{"id":914,"date":"2006-04-13T08:13:07","date_gmt":"2006-04-13T16:13:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/peru\/2006\/04\/13\/onpe-results-for-metropolitan-lima\/"},"modified":"2006-04-13T08:13:07","modified_gmt":"2006-04-13T16:13:07","slug":"onpe-results-for-metropolitan-lima","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/peru\/2006\/04\/13\/onpe-results-for-metropolitan-lima\/","title":{"rendered":"ONPE Results for Metropolitan Lima"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"resultadoslima.jpg\"
\nSource: La Rep\u00fablica<\/a>, 13 de abril del 2006
\nNote:<\/strong> at the time of this posting ONPE<\/a> published results for Lima at 88.07 percent. Although La Republica states that the data on which this table is based are results at 100 percent, we do not believe this can be right for two reasons. First, there are voting booths in Lima where the results have been challenged and it will be days before these results are known. Second, votes abroad are added to the results for Lima. Hence, final results for Lima have not been published.
\nNevertheless, this table shows how the spatial distribution of the vote for UPP, UN and ARPA maps onto the class structure of the city. UN is strongest in the affluent districts of Lima, UPP in the shantytowns. UN won strong majorities in the wealthier parts of Lima. Flores captured 65 percent of the vote in Miraflores, 71 percent in San Isidro, the two richest districts. UN also won majorities in solid middle class districts like San Borja (63 percent), Jes\u00fas Mar\u00eda (53 percent), Lince (51 percent), and Pueblo Libre (55 percent). She also did impressively–at least in historical comparative terms, for a right-wing candidate–in San Juan de Miraflores (31 percent), and Villa Mar\u00eda del Triunfo (28 percent).
\nUPP won pluralities in the poorest districts. Humala captured 31 percent in San Juan de Lurigancho, 30 percent in Independencia, 29 percent in Villa El Salvador and in Comas. He also did well in Ate (31 percent), El Agustino (31 percent), Lurigancho (28 percent), Pachac\u00e1mac (29 percent). APRA did better than UPP in established working class and middle class districts, but nowhere did it win a plurality (though it might barely edge out Flores in Callao).<\/p>\n


\nLima, la fortaleza de Lourdes<\/a>
\nPor Carolina Martin
\nLa Rep\u00fablica, 13 de abril del 2006<\/strong>
\nELLA MANDA
\n\u2022 Candidata de Unidad Nacional ir\u00eda ganando en 32 distritos, algunos pujantes y otros populosos
\n\u2022 Ollanta Humala habr\u00eda conseguido vencer en 11 distritos, y Alan Garc\u00eda le arrebatar\u00eda, por cent\u00e9simas, el Callao a su contendora Lourdes Flores.
\nSiempre reivindic\u00f3 la capital como su estandarte, y Lourdes Flores no se equivoc\u00f3. Seg\u00fan los \u00faltimos datos de la ONPE, el 34.304% de los votos escrutados eran para la candidata de Unidad Nacional, seguida por Ollanta Humala, con un 23.667 %, y por Alan Garc\u00eda con un 21.797 %.
\nEso supone treinta y dos de los cuarenta y tres distritos en los que se divide Lima (74,4% del territorio), que votaron mayoritariamente a la candidata de UN. El resto lo hicieron por el postulante de UPP, y tan solo la provincia constitucional del Callao se decant\u00f3 finalmente (por muy poco, en un fiel reflejo de la votaci\u00f3n nacional) por el candidato del Partido Aprista.
\nAl contrario de lo que se le acus\u00f3 durante toda la campa\u00f1a, adem\u00e1s, la lideresa de Unidad Nacional no solo venci\u00f3 en los distritos con un mayor estatus econ\u00f3mico, sino tambi\u00e9n en aquellos considerados m\u00e1s populares.
\nAs\u00ed, Flores Nano gan\u00f3 en Cieneguilla (35,163%), La Molina (59,837%), Los Olivos (33,756%), Magdalena del Mar (52,432%), Miraflores (64,941%), Barranco (49,309%), San Isidro (71,265%), San Borja (63,462%), Santiago de Surco (57,130%) y Surquillo (44,366%).
\nPero tambi\u00e9n lo hizo en distritos como Jes\u00fas Mar\u00eda (52,639%), La Victoria (35,411%), Lince (51,097%), Pueblo Libre (54,892%), San Juan de Miraflores (30,738%), San Luis (40,684%), San Miguel (53,015%), Santa Mar\u00eda del Mar (64,667%) y Villa Mar\u00eda del Triunfo (27,835%), entre otros.
\nOllanta Humala y Uni\u00f3n por el Per\u00fa, por su parte, se hicieron con los distritos de Ate (31,077%), Carabayllo (31,831%), Comas (28,812%), El Agustino (31,021%), Independencia (29,582%), Lurigancho (27,816%), Pachac\u00e1mac (28,654%), Puente Piedra (31,942%), San Juan de Lurigancho (30,805%) y Villa El Salvador (27,835%).
\nAlan Garc\u00eda, eso s\u00ed (y al cierre de esta edici\u00f3n) se hab\u00eda hecho por apenas unas cent\u00e9simas con la provincia constitucional del Callao. All\u00ed el Apra ten\u00eda 30,783% de los votos escrutados, mientras que Unidad Nacional contaba con 30,194. La ONPE consign\u00f3 en la capital 2 mil 844 actas observadas.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Source: La Rep\u00fablica, 13 de abril del 2006 Note: at the time of this posting ONPE published results for Lima at 88.07 percent. Although La Republica states that the data on which this table is based are results at 100 percent, we do not believe this can be right for two reasons. First, there are […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1305,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7950,7949],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-914","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-electoral-system","category-polls-results"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/peru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/914","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/peru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/peru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/peru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1305"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/peru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=914"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/peru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/914\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/peru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=914"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/peru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=914"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/peru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=914"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}