The recent\u00a0business news \u00a0reviewed the situation of sweatshops and Nike was referenced.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
My analysis shows that the business ethic cannot be ignored, no matter how big the company is.\u00a0<\/span>Nike is unlucky because they are\u00a0definitely\u00a0not the only one who uses sweatshops, but they are the only one who uses sweatshops and is known by everybody. However,\u00a0<\/span>Nike is lucky because they\u00a0remedied the problem and successfully got their business back. As the society progress, the public focus more on moral instructions and the power of social media becomes more vigoroso, which makes business ethic indispensable.<\/p>\n I recommend the companies which take advantages of sweatshops to give up using sweatshops. The ethical problem effect is\u00a0destroy-able, which is also hard to be forgave. The local government should not be indulgent with this behaviour, \u00a0though those companies offered job opportunities and economic effects. After all, I suggest that the public put more pressure on those companies or boycott the product produced by sweatshops. Minimizing the need of low-cost products is the most effective way to decrease the number of sweatshops from the root.<\/p>\n