{"id":48,"date":"2023-02-09T00:52:09","date_gmt":"2023-02-09T07:52:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/pgdan\/?p=48"},"modified":"2023-02-09T12:45:14","modified_gmt":"2023-02-09T19:45:14","slug":"evaluating-a-reference-material","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/pgdan\/2023\/02\/09\/evaluating-a-reference-material\/","title":{"rendered":"Evaluating a Reference Material"},"content":{"rendered":"

Introduction<\/strong><\/p>\n

Reference sections in Library Learning Commons are an entry point of library users to the full breadth of information available in the space. Reference materials can become outdated relatively quickly however, and regular evaluation is needed to ensure that those materials continue to support the school community.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Evaluating Reference Materials<\/strong><\/p>\n

In Reference Skills for the School Librarian,\u00a0<\/em>Riedling and Houston lay out criteria for evaluating and selecting encyclopedias (2019).<\/p>\n

These are:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Accuracy;<\/li>\n
  2. Authority;<\/li>\n
  3. Currency;<\/li>\n
  4. Format;<\/li>\n
  5. Indexing;<\/li>\n
  6. Objectivity; and<\/li>\n
  7. Scope .<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    From these concepts I created a rubric to evaluate encyclopedic resources in my own library (Appendix 1<\/strong>). I used the most important criteria from Riedling\u00a0 and Houston, while also adding the category of “Accessibility,” which evaluates how easily users in each school community can access the resource. Accessibility for a specific resource will vary as each library program is unique. Each library program has their own strengths and constraints, and with differing access to technology. This category allows teacher-librarians to evaluate reference materials in their own unique contexts.<\/p>\n

    \"\"<\/p>\n

    Examples of old reference material in the Two Wolves Library.<\/p>\n

    My home library doesn’t have an extensive reference section. Most of the print encyclopedias were removed from the collection due to how dated they were. The reference I’m evaluating for this assignment is the digital encyclopedia The Canadian Encyclopedia.<\/em><\/p>\n

     <\/p>\n

    \"\"<\/p>\n

    Much of the reference material in the Two Wolves Program is too old to be of use to the school community<\/p>\n

     <\/p>\n

    The Canadian Encyclopedia<\/strong><\/p>\n

    The Canadian Encyclopedia Website<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

    The reference resource I chose to evaluate is The Canadian Encyclopedia<\/em>. The Canadian Encyclopedia <\/em>is “a free, bilingual online resource and the only established national encyclopedia of its kind in the world,” offering “the largest collection of authored, accurate and continually updated articles focused on Canada\u2019s history and culture” (Historica Canada, n.d.). It has a purported 19,000 bilingual articles.<\/p>\n

    Evaluation break-down:<\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Accuracy<\/span><\/strong>: <\/b>I checked the accuracy of The Canadian Encyclopedia\u00a0<\/em>by checking several of its articles against articles from other sources. I chose articles that were slightly contentious in order to check for possible bias. The article on Climate Change was one such example, which compared favourably with other articles, notably the one from\u00a0<\/span><\/em>Funk and Wagnalls <\/em>(Climate, 2018). Score 4\/4<\/span><\/span><\/li>\n
    2. Authority<\/span><\/strong>: The same article on Climate Change was authored by Dr. Debra Davidson, a Professor of Environmental Sociology with a PhD from the University of Wisconsin (Historica Canada, n.d.). Score 4\/4<\/li>\n
    3. Currency<\/span><\/strong>: Articles are added continuously and are upgraded regularly. Score 4\/4<\/li>\n
    4. Scope<\/span><\/strong>: The scope of this encyclopedia is somewhat limited because it relates entirely to Canadian issues, topics and history. It is most suitable for use in Social Studies courses, however Social Studies courses comprised of only 5% of the courses taught in the program in the 2021\/22 school year (TWP, 2022). Score 2\/4<\/li>\n
    5. Accessibility<\/span><\/strong>: The Canadian Encyclopedia\u00a0<\/em>lost points in this category because of the lack of student accessible internet in the Two Wolves Program generally, and more specifically, the lack of student computers in the library space. Teachers will generally print out articles for the students to use, which means it isn’t “readily accessible by the individual,” or would notify the institutional supervisor that a student needs to use a computer for research and then directly supervise the search, which means that use of the reference “requires support from staff to access.” Score 2\/4<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Overall, using the rubric I designed, I evaluated The Canadian Encyclopedia <\/em>as a satisfactory resource, with a score of 16 out of 20. The encyclopedia scored highly in the “Accuracy,” “Authority,” and “Currency” categories, but had lower scores in the “Scope” and “Accessibility” categories. Overall, The Canadian Encyclopedia\u00a0<\/em>is a fine resource, however an encyclopedia with a broader scope and more local accessibility would suit the program better.<\/p>\n

       <\/p>\n

      Upgrading the Reference<\/strong><\/p>\n

      A single-volume print encyclopedia would better meet the needs of the Two Wolves Program. Ideally, the resource would also be suited for youth between the ages of 11 to 16 and, following Riedling and Houston’s general selection guidelines for reference material (2019, pg 18),\u00a0 be cost effective. Finding an appropriate single-volume encyclopedia was a little problematic. Some resources mentioned in Reference Skills for the School Librarian <\/em>are out of print or are too specialised to meet the needs of my program. What resources remain are often suited for children younger than my clientele, or are outdated.<\/p>\n

      \"\"<\/p>\n

      The book I finally decided on is Britannica All New Kids’ Encyclopedia. <\/em>This book is geared towards a younger audience than I would prefer, but it was published in 2020, which makes it the most current single-volume encyclopedia I could find. A cursory evaluation indicates that it could receive a score of 18, which would class it as “excellent.” Also, the Britannica All New Kids’ Encyclopedia<\/em> would be complementary to The Canadian Encyclopedia<\/em>, because the Britannica All New Kids’ Encyclopedia <\/em>is strong in\u00a0 the “accessibility” and “scope” categories (where The Canadian Encyclopedia <\/em>is weakest). I will post a link to Britannica All New Kids’ Encyclopedia from my local vendor below (the costs to the school district are lower than the prices shown, $36.89 rather than $40.99).<\/em><\/p>\n

      Britannica All New Kids’ Encyclopedia <\/em>from Books and Company.<\/a><\/p>\n

       <\/p>\n

      Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n

      In conclusion, The Canadian Encyclopedia\u00a0<\/em>is a satisfactory reference resource, however it does have some limitations when used within the Two Wolves Program. Specifically, The Canadian Encyclopedia <\/em>has issues with “scope” and “accessibility.” The Britannica All New Kids’ Encyclopedia\u00a0<\/em>is strong in those categories since it has a much broader scope and would be more readily accessible to users in our program. The Britannica All New Kids’ Encyclopedia<\/em> would complement The Canadian Encyclopedia\u00a0<\/em>and should be considered for immediate inclusion in our collection.<\/p>\n

      Appendix 1<\/strong><\/p>\n

      Evaluation of a Reference Material Rubric<\/a><\/p>\n

       <\/p>\n

      References<\/strong><\/p>\n

      Climate. (2018).\u00a0Funk & Wagnalls New World Encyclopedia<\/i>, 1.<\/p>\n

      Historica Canada. (n.d.). The Canadian encyclopedia<\/i>. The Canadian Encyclopedia | Historica Canada. Retrieved February 8, 2023, from https:\/\/www.historicacanada.ca\/thecanadianencyclopedia<\/p>\n

      Riedling, A. M., & Houston, C. (2019). Reference Skills for the School Librarian: Tools and Tips<\/i> (4th ed.). Libraries Unlimited.<\/p>\n

      Two Wolves Program (TWP) (2022). Internal Statistics Report.<\/em><\/p>\n

       <\/p>\n

      <\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

      Introduction Reference sections in Library Learning Commons are an entry point of library users to the full breadth of information available in the space. Reference materials can become outdated relatively quickly however, and regular evaluation is needed to ensure that those materials continue to support the school community.   Evaluating Reference Materials In Reference Skills […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":95772,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[20,21,22,10,9,16,17,14,15,18,11,19],"class_list":["post-48","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-libe-467","tag-canadian-encyclopedia","tag-evaluating-references","tag-libraries","tag-library","tag-library-education","tag-library-learning-commons","tag-llc","tag-references","tag-school-libraries","tag-sllc","tag-teacher-librarian","tag-the-canadian-encyclopedia"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/pgdan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/pgdan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/pgdan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/pgdan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/95772"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/pgdan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=48"}],"version-history":[{"count":17,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/pgdan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":73,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/pgdan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48\/revisions\/73"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/pgdan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=48"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/pgdan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=48"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/pgdan\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=48"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}