Monthly Archives: June 2021

LinkedIn process

This assignment was fertile because it made me aware of how beneficial a LinkedIn account is. In exploring the best practices of LinkedIn, I was able to understand some of their terms of use, restrictions and how to attain the best results for job search. Having a LinkedIn profile is valuable as social media has become a prominent job searching and recruiting method. Although LinkedIn is not new to me, I would typically rely on other avenues such as Indeed to explore job offers. This assignment has enabled me to use the site more effectively, and since many job recruiters utilize LinkedIn, it would be wise to create a professional account.

Moreover, it was worthwhile to read the best practices posted by my peers. This aided with the learning process as well. Finally, I learned LinkedIn is an excellent channel to broadcast oneself positively, make lifelong connections, and help others form networks as well. I was grateful for this task because it allowed me to learn the importance of using social media to build my professional profile. Currently, I am looking forward to the endeavours of making a professional social media network.

Brainstorming and preparation process 

The process of brainstorming and preparing my report and outline was a learning curve. Upon reflection, I can see how I could use my experience learned in this assignment to apply to other workplace issues; or advise a peer on the appropriate steps. Furthermore, it was challenging to develop an issue that wouldn’t be viewed as a negative outlook on the practice. As I am still working through learning how to complete a formal report, I am grateful that there are stages that will allow me to receive feedback from peers and my instructor.

Peer review 

Peer reviews are valuable to me as I can see my shortcomings while writing. I am thankful to Shahd Khudher for providing constructive feedback about my report proposal. Shahd gave me a lot of positive feedback, and these annotations have made me feel that my writing has improved a little since the start of this course, which is rewarding. My colleague advised that I should put the unabbreviated form of the words like CDHO & RCDSO so that an audience who does not know what these terms mean will understand what they stand for. I took for granted that the proposal was being sent to the person who would already be familiar with these terms, and in my updated proposal, I have made this correction.

Moreover, since there would be legal liabilities involved in inadequate infection prevention and control practices, it would be essential to use legal documents to show the reader the implications of poor practices. However, I’m not sure how this would come across to the reader. I wonder if it would come across as offensive or judgemental, which is not the intended purpose of the proposal. The proposal’s goal is to work collaboratively in a healthy manner to alter certain practices that would ultimately be better for the public and dental team. Concerning my colleague Shahd, her work did not surprise me because she is a solid writer. Shahd’s writing is thorough and concise, which I can emulate when writing.

Hyperlink to revised Formal Report Proposal:

https://blogs.ubc.ca/engl301-98a-2021sa/2021/06/28/revised-report-proposal/

Hyperlink to Formal Report Outline:

https://blogs.ubc.ca/engl301-98a-2021sa/2021/06/25/formal-report-outline/

This assignment revealed the importance of breaking down complex terms to make it easier for persons with no background knowledge to understand the meaning. Working in healthcare, it is essential to explain words in a way that is easy for the client to understand to aid in client compliance with treatment regimens and attain optimal oral health results. Oftentimes it can be taken for granted that the client knows what the healthcare professional is referring to because of routine conversations with coworkers. Healthcare professionals like dental hygienists must avoid this type of speech to discourage confusion. This assignment has allowed me to critically analyze word selection, sentence structure and how this may be perceived by others.

The choice I made while writing was:

For a challenge, a more complex term was chosen that is not often used within dental practice . Based on the peer review received, I put a good effort forward. I am uncertain if the term was easier to understand because of our similar career backgrounds. This term should be explained to someone with no dental background to determine if the explanation is clear.

Peer review process:

A challenge arose when explaining what a ranula was not. There had to be a similar comparison to the original term,  but not overcomplicate it for the reader. Miranda Hoang provided sound recommendations, and I am grateful for the positive and critical feedback received. Although Miranda highlighted that the introduction of another complex term might be confusing to the reader.  It is noteworthy to mention that it is difficult to compare pathological lesions to something similar without introducing a new lesion.  The closest resemblance to a ranula would be a mucocele. This term was introduced on the basis that my audience has grasped the term ranula. Both are cysts; just the location and size differ and should not be confused. Also, I did not want to overlook Miranda’s advice when stated, “you may want to consider adding what one might do if they have a ranula.” Adding this information would stray away from explaining the meaning of the term to treatment recommendations.

Editing process:

Initially, posting the image directly into the assignment posed a challenge. Putting the hyperlink to the image was the best solution because I could not figure out how to insert the image. Through trial and error, I learned how to successfully insert the visual into the assignment; this was rewarding and self-satisfying because I overcame a small learning curve.

In future, writing more clearly to avoid confusion should be worked on. This peer review exercise was helpful because it allows the writer to see the work through the  lens of the reader. Also, it allows for constructive feedback that will ultimately aid in improving writing techniques. Comparing my writing technique to Miranda’s, I could be more concise in future.

Hyperlink to revised peer definition:

https://blogs.ubc.ca/engl301-98a-2021sa/2021/06/09/revised-three-definitions/

Hyperlink to peer review:

https://blogs.ubc.ca/engl301-98a-2021sa/2021/06/04/peer-review-of-assignment-13/