Although the UN, The Arc and Social Enterprises have the common goal of making this world a better place. They are completely different from each other in their duties. This is what leads me to believe that even if the United Nations was full funded we still need the Arc and Social Enterprises. I believe we have to continue to fund all 3 programs, as it is beneficial to society.
The United Nations was established after the First World War; personally I believe their main goal is to work towards world peace and solving inequality. Due to the fact that the world is so big the UN would not be able to mange and take care of every problem. Even with all the money in the world they wouldn’t be able to do the actions the Arc and social enterprises offer. For example when reading into the trip Arc Initiative to Rwanda, I realized that they help develop the country through a business sense. As Sauder sent teachers and students to teach and help entrepreneurs from Rwanda establish a market. Social Responsibility is evident between the program at sauder and social enterprises.
Arc and Social Enterprises operate on a more business level and work in depth with communities. They work to the well being of communities in less fortunate areas. I believe in what Sauder created with Arc Initiative as it maximizes improvements in human well-being. The UN and Arc/Social Enterprises are different in the way of their actions of helping countries. This is what leads to say even if the UN was fully funded we would still need the Arc and Social Enterprises.