RIM’s in motion – down

RIM (NYSE: RIMM) shares were down almost 20% after the company released its 2012 Q2 earnings report. The earnings missed analyst predictions by 9% and is down 58% from the same quarter last year.

Lower than expected demand for its older generation devices contributed to RIM’s decreased earnings and to higher amortization/depreciation expense. RIM’s balance sheet backs this up with an inventory turnover ratio for Q2 of 3.03 versus an average of 7.36 for the last four quarters.

This company based out of Waterloo, Ontario, has had a rough time this year after missing a product cycle, scrambling to get a foothold in the tablet market, having five executives leave in the last six months and having to cut 2000 jobs. As well, many concerns have been raised about its Co-CEO structure.

The outlook for RIM is uncertain as of when and if the company will make a come-back in light of the fast-paced and competitive mobile market. While the company is firmly rooted in the enterprise segment, the company should address its consumer market issues. Especially regarding its support for apps. With Google, Apple and Microsoft as competition, it is proving challenging for RIM to entice developers to its platform.

Ethics – the business of businesses?

Dodd-Frank is in the news a year after the reform, reminding us of the reason it was implemented: the role of banks in ‘08. Lets pick on Goldman Sachs.

Action: Betting against the viability of its customers.

Goldman made bets that some of its customers would decline financially. Customers including Washington Mutual, Bear Sterns and AIG did eventually go under, failures exacerbated by their bets with Goldman. This also contributed to the general downtown in the US economy.

Ethical issue: Are bets against customers which entail potential conflicts of interest by banks privy to important information ethical?

Friedman: The sole responsibility of a corporation is to turn profit within legal bounds, ethics are the business of regulators.

Freeman: By neglecting all stakeholders but financiers, the firm is in decline because it loses its customer and community support.

Fast forward to 2011: Goldman still looks like its on top. It made through the crisis and is still a leading bank with many customers. Now they’re employing lobbyists to fight Dodd Frank, citing competitiveness issues, again all in the name of profit.

Which brings the question: Are ethics alone really the responsibility of businesses or should businesses only engage in factors affecting profit?

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/19/business/dodd-frank-under-fire-a-year-later.html?scp=9&sq=dodd%20frank&st=Search