I think my own definition of technology is perhaps closest to Muffoletto (1994), who observes that technology is not just about the latest gadgets, but more a way of acting. He suggests that technology is applying the latest tools to address needs and problems. I do think; however, that technology is more pervasive than this. It has infiltrated virtually every aspect of our lives in both work AND play. Perhaps most especially play!
My iPhone is permanently attached to my hand or in my pocket. I use Siri for the most ridiculous things…just because I can, and I am currently battling a terrible addiction to Temple Run 2. Our “First-World” use of technology has progressed past addressing needs and problems and into a more dangerous realm. It has created a class of technology-junkies, who are not satisfied with what they have; with their eyes on the horizon, they are desperate for their next score. Who will be the next person to scoop a new piece of technology and show it off to envious friends? This dependence on technology has hampered social gatherings, dinners out, and yes, Education.
Just because something is new and guaranteed to be fabulous does not mean it should automatically be implemented in to our instruction! Muffoletto’s (1994) use of a way of acting. is important because he stresses not just the tools, but the process of applying the tools to situations. In a classroom, technology is a wonderful tool and attractant for the students, but taking notes on paper still has its role! Certainly technology is helpful, time-saving (mostly!) and “cool” but there are still things we do without modern technology that need not be cast aside.

Muffoletto, R. (1994). Technology and restructuring education: Constructing a context. Educational Technology, 34(2), 24-28.