Evaluation Of the Investigation
Every scientific investigation must be evaluated in terms of accuracy to determine whether of not a statement can be made to clearly answer the guiding purpose or problem. For the purpose of this MET eportfolio, I have developed a rubric to aid in determining whether I have accomplished the goals I have set for the completion of the e-Portfolio.
|
Category |
Not Meeting Expectations |
Meeting Expectations |
Exceeding Expectations |
|
Layout |
-not suitable for e-Portfolio -difficult navigation for user |
-organized and logical layout -revolve around theme and metaphor |
-e-Portfolio is clearly organized in terms of theme and linear structure |
|
Design |
-design varies from page to page |
-consistent design, fonts, colors -good use and variety of design elements |
-outstanding use of design elements -a professional look and feel in terms of colors, fonts and graphics |
|
Spelling & Grammar |
-language is at an academic level for a university post-graduate program |
-few errors -language is deemed acceptable at an university post-graduate level |
-no errors -outstanding language that is deemed in high academic standards |
|
Reflection |
-minimal evidence of connections between learning, courses and theory |
-evidence of reflection is evident but might be too general or too |
-considerable evidence shown -critical connections are made between learning, courses and theory |
|
Artefacts |
–artefacts seem to be chosen haphazardly -artefacts do not tie to learning -limited selection in variety |
-artefacts related to the purpose -a variety of artefacts are chosen |
-artefacts are interrelated to purpose -wide variety of artefacts are chosen |
|
References |
-omission of references
|
-material is cited in acceptable form -few errors |
-material is cited properly and opinions are supported by research |