.jpg/640px-US_Navy_081003-N-2456S-020_Aviation_Electronics_Technician_Airman_Eric_Syck_burns_trash_in_the_incinerator_aboard_the_aircraft_carrier_USS_Theodore_Roosevelt_(CVN_71).jpg)
- A worker loading garbage into an incinerator
A recent article from the Vancouver Sun reveals that the Metro Vancouver board is planning introduce garbage incinerators to the region, claiming that they will be good for the environment and the economy. This sounds like a ludicrous proposal at first glance and on more careful analysis, it actually is one.
Metro Vancouver‘s reasoning is that since they will be burning garbage, there will be considerably less garbage going landfills each year. This and the fact that garbage incinerators can be used to generate electricity is allowing Metro Vancouver to frame this as a project of sustainability.
The unfortunate reality is that this project meets none of the three pillars of sustainability: economical, social, and environmental.

- The three pillars of Sustainability (Wikimedia)
The main problem is that burning garbage doesn’t really get rid of it, as every tonne of garbage burnt just means that it has been converted into one tonne of greenhouse gases released into the atmosphere.
A more disturbing problem is that besides greenhouse gases, highly toxic gases are also created from the burning of garbage, presenting a serious health threat to communities near the incinerator.
The third problem is that this project isn’t even economically sustainable as a KPMG auditor hired by the Vancouver Board of Trade found that Metro Vancouver’s cost projections were too low and that their revenue projections were too high.
This shows that even though sustainability is a very popular buzzword nowadays, achieving it is much harder than what one would think.
For more reasons against the proposed project: zerowastebc.org



