Posted by: | 7th Oct, 2008

“The Trap: What Happened to Our Dreams of Freedom?”

UBC’s Cinema Politica will be hosting an airing of this fantastic series on Tues, Oct 14.  For more information, see here.

[googlevideo]http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=404227395387111085[/googlevideo]

The Trap: What Happened to Our Dream of Freedom is a BBC documentary series by EnglishAdam Curtis, well known for other documentaries including filmmaker The Century of the Self and The Power of Nightmares. It began airing on BBC Two on 11 March 2007.

The series consists of three one-hour programmes which explore the concept and definition of freedom, specifically, “how a simplistic model of human beings as self-seeking, almost robotic, creatures led to today’s idea of freedom.”

1. “Fuck You Buddy” (11 March 2007)

In this episode, Curtis examines the rise of game theory during the Cold War and the way in which its mathematical models of human behaviour filtered into economic thought. The programme traces the development of game theory with particular reference to the work of John Nash, who believed that all humans were inherently suspicious and selfish creatures that strategised constantly. Using this as his first premise, Nash constructed logically consistent and mathematically verifiable models, for which he won the Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Sciences, commonly referred to as the Nobel Prize in Economics. He invented system games reflecting his beliefs about human behaviour, including one called “Fuck Your Buddy” (later published as “So Long Sucker”), in which the only way to win was to betray your playing partner, and it is from this game that the episode’s title is taken. These games were internally coherent and worked correctly as long as the players obeyed the ground rules that they should behave selfishly and try to outwit their opponents, but when RAND’s analysts tried the games on their own secretaries, they instead chose not to betray each other, but to cooperate every time. This did not, in the eyes of the analysts, discredit the models, but instead proved that the secretaries were unfit subjects. (link)

Leave a response

Your response:

Categories

Spam prevention powered by Akismet