Assignment #4

Here is the link the my site:

 http://weslibrarymediacentre.weebly.com

 

Design Sheet For Winchelsea Elementary Library Media Centre

 

Home Research Create Pathfinders Students Teachers Blog
Link

Catalogue

Databases

World Book

EBSCO

Know BC

Glogster

Pixton

Weebly

Ms. Knight Rm 9 Book Reviews Links

DRC

TED talks

Web 2.0 Tutorials

Video

 

 

 
New Books Search Engines

KidsClick

Dibdabdoo

    Book Trailers Educational Blogs

Culture of Yes.

Read, Write, Connect & Learn.

Powerful Learning Practice.

 

 
What’s New Bibliograpghy

Kid Bib Toolkit

    World News

BBC

Time

Nat Geo

iPads

5 mistakes.

Teach with.

1 Ipad.

Apps.

 
Books Online            
             
             

 

 

Legend

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

 

Reflection

After working the complexities of the School website for the last assignment, I was clear in my mind that I wanted to create a user-friendly interactive website with a clear and colourful design that appealed to students at the elementary level.

Working at a site where the library that falls below the standards set out in a lot of areas as described in Achieving Information Literacy: Standards for School Library Programs in Canada (2006), I felt it was important to attempt to create some sense of learning commons within a virtual presence. I believe that collaboration amongst all users (students, staff, Administrator, parents etc.) will deepen a sense of ownership and help to continue to define this virtual space. The school has never created a virtual space and I felt it was important to keep everything as simple as possible. I chose to work on within a flat hierarchy that was to be no more than 3 levels deep. I found the drop down menu in the school website was something that I wanted to incorporate into my design. I already have a class website that I had created last summer using Weebly and decided to use it again for this site.

I began with 7 Level 1 headings that I felt were clear to different aspects of the library media centre. The Home page gives clear information of staff, hours, map location and a statement from the school website about the library media centre. There is a link to the library catalogue, which is not yet activated (a future project). As I am not the TL at this point the classification system will be based on the Dewey Decimal within Alexandria which is the system used district wide. I am open to looking at another way to classify the catalogue of resources, but feel this site needs to move one step at a time to see what is the best way to approach this with all the different user groups in collaboration. Working at the elementary level I thought it important to create a new page under Home to introduce new resources to the school called New Books. The second page is ‘What’s New’ as a place to post events happening in the library media centre. I also wanted to include a separate page for access to books online.

Accessibility to the library media centre 24/7 is an important feature that the virtual space can offer and support learning from any location. The inquiry process as described at the BCTLs Points of Inquiry model is an important role of the library media centre and I chose to separate research from creating within Level 1. I decided to break Research down into three clearly defined areas: the three databases that the district subscribes to, kid friendly search engines and bibliography for the students to understand that citing is best begun during the research phase.

Although students at the elementary level may not be aware of their preferred learning style I wanted to include a simplified table of possible presentation choices. These are based on the Focus on inquiry: A teacher’s guide to implementing inquiry-based learning (p.114). Edmonton, AB: Alberta Learning. Our district has chosen to use a limited number of approved sites to help create ways to share information. I chose to include a few create sites to offer as suggestions to students.

I included a Pathfinder page with one example I have created and hope that teachers will add their own to this page.

I wanted to give the students pages that are they help to shape and create with book reviews, book trailers and accessibility to global news at their level.

I wanted to create pages for Teacher’s with useful links that did not overload, offered possible blogs to follow and information on iPads in the classroom. I included links to the district DRC and TED talks. The idea is to create one place for them to refer to and add to as we move forward together on this learning journey.

Lastly, I wanted to create a separate Blog section that everyone can be a part of and see where the discussion takes us.

I am feeling extremely excited by the positive response I received from my Administrator and library clerk to date. The TL is away but they want to get this connected to the school site as soon as possible.  I have published the site and was given permission from my Administrator for students in my class who have signed permission forms for Internet use to start adding to the blog. The Administrator saw the ease of changing the name if we are moving location and the potential to update and change the site. He wants me to introduce it to the staff at a staff meeting in May. I have offered to run a lunchtime club to create book trailers for any student who is interested. The virtual future looks exciting as we move forward into this new space for the school.

 

References

Asselin, m., Branch, J., & Oberg, D., (Eds). (2006) Achieving information literacy: Standards for School Library Programs in Canada. Ottawa, ON: Canadian School Library Association & The Association for Teacher- Librarianship in Canada.

Branch, J. L., & Oberg, D. (2004). Curriculum connections. In Focus on inquiry: A teacher’s guide to implementing inquiry-based learning (pp. 15-22). Edmonton, AB: Alberta Learning.

Loertscher, D. (2008). Flip this library: School libraries need a revolution. School Library Journal, 54(11), 46-48.

Whitenton, K. (November 10, 2013). Flat vs. deep website hierarchies. Nielsen Norman Group. Retrieved at http://www.nngroup.com/articles/flat-vs-deep-hierarchy/

Leave a Comment

Filed under Assignment #4

Website Taxonomy

Winchelsea Elementary School Website

http://www.sd69.bc.ca/school/WES/Pages/default.aspx

My Taxonomy

 

 

 

 

 

Warning:

After spending way an incredible amount of time due to complexities of this site I first wrote my Full Version Summary and decided to add a Simplified Version Summary too. Please scroll down to whichever meets your needs.

The Simplified Reflection

I chose to use my school website for this project. I realize that the school website is an aspect of the school district portal, but I am just focusing on my school site.

Initially I felt this this site was based on a flat hierarchy design with up to four levels with an overload of cross-linkages, not enough breadcrumbs and external links from different levels. Despite my regret at choosing a complex site I decided to continue this process would deepen my understanding of information architecture.

Level 0: Home

When I was not encumbered by “blind spots” as described by Kristi Hines (http://www.loop11.com/what-you-can-learn-from-popular-eye-tracking-studies/) I looked at the complete page as opposed to the two quick links I use in the bottom right hand corner.

Wow! Home is an informational overload.

I appreciate the clarity of the Level 1 headings in a navigational bar that is used consistently on all pages with a search option and drop down menus.

Below is a sea of cross- linkages some of which are repeated that add to the complexity of this site. Immersed in this page are three sections with information not displayed elsewhere. I felt it necessary to include Home in my Level 1 headings on my taxonomy to address this.

Despite the designers best intention to highlight lots of important information on this page it is too much and understandably discourages users to navigate to all levels of the website.

Level 1 &2:

There are 6 sections, three have drop down menus on the Home page. I am curious why they do not all have drop down menus? I am not impressed with this inconsistent information architecture. Under the 3 sections with drop down menus and on the left hand side of each of those sections there is a repeat of the drop down menu for easy navigation of Level 2 categories. Unfortunately, there are inconsistencies within both these menus this that appears as errors in design.   There are blank pages with only the word title on a page that appear the site is still under construction and add unnecessary information to the hierarchy. “Less is more” has not been adhered to. Some links to external sites lead to dead ends that need to be removed.

Level 3 &4:

There are sections within these Levels that contain too much complexity. To have all 24 Newsletters not listed in chronological order was perplexing at best. I was astonished to find over 50 Level 4 entries under Announcements dating back to 2009. This is in need of serious weeding. Calendar contains information back to 2009 and is understandably full of many cross linkages. This level of historical record is too complex for the purpose of this site.

Conclusion

Overall, this site is too complex and in need of weeding, updating and simplifying to make it more user friendly. It needs to address labeling, cross linkages and repetitions in a consistent format. I did like the drop down menus in the navigational bar within each page header. Ultimately I believe this site needs to return to the planning stage. I liked the Sun Microsystems Website planning that includes paper prototypes, card sorting and usability testing to ensure a useable site was created. I think the site needs to consider the purpose and users of this site to make it easier to understand for parents.

 

The Full Version Reflection

I chose to use my school website for this project as I was put off navigating past the first page after I mentioned spelling errors to the school principal who felt I “had too much time on my hands” two years ago. (They have since been corrected.) Honestly, I use the home page at school to link to my school mail and district portal for reporting. I realize that the school website is an aspect of the school district portal, but I am just focusing on my school site.

I read the following articles to help me reflect on the website:

http://www.nngroup.com/articles/flat-vs-deep-hierarchy/

http://www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-testing-1995-sun-microsystems-website/

http://www.upassoc.org/upa_publications/jus/2011august/faulkner2.html

http://www.loop11.com/what-you-can-learn-from-popular-eye-tracking-studies/

Initially I felt this this site was based on a flat hierarchy design with up to four levels with cross-linkages, not enough breadcrumbs and external links from different levels. I really became overwhelmed in the process at times and posted questions to help clarify. I did begin to regret my decision and contemplated changing my choice but decided that it would be a good opportunity to understand information architecture more. This site follows the same format used across the district. I decided to stop once a link left the website for another tab to be opened as I realized I would go on to so many links. (more about that later) The more I began to study the website the more I felt it was heading in a more deeper hierarchy.

 

Level 0: Home

When I was not encumbered by “blind spots” as described by Kristi Hines (http://www.loop11.com/what-you-can-learn-from-popular-eye-tracking-studies/) I looked at the complete page as opposed to the two quick links I use in the bottom right hand corner.

Wow! Home is an informational overload.

It has a nice clear header and navigational bar with 6 sections across the top.   Three of the sections have drop down menus for easy navigation. There is a search box in this header. This header is visible on every page. Below this, are a rotating slide show on the left side and 6 colourful tabs that cross-link to pages within the different sections. This is just the beginning of the confusion. The Community Links tab took off to a district website page. The other five stayed within this site. When I read Whitenton’s article, http://www.nngroup.com/articles/flat-vs-deep-hierarchy/

breadcrumbs (which show a link for each level of the site from the homepage to the current page) can help users orient themselves and understand the site structure.

I would agree if there were breadcrumbs for each page to help navigate at the very top. It just has Qualicum School District #69>Winchelsea Elementary School at the top. I realize that the URL addresses support the page but do not assist in navigation of the site. Then I scrolled down with some trepidation as I was beginning to realize that this site was no easy task. There are 8 blue subtitles in the same font and format that resonated with Lesson 7s description of navigational hierarchical labelling- maybe this was going to be workable.   No! This was just a ruse to confuse me, as some of these were 3 only part cross linkages (News & Announcements, Calendar and Newsletters) and 3 were leading to external links (Live Eagle Cam, Quick Links & Where are we Located), another was for signing up for electronic newsletters and the last was WES Documents that took off to new information not retrievable anywhere else on the site. It was full of cross linkages- the colourful calendar at the top, blue subtitled calendar lower down and not to mention the calendar in the drop down menu under About Winchelsea Elementary School in the top navigational bar, which were all going to exactly the same place. Is it possible to drown in cross linkages??? It certainly felt that way so I quickly dashed off to ask questions to help get clarification. To stay focused I moved on to reflect on other aspects.

I am guessing that this page is attempting to highlight the more important aspects of the site but I think it is too overwhelming and repetitive with the cross linkages. I know that this Home page is in need of simplification and reorganization. It is very easy to see why nobody navigates to other parts of the site and may miss important information. I have asked parents in the past and most say they do not use the website.

Level 1 and Level 2:

There are 6 sections, three have drop down menus on the Home page. I am curious why they do not all have drop down menus? I am not impressed with this inconsistent information architecture. Under the 3 sections with drop down menus and on the left hand side of each of those sections there is a repeat of the drop down menu for easy navigation of Level 2 categories. Unfortunately, under About Winchelsea Elementary School, the Announcements and Publications & Newletters are missing from the left hand side menu and meanwhile a new category of Classrooms is added. All of which is an added confusion. With this new addition I began to question if the website was a deeper hierarchy instead of just flat. I had not added Classrooms into my sticky taxonomy, as it was not obvious when I built my sticky picture. So I decided to add a new colour of pink, as I did not know how to include it. I placed the two pink stickies in Level 2 and 3 as I think they should go there. I feel that it was a mistake not to include Classrooms in the drop down menu. Under Programs & Services the initial page has the left hand side menu and the word title but nothing else. Likewise with Education– strange to look at blank page-the three other sections under Programs & Services do contain information. Will a person continue to check out the other pages in this section after opening two blank pages? Will they think the site has an error or is under construction? This should be addressed. Under Staff Information there are Staff Links menu on the left hand side that navigate off the website. All but one lead to different aspects of the School District site and one is to a WES Teacher Weebly account of more external links to resources. The eReporting Staff Login is a dead end whereas the others require a password to go further. I chose not include them in Level 3 as the links left the site. Under Parents the initial page has the left hand side menu and the word title but nothing else. Resources for Parents had a link to an external WES PAC page and School PAC had the same link with information about PAC. I think the Resources for Parents page could be deleted to avoid the repetition and help simplify this area. Under Resources for Students were two sub sections that were not in a drop down menu. One for links to external sites with Room 8 that reaches a dead end and need to be removed (the teacher left over a year ago).  The other Links for Students goes to an external site for more links to approved sites. This was designed to keep students on safe sites. Unfortunately when students are logged in at school the box saying Links for Students only appears as a red x and it is hard to explain to students to go there to access sites. It is another quirk of this site that could do with correcting.

 Level 3 and Level 4:

Under WES Documents that is drowning on the Home page there are 13 Level 3 documents that do provide useful information for parents. Within Newsletters & Publications there are 24 Level 3 documents that are not listed in chronological order that upsets my understanding of hierarchy with the latest being placed at the top. Within Announcements there are 4 Level 3 links- 3 being current links that are cross-linked on the Home page and each going into Level 4 with more information. Then I hesitated as I contemplated the fourth, which has the scary title of More. When I hit it I felt myself sinking into depth and time continuum. There are over 50 Level 4 links that date back to 2009. I began to include them on my taxonomy and stopped after 21. There are cross- linkages between the Level 4 documents and lots more cross-links to the Home page. I knew I had to go to Calendar and decided to be strong by only adding March Level 4 links. As previously mentioned, there are two cross-links to it on the Home page and the drop down link under About Winchelsea Elementary School. So each month of the calendar has information as far back as 2009. I took a deep breath and scrolled forward as far as 2035 (it probably continued for 100 years…)to see the blank months that lay ahead. I returned to take stock of March 2014 with Level 4 links that cross-linked to Announcements and the Home page.

Conclusion

This site is way more complex than I had expected when I chose this site. If you are reading this far then perhaps you would agree! It is in serious need of an update, spring clean and simplification to make it more user friendly. I do not believe it is necessary to maintain information on this website from previous school years. It needs to address the labelling, cross-linkages and repetitions in a consistent format.  While I see that the cross links are accurate I believe that this causes informational overload to the user. It might be helpful to have better breadcrumbs to support the cross linkages. I do like the use of drop down menus and wish they had been used consistently across the top navigational bar. I think it needs to go back to the planning stage. I liked the Sun Microsystems Website planning that includes paper prototypes, card sorting and usability testing to ensure a useable site was created. I feel that the website designers have created a complex site that is full of too much information. I think the site needs to consider the purpose and users of this site to make it easier to understand for parents. It would be nice to see an introduction to the school on the home page with more explanation on how to navigate this complex site.

Site Map

I chose to use Microsoft Word in a table format to attempt to simplify it. I used colours that matched the Taxonomy and there is a Legend underneath on page 3.

WES website Site Map LIBE 465

 

 

 

Leave a Comment

Filed under Assignment#3

FRBR

FRBR Model

 

The Work Grey Owl & The Beaver by Harper Cory
Expression Printed Book Screenplay
Manifestation Thomas Nelson & Sons Ltd 3rd Ed. 1935 Harlow: Pearson Ed with Penguin Bks 2008 VHS Collector’s Edition 1999 DVD 2011 DVD 1999
Item In my library Parksville Libraryavailable Amazon available online Amazon available online Parksville Library

available

 

Initially the choice of work was a little stumbling, as I looked to my bookshelf- J.G. Ballard- only one of expression of my title, Winnie the Pooh- too many I suddenly felt I was drowning with him singing in the background. So I settled on my 1935, 3rd edition of Grey Owl.  I knew there was a movie so that gave me two expressions.

 

As I looked back and forth at FRBR examples I found myself left with more questions than answers. Am I required to enter every edition of the book for this assignment and attempt to locate them via the Internet? If I follow the figures from lesson 3 with four boxes, then I felt constrained as I discovered DVD versions in 1999 original and collector’s editions, 2000, 2011, not to mention an import with Italian subtitles and Spanish subtitles from Latin America and another with Chinese subtitles on Amazon. So do all of these manifestations get entered into this assignment- do I do this in excel? I entered two books- my own and from the local library. I decided to enter three manifestations of the screenplay as I found one available at a nearby library and two on Amazon. I tried to get my head around Rob Styles Blog but I came away feeling a little overwhelmed. I agreed with him as this was not an intuitive process or language for me. As Rob Styles questioned whether a manifestation could be a work in it’s own right, I began to question whether my choice was two separate works of two different expressions of the work. Then I started to think about other languages and translations- would it be translated to the language in which the search is being undertaken? Or will the language of the manifestation be used? What happens in a bilingual school? Will two FRBR models need to be created?

 

When I consider the FRBR model for our school library I cannot see where there would be more than one expression of the work, only multiply copies. If those copies were different editions then possibly it could be an option. If the school library was linked through the district with other expressions, who would be responsible to compile the FRBR model diagram? How large can it become? How would it be complied into a useable format? Also I cannot see how useful it would be at an elementary level, as I had to work at remembering the language used how would the students manage? I began to appreciate some of the MARC tags and DDC that gave more information about the book to users searching for items. If the role of FRBR is to simplify the linking of different expressions of the work then in an elementary school library I think it would be easy to do within the layout and OPAC record. When I tried to locate a of the book at my local, Vancouver, Victoria, Port Hardy and Ontario public libraries all manifestations appeared some with photographs and it clearly stated the format. I do not know what cataloguing systems these libraries were using. The librarian at my local library could not help and had not heard of FRBR. I do know that I found it easy to navigate through their online search.

 

Ultimately I believe a library exists to serve all users and with this in mind it must be user friendly. I initially thought a table format might be workable but I feel that users would struggle with the vocabulary and the lack of information provided in the FRBR record.  If the role of FRBR is to link different expressions of the work, then in an elementary school library I wonder how it can be done more easily.

 

Work Cited

 

Styles, R. (2009, November 11). [Web log message]. Bringing FRBR down to Earth… Retrieved from http://dynamicorange.com/2009/11/11/bringing-frbr-down-to-earth/

Leave a Comment

Filed under Assignment #2

MARC Records

 

My attempt for Michael Fullan’s Stratosphere (2012)

010

020     978-0-13-248314-8

100     1#       $a        Fullan, Michael.

245     10       $a        Stratosphere

$b        Integrating Technology, Pedagogy, and Change Knowledge

$c        Michael Fullan

250     ##       $a        1st ed.

260     ##       $a        Don Mills, ON

$b        Pearson Canada Inc.

$c        2012

300     ##       $a        100 p.:

$c        0.5 x 22.5 x 18.6 cm

520     ##       $a

650     #0       $a        Educational Change

700

 

Reflection

Before I began this exercise I knew that I had never catalogued a book before using any format. Despite learning so much on this course I feel I am out of my depth and the image of treading water to survive comes to mind. When I discovered in my school that other colleagues were not familiar with a MARC record I knew that I was alone with this assignment not to mention this course.

As I reflected on my personal library I was tempted to draw upon one of my oldest books from 1897 but realized that there may not be many fields I could fill in. So then I chose my most recent addition of Michael Fullan’s Stratosphere (2012).

It was a very long process as I navigated between three different MARC screens in my attempts to understand the tags and sub-fields. When I looked for the Library of Congress Control Number (LCCN) on the book I could not find it. So out of frustration I decided to leave that and return to it later. I knew about ISBN numbers so it made sense for me to access my prior knowledge of books. I slowly made my way through 100 to 300 tags appreciating the complexities of  #, $, a,b,c, etc. I thought it was starting to make sense. I was making progress with new learning. I felt I could relate to the table layout with each sub-field on a new line but then I saw examples where they just ran on after each other with different use of punctuation. It was then that I felt too challenged and decided to stay with each sub-field on a different line.

Suddenly I hit 520 hard with an abrupt stop. I found some summaries that seemed too long and I was depressed. Eventually I decided to move on to 650 and I was not sure if I did it correctly. I decided that I should go to the Library of Congress to see their subject headings, and then I decided to look up the title- nothing. Why did I choose this book? So I tried the author- 55 entries but not this title- why oh why? I decided to go to UBC library and nothing there. Did Professor Cho really mean that this was not a fail/pass course? Or was he luring us into this maze of tags and sub fields?

I emailed Chris Ball at the library who explained that the last person who borrowed this book did not return it so he deleted it from the collection. Another dead end! He suggested I could borrow it from UVic. I explained that I wanted to see the MARC record for this assignment. He kindly emailed me the staff view from UVic. So now you can see the comparisons.

Without proper training I certainly can see how our school library has books entered in different ways into Alexandria. This has resulted in challenges for searching for resources. I feel I need a very long course just to enter MARC records. I can appreciate the benefits of clerks having technical training with opportunities to upgrade with new systems.

I have a deeper appreciation for cataloguers the world over and the work that they do.

 

Below is from the email that Chris Ball sent (apologies for the slight changes in format):

 

Here’s the staff view at U Vic if that helps:

 

 

Stratosphere : integrating technology, pedagogy, and change knowledge /

Bibliographic Record

 

00001084cam a2200253 a 4500

0012900869

00520140105163546.0

008120711s2012 oncac b 001 0 eng d

020__  |a 9780132483148 (pbk.)

020__  |a 0132483149 (pbk.)

035__  |a (OCoLC)798614776

040__  |a BTCTA  |b eng  |c BTCTA  |d CQF  |d YDXCP  |d AGLDB  |d OIP  |d BWX  |d WAU  |d GZQ

050_4  |a LC196  |b .F8495 2013

1001_  |a Fullan, Michael.

24510  |a Stratosphere :  |b integrating technology, pedagogy, and change knowledge /  |c Michael Fullan.

260__  |a Dons Mills, ON :  |b Pearson,  |c c2013.

300__  |a vii, 99 p. :  |b ill., port. ;  |c 23 cm.

504__  |a Includes bibliographical references and index.

5050_  |a Ch.1: The journey — Ch.2: Technology: Power and Peril — Ch.3: Pedagogy and change: essence as easy — Ch.4: Digital disappointments and dreams — Ch.5: Design principles and change knowledge — Ch.6: Making technology pay.

650_0  |a Critical pedagogy.

650_0  |a Educational change.

650_0  |a Computer-assisted instruction.

910__  |a FIN  |b NEW  |c 06 March 2013  |d mw

935__  |a (OCoLC)ocn798614776

 

 

1 Comment

Filed under Assignment #1

Hello world!

This is my second blog for the Teacher Librarian Diploma. This will be a place to document my journey through LIBE 465. I am excited to begin this course with everyone.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Introduction

Type Bookstore’s Joy of Books – YouTube

Below is a fun just under two minute video that connected me to this course as I considered organization of information. When I consider that this is only books and I begin to contemplate all the other forms of information that make up a library, accessible organization is critical. I can only imagine the time that went into making it. Enjoy!

Type Bookstore’s Joy of Books – YouTube.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Introduction