Categories
Uncategorized

Bombal “The Shrouded Woman”

“The Shrouded Woman” by Bombal was a very interesting piece of literature that made me internally gasp at multiple moments. The point of view of which the story is led by the dead protagonist was a unique perspective to read in. I also found this piece to be much easier to understand, as each chapter/part focused on the relationship between different characters and Ana Maria. Throughout, the theme “love” was very evidently seen, between the various relationships portrayed and by the shrouded woman’s reminiscence. I also got the impression that some scenes sounded somewhat poem-like, this aiding in making this reading experience more entertaining.

To reflect back on some of the key scenes that stood out for me, the first one was when Ana felt remorse for not being able to recognize that Ricardo had always been a part of her, stating, “must we die in order to know certain things?” (p.176). If she had realized, it could have kept her from the long days of loneliness. I was able to emphasize with her regretful feelings, reflecting back on the past, things that I wished I knew before but could only recognize later. Another scene that made me think and feel was when Ana stated she no longer felt hatred or love towards her husband, Antonio. I think this is a very essential scene of the novel, which shows Ana’s final step in embracing her “death of living”. This part of the story made me realize once again that love and hate are very contrasting emotions, yet things that only exist because we are alive. I was also touched by Ana’s reaction to her daughter’s cry while caressing her dead body. Her motherly love, not wanting her daughter to sink into sadness, and the phrase “perhaps you will yourself die before I become exhausted and die in you” made me quite emotional. I found this to be the saddest scene.

There were also multiple scenes that made me gasp in shock. For example, I was surprised by Silvia’s sudden death. I guess this shows how irrational a person can become over love, and that just because it is love, this does not necessarily mean it is always bright, happy, or healthy. Many of the other surprises came from the plot twists that occurred, mainly due to the “affairs” of the characters. As much as I felt empathy or sorrow for the characters throughout the story, I found many of them to be highly disloyal. Despite Fred stating that Silvia is his love, I was disgusted by him admiring Maria Griselda, even admitting that he could come to admire her more than Silvia if he stayed longer. Antonio is honestly just a piece of…styrofoam (aka. unrecyclable). If he had done the MBTI personality test, it would come out as TTTT for toxic, toxic, toxic, and toxic.

To end with a question, I wonder what the phrase “The day burns hours, minutes, seconds” appearing repeatedly throughout the story signifies. Does it carry more meanings than what the words directly imply?

Categories
Uncategorized

Marcel Proust “Combray”

Marcel Proust’s “Combray” was definitely not an easy piece of literature to read, though I eventually found it to be more interesting than expected. At the beginning of the novel, I was already confused about whether he (Proust) was afraid to sleep or if it was a pleasurable activity. Overall, I believe Proust’s style of writing in this novel differed from other novels that I am more used to, making it sometimes difficult for me to follow the storyline and understand the piece. I had the impression that “Combray” was written with a lot of detailed descriptions, honestly feeling a little too excessive at times that it felt like a barrier in following the story. Although this allowed me to develop great imagery of the scenes and grasp the emotions that he was feeling, it was also distracting. For instance, Proust’s anxiety and fear during his childhood at Combray when he did not get his mother’s kiss were difficult to relate to. I completely understand that, as a child, this could be a stressful situation (depending on the age though…), but to that much extent? I’m not sure. Also, although his explanation that he did not feel happy when his mother came to comfort him (as he felt like he gained victory over her; painful experience for her) was understandable, his reaction gave me the impression that he had a disorganized (fearful-avoidant) attachment style as a child.

Part I of “Combray” was difficult to understand for reasons of Proust’s writing structure itself, but also because I could not completely understand the depth of emotions that Proust was describing in the scenes. I recognize that I do not have to relate to understand, but truthfully, throughout the novel, I was often worried that I was an apathetic being.

To be honest, I found part II of “Combray” more confusing than part I. I was simply lost more often and had more difficulty in understanding what was happening. Compared to the previous section, this part included a longer time period of Proust in Combary during multiple different occasions. This gave me a better understanding of Proust’s experience at Combray, and also provided more facts about him. For instance, part II revealed his first love, Swann’s daughter Gilberte (I thought the scene was a typical “love at first sight” moment…maybe not?), and it also revealed that Proust was interested in writing. Although I found part I to be more interesting, as it provided me with more thoughts, part II felt more important in terms of understanding Proust’s character and the meaning of Combray.

Categories
Uncategorized

RMST 202: Introduction

Hello everyone!

My name is Yuna, and I’m a fourth-year student majoring in Psychology at UBC. I come from an East Asian background but was raised in Canada my whole life, which should make me bilingual, but that’s highly questionable at this point (feels more like bye-lingual). Not to mention, literature can sometimes add on to this feeling. This is my final undergrad semester and to be completely honest, I originally decided to take this course to fulfil the literature requirement for my degree. My experience so far with literature courses have not been too fantastic due to many reasons (I actually have a strong urge to rant about this…hint: Jane Austen), but after this first week of lectures, I’m actually finding some fun in it! One worry is that I am VERY introverted and sharing my thoughts openly will be a big challenge. But oh well…I’ll get used to it. I can already feel that our class has a warm atmosphere where I could become more comfortable in sharing my thoughts, so thats a big relief.

From the first lecture this week, I remember one of the class question being “How should literature make you feel?”. This question made me a little confused, especially because of the use of the word “should”. I believe literature could make me feel in certain ways, but I never thought that I should have to feel a certain way. As mentioned in class, much literature includes a message or carries an intention of the author for readers to interpret, so does this mean that readers should be feeling a certain way? If I do not feel a certain way, it is my failure to understand the literature, is it the author’s failure to evoke that feeling, or is this just normal at times? It was a simple question, but it actually made me think for a while.

Continuing on, I’m usually drawn to non-fiction novels and more used to reading/analyzing research articles rather than “literature”. When it comes to literature, I have a preference on certain topics on certain backgrounds/cultures within specific historical periods, but aside from this small range of literature, my interest has been quite limited. To a certain degree ,this is because I feel that my understanding and engagement with literature has to be accompanied with knowledge of cultural or historical backgrounds, but my interest in this area has yet to be much extended. Therefore, I hope to gain some knowledge in the Romance-speaking world throughout this course as well.

Looking forward to an interesting semester!

Spam prevention powered by Akismet