Measuring Democracy

Entries Tagged as 'Democracy in the News'

The Internet and China

January 22nd, 2011 · No Comments

An area I know little about: China. I am pretty unclear as to how things work over there, other than the fact that it is NOT democratic, human rights are at times infringed upon, and that Chinese officials are stubborn as hell when it comes to exchange rate policy.

But a topic I am MOST interested in is the potential that the internet has on influencing and strengthening the public, all around the world, in all types of regimes. I mean to say, the internet can facilitate the government’s accountable to the public in democracies, just as in un-democratic countries it can help the people share information and mobilize against oppressive regimes.

In Nicholas Kristof’s article, Banned in Beijing, the author confronts the problems of internet censorship within Chinese borders.Imagine: you fly in to China, find some wifi, and can not sign on to Facebook. Devastation and withdrawal systems follow. But for the average Chinese internet surfer (there are 450 million of them) they know no Facebook, as the government has blocked it completely.

In China, any website, be it a blog, “microblog” or online community that posts negative material about the Chinese government is “harmonized”, to use Chinese terminology. That means internet moderators block the website or negative political content in order to bring harmony to society. In Facebook’s case, they know how easy it would be for people to log on and share harsh criticism with a vast network of citizens from across the land.

If you want to speak out against Chinese government within China, and your blog or statement draws enough public attention, it’s going to get shut down, just as Kristof’s microblog did. Officials simply don’t want to risk the possibility of people joining together over computer networks, as that may jeopardize the legitimacy of the government. If more citizen’s were aware of problems facing other countrymen in other regions of China, perhaps there would be a greater national movement to overthrow the current government in China.

The internet, and the resources it allows people to access almost instantly, will seriously shape the political arena in years to come. This article was a great example, first hand, of how internet censorship takes place, and the consequences that result from the lack of open and free information. If the internet allows more people to see the realities of the way their governing officials operate, it allows for the opportunity, or at least the desire, for change in government. Just as in the US, the internet has allowed us to hold our leaders more accountable, in China, it may just have the ability to help bring down a suppressive Chinese government.

Tags: Democracy in the News

The Shooting in Tucson: Why we shouldn’t blame anyone

January 17th, 2011 · No Comments

Jared Loughner’s attempted murder of a US Congresswoman two weeks ago is old news at this point (the front page of the New York Times this morning was something about Steve Jobs). But I feel like this tragic event points to some causes for alarm within American democracy.

The main argument submitted by the left is that the intense and bipolar political discourse caused the shooting. The Economist takes on the issue in their recent article, The Tucson shootings: The Blame Game. The author is quick to admit American politics is heated, perhaps more so than ever before, but then later dismisses it as just a part of American politics. To me, that is a cop out. There needs to be change in American democracy. There is no compromise, no willingness to find a middle ground to any particular debate. Congress is so bi-partisan right now that it is painful to look at the absurdity of the news everyday.

Loughner, as we now know, wasn’t driven purely out of political angst: he was insane and violent, the type of person to commit acts like this against anyone. But that should not lead us to deny the fact that the way in which American politicians interact right now is not working. Rather than the Democrats and Republicans fighting about who is to blame for the shooting, they should be talking about how they can change the political landscape so that this debate is not even necessary.

Tags: Democracy in the News