Readings for presentation on Ralph Ellison’s Invisible Man

Hi everyone,

This week I will be presenting on Ralph Ellison’s novel Invisible Man. This is a very heavy novel, filled with powerful themes and ideas, so I found it a little difficult to narrow my analysis down to just one main idea. In spite of this I decided to go with the idea presented about social identity and conformity. In an ironical way Ellison describes how becoming an invisible man is the process of  freeing oneself  from the expectations and opinions of others, and in doing so finding one’s personal identity despite the drive to conform within a group. I found this ironical because in being individual and realizing oneself, Ellison shows how this doesn’t cause a person to stand out, as might be expected, but rather causes them to lose their social value, and thus become invisible. The excerpts I chose highlight this point made throughout the novel, and I hope they give you an insight into the main themes presented by Ellison.

I am new to Ellison’s work, so my interpretations might be a little naive, but I tried to find as much textual evidence as I could to support my topic, all I can hope is that I do his brilliant novel justice.

As a side note I wanted to point out the similarity between Ellison’s ideas and those of Camus in his book The Stranger. Both novels show men who are unable to conform to society, and who are on a journey to self realization. However, Ellison’s protagonist is continually fighting to be part of something, a social group or organization, because this is how he believes he can find his identity and purpose. On  the other hand Camus’ protagonist unknowingly exists outside of any classification because he doesn’t know how to conform to what society believes is his role and his identity. In the end both men find their meaning in freedom, or as Ellison claims, in invisibility.

prologue

epilogue  

chapter 25

Creative Project on Sartre – Isabel Salas

I chose to do my creative project in the form of a short story as I thought that was the most appropriate way to express Sartre’s ideas. I didn’t focus on the obvious idea in Sartre’s works of existence proceeds essence, as I feel there has already been so much analysis done by others on this idea. I tried expanding on the idea expressed in the character of Anny in Sartre’s work Nausea. She sees herself in terms of her past experiences, and choses not to use her freedom to choose her essence, instead letting the past define her, this is Sartre’s idea of bad faith. In my view, Sartre is attempting to demonstrate that we simply are our present selves, so we should not allow ourselves to be consumed by previous ideas of who we are and by doing so loose our freedom. I wrote it in a slightly modern and more flippant tone then Sartre uses, in order to express my idea of the character of Anny from Nausea, and also in an attempt to modernize Sartre’s tone. As you will see I took a lot of liberties with Sartre’s ideas from his works, but I hope the connections are still clear. Anyways I hope you all enjoy it!

Sorry I just noticed that the protagonist’s name appears as Nadia and as Rose once, that’s just a mistake, her name is meant to be Nadia, so please just ignore that 🙂

Upgrades