Monthly Archives: January 2019

Reflecting on the interviews

On this journey to understanding how to use technology effectively to teach in a math classroom I was able to harness many viewpoints through the analysis of the class’s interview abstracts.

A similarity arising in many interviews was the use of technology to help students visualize real word applications, facilitate constructing knowledge with other learners of all levels, and save time.  More specifically, in a math classroom, a teacher may use simulations and graphing software to enhance these advantages.

The importance of transferable skills was a repeated theme throughout the various interviews.  Using technology in the classroom can help develop skills that will follow students into university, and their professional and personal adult lives.  Whether it is note-taking skills, problem solving, or troubleshooting the problems that arise while working with the technology itself; they all hold a place in everyday life. Technology can aide in a direct connection to the BC curriculum’s core competencies (Communication, Creative Thinking, Critical Thinking, Positive Personal and Cultural Identity, Personal Awareness and Responsibility, and Social Responsibility) all of which are transferable skills. A practical example of this may be students working collaboratively via G-suite which allows them to work through issues as a team which promotes responsible communication.

Many teachers have trouble with incorporating technology into their classrooms due to the lack of resources, experience, knowledge or comfort level.  Suggestions to help improve these troubles consider solutions surrounding professional development, training, utilizing cell phones and free online applications.  One suggestion that stood out to me was the idea of a “gallery walk” put on by teachers for teachers.  This is where teachers can share with other teachers applications of technology that are working in their classrooms, including implementation details.  There are plenty of teachers doing incredible things in their classes that could be shared and used in other classes.

Some teachers are using the technology themselves, which leads to a few improvements in the classroom by way of teaching efficiency and access to resources. However, the larger improvements happen when technology is in the hands of the learner.  It is important to have a clear purpose and implementation that is grounded in sound pedagogy. Something to note is that actual use of technology will not look like this at first. Technology is introduced and the lessons are refined to improve student learning.

Another important starting point is knowing our students’ familiarity with technology.  When technology and its use are not coordinated with the learner’s level of understanding the learning process itself will encounter obstacles and we risk losing the student. But, with a direct focus and cautious use of technology a student’s constructed knowledge can amplify learning objectives.

My understanding of using technology in the math classroom to teach effectively is broadening and shifting a bit.  My view has broadened to include many details that are easy to brush over or not consider such as hardware configuration, technology placement in the class, using PHET simulations to enhance visualization for real world applications, and encouraging collaboration through technology even in the math classroom.  Analysis and discussions with my classmates have started to shift my understanding to reconsider what may be some of the most important factors when an educator wants to use technology effectively to teach math.  I think that the type, age, or popularity of the technology is all secondary to having a clear purpose for the technology.  Alongside with this, it is imperative that the instruction be solid, and the technology is integrated as a means to aide and amplify learning, not to do the learning.  Overall, I think I was aware of these points before, but didn’t connect their importance to technology integration.

I hope to learn more about the practical applications of integrating technology in the math class and what that may look like at various grade levels.  It would be ideal to build a library of technology with integration tips and adaptations for various levels of learners.

Interview Transcription

Transcript Analysis
My interviewee:

– has a Bachelor of Engineering from the National University of Singapore

-has a Bachelor of Education from UBCO.

-has six years of teaching experience compiled from short term contracts.

-has taught math, science, and physics ranging from grades 8-12.

 

Current teaching context:

-middle school in Kamloops, BC

-three blocks of Math 9, two of which are daily (students who need more support and faced difficulties in Math 8) one of which is linear (every second day),

-one math 8.

To further situate this interview this teacher considers technology to be “anything that makes your life easier”.  “… I don’t know if you can count cheat sheets as technology…” Later he confirms that cheat sheets are technology because they are written on paper and “paper is technology”.

Not having a continuing job in the same school year after year, implies that the teacher does not develop the same courses year after year where technology can be experimented with and compared to its previous similar uses.

 

 

 

 

This teaching assignment can offer restrictions and advantages to implementing technology. The linear Math 9 demographic needs re-teaching of concrete mathematical concepts. To me these are the students that would benefit from engaging in online tutorials or games to help strengthen weak basic skills.

 

 

I appreciate this view of what constitutes as technology.  It was clear that his use of newer digital technology was a bit restricted and he used “older” technology to facilitate his teaching.

Have you or are you using technology in your Math/science classes? If so what kinds?

-Computer/tablet, projector

-Individual white boards, large white spaces all over the room, bulletin boards (word walls)

Technology usage was essentially anything that made teaching and learning easier for him and the students.
Have there been any advantages to integrating technology into your classroom? For example- How does the technology that you are currently using enhance your classes?

-currently using tablet and projector to scribe notes for students to copy

-helps middle school students learn and become comfortable with taking notes

-he can guide them as to what is important to document

 

For me it kind of helps the middle school grade kids experience note taking better because you scribe out everything…. you can pause in between questions…. we can do examples as a class……gauge of where the kids are at…you know if you are going too fast or too slow.”

 

 

 

 

 

What I understood from this Q & A was that the teacher felt like he was contributing to a major skill development that is needed as the students transition from elementary to high school.

 

Developing a skill such as note taking, can help strengthen a transferable competency which can be applied to the rest of the students educational and professional career.

 

This technology was used only by the teacher to improve his method of note-taking with the class.  It gave him opportunities to be more efficient, engaged with his students, and flexible with what he was scribing based on student needs.

Many teachers use online applications such as Kahoot.  Do you see any positives/negatives to using these types of interactive applications?

-negative- policing of names in profile, may need to have talk about appropriate names

-positive-once students buy in, it is more helpful than not

-positive- good for 5-10 minutes of use to summarize, review, break up time, easy day, engagement, and keeps them off other apps

It is common for teachers to have to discuss norms or policies when introducing technology into the class.  Overall it seems that the teacher feels that Kahoot is a good integration into a lesson at an appropriate time for an appropriate reason.
Can the use of technology engage all students in the classroom?

-depends on time of day and subject matter

-first 20 minutes are usually good

-scribing works best with academically inclined kids

-vertical spaces are amazing, standing makes you work, students like it, use them more with the daily kids. “…. I can witness work up on the board and then I can help them out.”

-on use of individual whiteboards “Its immediate feedback, …. a question on the screen, they write the answer……. show the boards to me and its instant feedback.”

-the immediate feedback gave him a chance to “fix any mistake that’s visible right there and then because I can see the thought process immediately.

– “tweak on the spot”.

These are two important factors to consider when trying to integrate technology into a lesson.  Regardless of how intriguing the technology is, if it is not integrated suitably, including duration of use, it will not engage or quickly lose the students.

 

Having students up out of their desks and using erasable markers gives them proximity from a different viewpoint.  I feel that using erasable markers gives students the security to take a chance with what they write, because it is not permanent.

 

Immediate feedback is the most effective use of interaction between a teacher and his class because it lets the teacher gauge where students are strong or weak.  The ultimate power then lies in the ability to instantaneously steer the lesson accordingly.

What are the obstacles that arise for you when you want/try to incorporate other technology into your math class?

 -budget, dated technology.

-would love to have mobility to engage with students and write the notes at same time,

-current configuration forces him to sit in an awkward spot in the room, limited view

It would be more convenient if I could teach from any spot with the tablet.”

-MyEd portfolio software, inconvenient to use, policing of what students might upload, pressured to use it

 

Sometimes what teachers think might be effective for the classroom, might not always be the case. In this scenario mobility would give the teacher the chance to engage with the students and keep them on track.

Auto e-ography

While teaching Precalculus 12, I had decided to use Desmos (an online graphing calculator) to show graphs of functions.  I was eager because Desmos would be easier/ better than the older graphing calculators (Ti-series), it would let me graph multiple functions to compare and show changes, and I could show the students how to use it for themselves.  This experience is memorable because teaching “driven and smart” seniors can be quite nerve wracking as it is and I had difficulty getting functions to graph because of lack of experience with the software and syntax!  With technology changing so quickly, and no one having the time to become an expert with any specific technology, do the students of today view technological mishaps as  incompetence or an annoyance? Or do they realize this is the norm and see the mishaps as an opportunity to learn how they might have to navigate the software by working through the mishaps as a collective body?

Why the E-folio?

I decided to construct an e-folio as my submission for the second assignment in ETEC 533.  One of the reasons for my decision is primarily because I have not completed an assignment that documents my journey and learning using a blog.  The other reason was precisely that the assignment is structured as a blog, a resource that I have access to that enhances reflection and understanding of my experience in the course.

I wanted to focus on using technology effectively to teach Math and Science.  Could this be done? If so, I would like to construct this knowledge for myself so I can support and guide my future teaching practice.  I could consider which specific technologies, methods of instruction and tasks with the technologies.  This is the intention with which I am completing this assignment.