Re: Iceland’s Attitude Towards The Loonie… Gets Icy

https://blogs.ubc.ca/bryanwoo/2012/09/25/icelands-attitude-towards-the-loonie-gets-icy/

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/top-business-stories/canadian-dollar-a-poor-choice-for-iceland-central-bank-says/article4564361/

I have to disagree with Bryan, I don’t think most people would find the Canadian dollar to be a “sound and viable option” when it comes to currency substitution. I almost find it odd that Iceland’s central bank would consider the Canadian dollar as their national currency.  While the Canadian dollar may be financially stable, Canada’s economy has very little interaction with the Icelandic economy. Iceland would be far better off joining the Eurozone, whose currency is backed by the European Central Bank. The stability of the euro would help eradicate the financial instability associated with the current Icelandic currency.

The referenced article also goes on to mention that there is currently a bull market for the Canadian dollar, and that many investors are betting that it will continue to grow in the future. While this may present potential profit for Iceland, they should be careful and realise that the Canadian dollar belongs to a relatively small economy and can be easily affected by other currencies in the marketplace. All of these reasons lead me to believe that Iceland is right in saying no to the Canadian dollar, and that they should look for a stronger substitute.

Image Source: http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_hggYo1TvxHs/SO-URNxgyjI/AAAAAAAACeg/i5KXNvFOVNs/s400/KRONO.jpg

Re: Why environmentalists should be open-minded about the oil sands

http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/09/why-environmentalists-should-be-open-minded-about-the-oil-sands/#more-312660

Environmentalism is an issue that has become controversial in the fields of economics and business. It runs against the basic idea of profit-maximization, which is fundamental to both of these faculties. According to this blog post, Tim Haab, an environmental economics professor, debunks the myth that the ideal level of pollution is zero pollution. I found it interesting that someone with an environmental background would take a stance that seems to oppose the conventional thought of his peers, but he justifies his points succinctly and clearly. Essentially, he states that the pollution level is optimized when the marginal benefit that the last unit of pollution provides to society is equivalent to the marginal cost of that same unit. The only catch to his explanation is that all of the externalities (the costs that members of society who don’t necessarily enjoy the benefits of the polluting act have to bear) are currently not accounted for. By implementing a tax that incorporates these externalities, Tim believes that the market will show the true net benefit to society and will adjust accordingly.

The topic of this blog post is a direct application of not only my business fundamentals class, but also my elementary microeconomics course. Because of this, and the post’s simplicity, it is an excellent read for any business student that is beginning their academic career.

Image Source: http://www.greenpeace.org/canada/Global/canada/image/2010/4/teaser/tar%20sands/Jiri%20Rezac.jpg

UrtheCast: A New Perspective of the Human Race

http://www.urthecast.com/

Urthecast is a Canadian media company that plans to mount cameras on the International Space Station which will stream high-definition video of earth online for public viewing. Their industry is brand new, nobody has undertaken such a bold venture in this field. Some may say that space-mounted cameras are too risky of an investment, and that the costs of the business will greatly exceed the revenue generated. However, the fact that it is mounted on the ISS means that the company can circumvent the large start-up costs associated with launching satellites, which makes the business proposition much more enticing.

In my opinion, one of the most interesting applications of this idea is to the field of journalism. The company is looking to license off high-profile areas to certain news agencies whenever breaking news occurs in that area. For example, UrtheCast could use its cameras to track the effects of natural disasters and then sell the video stream to the highest bidder. Live video of mass protests would also be invaluable to large news companies trying to cover political upheaval in different parts of the world.

The company has also expressed interest in integrating social media into the UrtheCast video stream. This, ideally, would allow real time news updates from social media sites (such as Twitter) to show up when the camera is viewing a specific area. Personally, I see  this as being problematic. It is very hard to filter what is on the internet, and the vast majority of what shows up on the live stream will just be useless clutter. Another issue is privacy, as many people wouldn’t like their social media posts to instantly become public.

If UrtheCast is able to overcome these issues, and is able to collect the funding needed to start streaming, then they have a creative and potentially profitable idea that could revolutionize the media industry.

Image Source: https://github.com/urthecast

Re: McDonald India’s “High-End” problems

https://blogs.ubc.ca/hardevsidhu/2012/10/07/mcdonald-indias-high-end-problems/

http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/has-mcdonalds-bitten-off-more-than-it-can-chew/488790/

I definitely agree with Hardev on this issue. Mcdonald’s India is already successful on a large scale; they have opened over  280 stores since they opened 15 years ago. Now, they are trying to improve the quality and customization of the food served, at the sacrifice of production speed. However, trying to change the tried and true business model may do more harm than good.

While the company has had success with their new “Made For You” business model in the Western world, I have difficulty believing that these gains will be possible in India. The middle class Indian’s disposable income is much lower than someone who lives in a developed country, and this means that the increased customization (and the increased price that comes with it) may not be met with open arms by consumers.

Another advantage that Mcdonald’s gives up when it switches to this new business model is the speed that the heating lamp and continuous stocking system offers to consumers. Many Indian consumers greatly value how quickly they are served when they go to a Mcdonald’s compared to other fast food chains. Without this speed of service, many time sensitive consumers will go to different stores that can meet their needs.

Mcdonald’s should avoid this change in their business model, as it eliminates too many key points of difference over its competition, which will greatly cut their sales.

Image Source: http://ascjportfolios.org/mmm/?p=493

A Revolutionary Solution for Malnutrition

http://bx.businessweek.com/social-entrepreneurship/view?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.socialenterprisebuzz.com%2F2012%2F10%2F17%2Fsprinkles-micronutrient-sachets-for-children%2F

Malnutrition is a crippling problem to the vast majority of impoverished nations across the globe. These countries are unable to provide their people balanced, nutritional diets, which results in mass starvation and suffering. Dr. Stanley Zlotkin, a research scientist and professor, has developed a solution to this devastating issue. His product, called “Sprinkles”, is a small packet filled with powder that fortifies food with key nutrients to survival, such as iron. It is cheap to produce, at just $0.035 USD, which makes it accessible to a large portion of the population. “Sprinkles” also has a long shelf like, lasting two years, making it both easy to transport and easy to store.

Dr. Stanley Zlotkin is the perfect example of a social entrepreneur. He has identified a problem plaguing society, which in this case is malnutrition, and tackled it head on. He has created a sustainable business model for his idea, which allows his product to grow exponentially and make a large positive impact on society.

He has supplied 15 million children across the globe with these nutritional packets, and continues to grow his business even further. Unfortunately, there are still roughly 600-700 million starving children across the world. Hopefully his company continues to grow, and “Sprinkles” will be able to serve the nutritional needs of every starving child in the world, and the issue of malnutrition will be solved.

Image Source: http://bx.businessweek.com/social-entrepreneurship/view?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.socialenterprisebuzz.com%2F2012%2F10%2F17%2Fsprinkles-micronutrient-sachets-for-children%2F

Security and the Business World

http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/story/2012/10/11/pol-huawei-nortel-experience.html

While I am usually a supporter of an open-bidding system for contracts, if the security of my country is at stake, I have to draw the line.

According to allegations from a former security adviser to Nortel (a Canadian telecommunication company), a Chinese company by the name of Huawei was spending years hacking into Nortel’s systems and stealing information. Huawei is the second largest telecommunication equipment company in the world, and is based in China. I believe that the allegations are likely to be true, because of the track record China has in international markets. Chinese companies have shown that they are not afraid to break laws in other countries in order to maximize profit, so I don’t think that they would second guess the opportunity of hacking a rival company to acquire trade secrets.

There are many Canadian contracts related to telecommunications that will be on the market relatively soon; one of them is to build a secure network for the federal government. I believe that Huawei should be excluded from bidding on the contract, as giving our confidential information to a company that has been shown (through evidence) to exploit security flaws would be short-sighted. Even if it saves us money on the contract in the short-term, the loss to national security has the potential to be devastating. The Canadian government should tread carefully when dealing with Huawei, and keep in mind the possible future damages of entrusting our networks to them.

Image Source: http://vdi.itgct.com/network-security/

 

What On Earth Are We Eating? – Clarity Through Marketing

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/industry-news/marketing/from-twitter-to-tv-mcdonalds-offers-answers/article4583492/

The internet is well known to be one of the largest displays of freedom of speech; anyone can say nearly anything they want. But when McDonalds’s Corp. asked their twitter followers to express their “#McDStories”, they weren’t happy with the result. However, they weren’t just going to let the slander hurt their reputation. They started a marketing campaign entitled “Our food. Your Questions” last summer encouraging McDonald’s consumers to ask any question they like about the company. This may seem like a risky endeavour, but I believe the campaign will be worth it for McDonald’s to undertake.

By allowing the consumers to ask questions, they get a full view of even the worst concerns that people may have. But they don’t necessarily have to answer every single question; in fact, they probably won’t even come close to that. Just by answering a few select questions, they can create the illusion of being a corporation that is clear in its practices to the public eye. For example, they answered one question entitled “Why does your food look different in the advertising than what it is in the store?”. While they may have to admit to painting up the food on commercials, this is something that is done throughout all of the food industry, so it is an easy concession to make. By answering the right questions, McDonald’s can seem like an honest corporation without tarnishing its brand reputation.

Image Source: http://www.bloor-yorkville.com/directory/dining-night-life.aspx?s=1076

A New Take on Gift-Giving

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/technology/facebook-launches-gift-service-ventures-into-amazons-territory/article4573963/

Facebook always seems to be the king of innovation. From ad revenue, to virtual goods sales, they seem to always be more creative, and more successful than their competition. But when it comes to a gift service, I can’t see the social networking giant earning profit.

At first glance, it seems like a great idea. The convenience of gift-giving on Facebook seems apparent; all you have to do is click on a friends name on their birthday, and press “send”. But as the article outlined, there are some inherent problems.

The biggest problem would have to be the privacy. When you send a gift to your friends, they have to enter their address on the site. Facebook has been called into question on their privacy practices before. In the article, they say that Facebook’s current methods of keeping information private are “overrated”. If anyone on the internet were able to acquire your home address through this gift-giving service, consumers would have a hard time justifying its use.

It also has competition in this field, especially from Amazon. While Facebook has strength in convenience, Amazon towers over them in infrastructure. Amazon has well-built connections in shipping and distribution, which have taken years to develop. For Facebook to come in and try to compete would be a disaster. Amazon also has a much wider choice of products, whereas Facebook is limited to products such as cupcakes and Starbucks giftcards at the moment.

While I may disagree with the profit potential of Facebook’s gift-giving and “social commerce” projects, it isn’t the first time they’ve tried something new. Maybe these creative ideas are what Facebook needs to continue growing in the social networking sector.

Image Source: http://giftfind.ca/

Catastrophic Mistake? Or Export Gold Mine?

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/pressure-mounts-on-harper-to-ease-nuclear-logjam-with-india/article4509067/

Uranium has the potential to be both a efficient energy source and a powerful weapon. Canada has the potential to to bring in billions of dollars from the uranium industry; all it needs to do is find the right buyers. Due to safety concerns, this can often seem like an unnecessarily slow process. But when it comes to dealing with countries like India, who have created nuclear weapons of mass destruction in the past, I can’t blame the Canadian government for their extra scrutiny when it comes to trade. This extra attention, however, is not to the liking of the Indian government. Ideally, Canada would like an update once a year on where their exported uranium is and how it is being used within the country. India, however, feels that this is too overbearing of the Canadian government, because India already reports to the International Atomic Energy Agency. From a western viewpoint, I see why Canada is being so firm on its safety protocols; if a foreign country were to weaponize Canadian uranium, Canada would be to blame for directly supplying nuclear terrorists.

On the other hand, I think it would be a waste if these trade proposals were fruitless. India has plans to greatly expand their nuclear sector in the next 20 years; they plan to build 40 new reactors. This is a great economic opportunity for Canada, as it would create a large, sustainable market for Canadian uranium companies looking to expand into India, such as Candu Energy and Cameco Corp. While the Canadian government should be careful, I think they should try to form some sort of compromise with the Indian government. That way, India can get the uranium they need, and Canada can enjoy the new business.

Image Source: http://www.homeofsolarenergy.com/nuclear-sign.html

Bribery in Canada – Business Ethics

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/commentary/canada-must-do-more-to-fight-bribery/article4537675/

I have to agree with the author of the article, Janet Keeping, on the issue of corruption. There are many countries competing in global markets that have public offices riddled with corruption. This drastically reduces the amount of money that goes toward health care, education, and other social services. In turn, the quality of life within the country is greatly diminished. While Canada is nowhere near this level of corruption, we always have room for improvement. Our upgrade to the “moderate enforcement” category shows that we are making progress.

While I don’t condone corruption in any form, I think that we have to be careful around this issue. Overzealous policing and bureaucracy can have as large of a negative impact as corruption does. This is because the “red tape” (eg. permits and licensing) generated by the government in order to curb corruption can seriously delay the time it takes to start a business, which can deter future investments into the industry. Too much bureaucracy can bring growth to a screeching halt, and a stagnant economy is just as bad as a corrupt one.

Image Source: http://gettingevenfaster.blogspot.ca/2012/02/bribery-works.html