Tag Archives: Branding

YTMA …. to be continued?

Perhaps the most poignant criticism of the YMTA event could be that YouTube apparently ignored its audience when it changed the terms of its brand proposition.

The online empire built its powerbase by providing convenient on-demand content that suited the sometimes fickle, sometimes impatient and seemingly meandering viewing habits of its audience. Additionally, a great number of early viewers fled to YouTube as it seemed like a relative haven compared to the saturation of advertising and overt corporate sponsorship of conventional television.

To any of the above viewers, this event must have felt like a 90-minute gavage of self-serving experimental indulgence for YouTube, the music video “Industry” and KIA, the main corporate sponsor.

Perhaps the intent wasn’t to draw a live audience but to have some lasting video content legacy?

The YouTube MusicAwards Spotlight channel has disabled the view count for the archive of the entire show on the home page but looking at the back end statistics, as of NOV 5, 301 people had viewed it in the 48 hours since the show.

The top 4 YTMA highlight videos (the “live music videos”) captured from the performance have less than 3 Million views in the same period.

In comparison, the Official Video for Pentatonix’s Daft Punk medley has captured 1.7 M views in the first 12 hours of it being uploaded to YouTube.

From this point of view, if YTMA’s strategic goals are aligned with conventional televised music awards shows, the YTMA did not live up to expectations.

— November 28 viewership update and check in —

YTMA Show Archive – 3.7 Million views (12 K thumbs up, 6 K thumbs down)

Pentatonix’s Daft Punk has over 22 Million views.

The most highly viewed YTMA recordings:

Lady Gaga, “Dope” 15 Million views

Eminem “Rap God” 11.7 Million views

Currently, the Lady Gaga video has the highest views of any other Lady Gaga video produced in the past month but Eminem has 3 other videos posted this month that have in excess of 30 Million views each.

So, if the design of the event is to create critical viewership mass through archived content, the event sponsors may still be deliberating whether or not this was a success for them.

One thing is certain, we have seen an increasing number of conventional television viewership migrating to online, on-demand archived services but it doesn’t appear that relationship reciprocal? The “conventional” on-demand viewership does not appear to be flocking to live-streamed television-like programming.

There seems little doubt that YouTube would likely put on a YTMA in 2014 but the real questions to be answered are:

  • what should it look like in terms of format? (archive vs live feed)
  • how does it make it more relevant to its native audience?
  • how can it expand its reach to new audiences better?
  • how can it serve the needs of large format sponsors?

I spy with my little keyword tool….

I recently helped a client work on a Keyword research strategy.

Starting with a blank canvass, we wanted to start with a wide funnel and quickly find the avenues of opportunity.

Using traditional Google tools, we did some keyword analysis to find value in keyword search terms. A manual value calculation weighed the criteria of:

  • local monthly search volume
  • attainable high search ranking (i.e. reasonable chance of 1 – 3 ranking with moderate bid spend)
  • strategic value as keyword for content search/SEO

We then classified the groups in terms of:

  • GOLD – great value, focus most attention here
  • GEEN – high cost/high potential volume, spend some attention here but closely monitor these terms for future opportunity
  • ORANGE – low-cost/low strategic value, worth a gamble but not likely a great strategic choice. be cautious about wasting budget here

Keyword Search Results – Manual Triage

Additionally, we wanted to look at other avenues to explore ideas for keyword research so we elected to  perform a scan of some of the competitor’s keywords using a keyword spy tool.

This search provided some information with multiple applications in addition to looking at the keyword families that client was considering.

Our  main strategy for using this tool was to get an idea of the space that our  clients primary competitors were competing for. We also wanted find supporting evidence to validate the attention, or lack of attention, that we were directing our client to particular keyword families to find points of difference and points of parity. 

With the information supplied by the spy tool, we were also able to gain some additional spin-off insights.

We felt that we were able to hone in on some of the competitor’s weaknesses, or potentially detrimental obsessions with some particular keywords. We found this in keywords that the competitor was aggressively bidding for that had both very high Average CPC and a comparatively low competition score. (We assumed the information provided by the tool is accurate)

keyword search_volume average_cpc competition
index funds 27100 21.85 0.680588077
gold etf 18100 8.1 0.597374577
exchange traded funds 18100 18.45 0.607862996
fidelity funds 9900 14.21 0.39598438
what is a mutual fund 9900 12.14 0.411771364
closed end funds 9900 16.5 0.612896074
blackrock funds 8100 89.01 0.352148566
what is an etf 6600 9.31 0.389761302
what are mutual funds 5400 21.48 0.453429278
blackrock inc 3600 7.76 0.089042187
reit etf 3600 25.54 0.537770225
oil etf 2900 12.1 0.611248859
exchange traded fund 2900 20.9 0.375228421

Competitor Keyword Analysis

Possible explanations for this paradox are:

  • an external competitor (or small group of) was (were) trying to bid them out of the market
  • they were generating a high bounce rate with a possible mis-match between successful ads linked to unsuccessful landing pages
  • this keyword is one that the competition is willing to pay huge sums to ensure they will get 1st position

There is no doubt that this tool is useful to some extent but the real value is how one interprets and applies of the attained information as part of a greater strategy that dictates success.

In addition to the obvious uses for competitor knowledge, here are some possible tactics that one can employ by using information provided by this tool:

– Find the pressure-point keywords that a competitor cannot live without, indicted by keywords that are highly over-valued and try to bid them up. (Be careful not to be too competitive as you may inadvertently sped budget.) 

– If you are a smaller player and you want to gain awareness by association, try to make sure you end up on all AdWord searches that they do. (And potentially bid them up.)

It should be noted that tools such as this are great tactics to augment a well conceived AdWords bid strategy but they are not, in themselves, a comprehensive strategy.