…”. Do you think that in this context we can consider Genesis as being based on the oral traditions as well?
Thank you, Joanne
NicoleDiaz
March 29, 2020 — 11:46 am
Hey Joanne! Thank you for your insight to this — i’ve never actually thought about it that way. When hearing the “word of God”, it has always been presented to me from someone reading about it. At church, the priest would read from the bible, or quote scripture, or even interpret what was meant by what has been written. To me, it has always been about the writings in a book (the bible). Interestingly, the bible was originally written in Hebrew, and then translated to other languages. There was even a period of time in England where translating the bible was forbidden, and as only the most esteemed academics and clergymen knew how to read latin, and therefor they were responsible for sharing the readings. (whether or not any of them gave fully factual or legitimate interpretations, we will not know). It is interesting to think about in this way, because much like Oral traditions can change depending on who is telling them, perhaps the stories of the Bible (maybe even the Genesis story) have also changed in a similar way through the different translations. So, with all that being said, I do think that we could think of Genesis as an Oral tradition, to a certain extent.
I’ve enjoyed corresponding with you throughout this course, thank you for all of your insightful comments!!
Nicole
Samantha
March 14, 2020 — 12:54 pm
Hi Nicole,
Great post! I really enjoyed reading your personal story on creation stories you’re familiar with, and it poses the notion that there are so many different renditions of how the world came to be. You mention that the sailors’ story and King’s story of creation are similar in terms of both stemming from an oral tradition versus the written account in Genesis. As well, land is formed by some kind of element, which is an interesting point to consider.
You say that you don’t believe one creation story to be truer than the other, so then would you say your idea of creation does not reflect one story over the other? I find that being raised in a religious household, as I was also raised Catholic, your perspective on things is heavily weighed by your parents and family, as is the case with many other things. How do you think this is reflected in society’s views of creation stories, oral versus written? To what extent does influence have on shaping a culture?
NicoleDiaz
March 29, 2020 — 11:38 am
Hey Samantha! Thank you for leaving a comment 🙂
Okay so, your first question. My idea of creation is complicated, because while I don’t believe any one story to be more true than another, it does not mean that they all don’t have some aspect I subscribe to. It’s like a simultaneous mashup of sorts, and when you take in to account the scientific explanation for the origin of the universe then every idea contradicts themselves. To move along, I believe that every generation is heavily influenced by their parent generation. We all learn things that we do and don’t believe in, and eventually it becomes our responsibility to decide what we think is true or not. I also think that how we think is very much influenced by how we were raised. I touched on this briefly in another blog, but in principle I have read many research papers that claim that the way we’re raised and how we are taught to process information will heavily affect how we perceive the world. To that extent, there is a huge impact on shaping a culture. At its core, cultures are different because they represent groups of people with distinct languages, values, customs and traditions. The use, or lack thereof, of oral traditions plays a big role in this. The thesaurus example of an oral tradition sates that it is “a community’s cultural and historical traditions passed down by word of mouth or example from one generation to another without written instruction.” So, by definition, oral traditions shape a culture, as well as differentiate one culture from a next.
SashiniWeerasundara
March 14, 2020 — 8:16 pm
Thank you for your post, I really did enjoy reading it. However you mentioned that the Genesis story is a written tradition and is cold while the story you told and the Earth Diver Story are oral traditions. Does changing the story through oral tradition cause stories to become better? Or in other words, what do you think in oral tradition causes stories to embrace the reader? And what context of language do you think in the Genesis gives it a very cold and loud presence?
NicoleDiaz
March 29, 2020 — 11:14 am
Hello! Thank you for your comment 🙂 I will do my best to address each part of your questions. While I cannot say with absolute certainty that all stories that are changed through Oral Tradition become better, it has been my experience that they leave more of an impact. The beauty of a story being told from one person to another, in my opinion, is that the story can take the shape that the narrator gives it. I would imagine that the story I heard for the Lighthouse man was seldom told in English, and it is quite possible that changing the language from Danish to English would have changed something in it. There are certain words, feelings and expressions that will never translate between languages, so the intent could end up being different. I have always found the Genesis story to be cold, having heard it countless times in Sunday school and throughout highschool as well. The Genesis story is the beginning of a book that seeks to explain every part of the universe. In every version that I’ve heard, whether it be from reading a book or hearing it preached, it has always come across as factual. “This is how it happened” — there was no magic in it, no room for any wonder. I think that language is very important, the words we use have a very big impact on how we tell the stories we share.
Steph
April 19, 2020 — 5:06 pm
Hi Nicole,
Thank you for your insightful blog post! When I was considering the likeness in creation stories I also noticed how common the Genesis story is. I simply attributed it to colonialism but after reading your post I realized I missed a very important point – the bible is written. This presented a simpler and quicker method of spreading scripture between people and cementing it as a part of the world we live in. With the way that the internet works, it is far easier to share media. Do you think sharing stories through audio files will change the way the story is told and affect the meaning?
ClaireTaylor
April 20, 2020 — 9:09 pm
Hi Nicole!
I really enjoyed reading your blog post, it was very insightful! I found it especially interesting coming from someone who grew up in a very religious household and to see your perspective! I thought your point about the bible being so well known because it was written was very interesting! However, there are many other creation stories that are written. Do you think the bible (Genesis) is most commonly known here because it was written or because of culture and colonialism? Do you think it’s the same in other places of the world or simply that the bible is extremely well known almost everywhere?