Aronin, S. & O’Neal, M. (2011). Twenty ways to assess students using technology. Science Scope, 34(9), p. 25-31. Retrieved from http://www.nsta.org/middleschool/
Brand, S.T., Favazza, A.E., & Dalton, E.M. (2012). Universal design for learning: A blueprint for success for all learners. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 48, p. 134-139. doi: 10.1080/00228958.2012.707506
British Columbia Ministry of Education. (2005). Social studies 11: Integrated resource package 2005. Retrieved from http://www.bced.gov.bc.ca/irp/subject.php?lang=en&subject=Social_Studies
Beck, D. & Eno, J. (2012). Signature pedagogy: A literature review of social studies and technology research. Computers in Schools, 29(1-2), p. 70-94. doi: 10.1080/07380569.2012.658347
Bouck, E.C., Courtad, C.A., Heutsche, A., Okolo, C.M., & Englert, C.S. (2009). The virtual history museum: A universally designed approach to social studies instruction. Teaching Exceptional Children, 42(2), p. 14-20. Retrieved from http://journals.cec.sped.org/tec/
Capo, B.H. & Orellana, A. (2011). Web 2.0 technologies for classroom instruction: High school teachers’ perceptions and adoption factors. The Quarterly Review of Distance education, 12(4), pp. 235-253.
CAST. (2012). About UDL: What is universal design for learning? Retrieved from http://www.cast.org/udl/
Edyburn, D.L. (2010). Would you recognize universal design for learning if you saw it? Ten propositions for new directions for the second decade of UDL. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33(1), p. 33-41. Retrieved from http://www.cldinternational.org/Publications/LDQ.asp
Frye, E. M., Trathen, W., & Koppenhaver, D.A. (2010). Internet workshop and blog publishing: Meeting student (and teacher) learning needs to achieve best practice in the twenty-first century social studies classroom. The Social Studies, 101(2), p. 46-53. doi:10.1080/00377990903284070
Goldfarb, B. (2002). Students as producers. In Visual Pedagogy: Media Cultures in and Beyond the Classroom, (pp. 57-83). Durham: Duke University Press.
Heafner, T. & Friedman, A. (2008). Wikis and constructivism in secondary social studies: Fostering a deeper understanding. Computers in the Schools, 25(3-4), p. 288 – 302. doi: 10.1080/07380560802371003
Holcomb, L.B. and Beal, C.M. (2010). Capitalizing on web 2.0 in the social studies context. Tech Trends, 54(4), p. 28-33. doi: 10.1007/s11528-010-0417-0
Johnson, L., Adams, S., & Cummins, M. (2012). NMC Horizon Report: 2012 K-12 Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
Kliegman, K. (2010). Step aside Karl Rove! These kids are tech savvy. Learning and Leading with Technology, 37(7), p. 34-35. Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/learn/publications/learning-leading
Leadbeater, C. (2013). Canadian education association viewpoint: Why intellectual engagement matters. Education Canada, 53(1). Retrieved from http://www.cea-ace.ca/education-canada/article/viewpoint-why-intellectual-engagement-matters
Maloy, R.W., Poirier, M., Smith, H.K., & Edwards, S.A. (2010). The making of a histories standards wiki: Covering, uncovering, and discovering curriculum frameworks using interactive technology. The History Teacher, 44(1), p. 67-81. Retrieved from http://www.societyforhistoryeducation.org/
Manfra, M.M. & Lee, J.K. (2012). “You have to know the past to (blog) about the present:” Using an educational blog to engage students in U.S. history. Computers in the Schools, 29(1-2), p. 118-134. doi: 10.1080/07380569.2012.656543
Meo, G. (2008). Curriculum planning for all learning: Applying universal design for learning (UDL) to a high school reading comprehension program. Preventing School Failure, 52(2), p. 21-30. Retrieved from http://www.udlcenter.org/resource_library/articles/hs_reading
National Center on Universal Design for Learning. (2012a). UDL guidelines – Version 2.0: Examples and resources. Checkpoint 5.1: Use multiple media for communication. Retrieved from http://www.udlcenter.org/implementation/examples/examples5_1
National Center on Universal Design for Learning. (2012b). UDL guidelines – Version 2.0: Examples and resources. Checkpoint 2.1: Clarify vocabulary and symbols. Retrieved from http://www.udlcenter.org/implementation/examples/examples2_1
O’Rourke, M. (2001). Engaging students through ICT: A multiliteracies approach. Teaching Learning Network Journal: Change growth and innovation, 8(3), pp. 12-13.
Premier’s Technology Council (2010). A Vision for 21st Century Education. Retrieved from http://www.gov.bc.ca/premier/attachments/PTC_vision%20for_education.pdf
Tapscott, D. (2008). Net geners relate to news in new ways. Nieman Reports. Retrieved from http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/reportsitem.aspx?id=100674
The New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), p. 60-92. Retrieved from http://wwwstatic.kern.org/filer/blogWrite44ManilaWebsite/paul/articles/A_Pedagogy_of_Multiliteracies_Designing_Social_Futures.htm
Wilson, E., Wright, V., Inman, C.T., & Matherson, L.H. (2011). Retooling the social studies classroom for the current generation. The Social Studies, 102(2), p. 65-72. doi: 10.1080/00377996.2010.484445
Yan, J. (2008). Social technology as a new medium in the classroom. The New England Journal of Higher Education, 22(4), p. 27, 29-30. Retrieved from http://www.nebhe.org/thejournal/
Proceed to multimedia references.