Speaking from the bottom of my heart, I feel that Nellie Campobello’s Cartucho should have been labelled with an 18+ rating due to its extremely graphic and gruesome depiction of events that occurred in Parral during wartime, as seen through the eyes of a firsthand witness. I appreciated the fragmented style of writing, as the sense of unease only intensified with each delve into the author’s trove of memories, providing a brief pause before plunging into the next story, each one titled with the name of a character who would soon meet a gruesome and senseless death. At first, I was revolted by the disturbingly vivid and detailed descriptions of brutality, but as the story progressed, I found myself growing numb to the gore and death, much like the author’s progression towards the acceptance and knowledge development in matters of death as part of everyday life, as reflected in her comment on the death of her dear friend Babis, who worked at the candy store: “It’s the way these days,” and “I said, convinced of my knowledge in matters of death”.
Furthermore, it was intriguing to note that, although the stories were told from the perspective of a child, the author rarely depicted any feelings of fear. One would expect a young child to be overwhelmed with emotion, but instead, the author conveyed only a sense of numbness towards death and resentment towards injustice. This is exemplified in her reactions when her friends Zafiro and Zequiel died, Campobello described herself as simply upset, only silently repeating “Pobrecitos, pobrecitos, poor things” without shedding a single tear. Also, when she witnessed a bully towards her mother by a troop of soldiers, she thought in her mind “I couldn’t study, I spent it thinking about being a man, having a pistol and firing a hundred shots into him.” This left me to question whether these emotions (especially fear) were intentionally left out or if they simply did not exist in the first place.
In conclusion, this read certainly opened my eyes to viewing the Mexican Revolution from an unconventional perspective of the vulnerable population, often viewed as the supporting roles in a novel, unlike most narratives depicted from the main character’s point of view. Viewing the war from a child’s perspective does leave me unsettled as it highlights the innocence and vulnerability of children who were affected by the violence and brutality of the war. It also highlights the emotional and psychological impact that witnessing such events can have on a child and their future. However, I do feel that it provides a unique and powerful perspective on the events of the war, as it conveys the unseen side of the war through the eyes of a vulnerable population and gives voice to the emotions and experiences that are often left unspoken. It serves as a reminder of the human cost of war and the impact it can have on individuals and communities.
Question: Do you feel that viewing from a child’s perspective provides a unique and powerful perspective on the events of the war?
“the author conveyed only a sense of numbness towards death and resentment towards injustice”
Hmm. Though I understand that the narrator doesn’t always react as we expect her to, I’m not sure that “numbness” is always right… e.g. in the chapter about “General Sobrano’s Guts,” she expresses excitement and delight… which may not be the shock or horror we expect, but is hardly “numb.” What other affects and emotions does she evidence?
(NB I see that in your contract you said you’d be reading Azuela… It’s fine to change at this stage, but you will need to submit a revised contract in the next couple of weeks.)
Hi there! In response to your question, I think we must all agree that being told these events from a child was almost unexpected for this sort of material. Nonetheless, more personally I can attest to being impacted by the recollections much more than if it were ‘just another violent war novel’. I think it was the exaggerated feelings of innocence, as children more easily come off this way, for all the “peacekeepers” or “freedom fighters” of any revolution.
However, besides this, it could be argued that because children are less involved in political drama – much context was lost – so much as I found it very difficult to understand what each character was involved with or fighting for vs. another. Altogether I enjoyed the read, likely more than if it was an older perspective, but see how some detail was lost.
Hello Shade! I found your comment about how there were no feelings of fear to be really interesting. I honestly did not think about the other emotions, or any emotions for that matter, that the child should have been feeling during the time of war. It is true that none of the stories really gave a sense of fear, disgust, or even confusion. At first I thought that maybe this could have been the point of the novel? Since it is written from the perspective of a child, and the book has no clear sense of bias towards any political or ethical beliefs, maybe the emotions of the child would have interfered with this aspect? I also do agree that this book gives us a unique perspective to war and the destruction that it creates. I feel like normally we just read about revolutions in history class but this book felt like a much more personal look into war itself.