{"id":10,"date":"2020-01-18T00:27:09","date_gmt":"2020-01-18T07:27:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/sophiedafesh\/?p=10"},"modified":"2020-01-18T00:27:09","modified_gmt":"2020-01-18T07:27:09","slug":"assignment-13-orality-and-the-internet","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/sophiedafesh\/2020\/01\/18\/assignment-13-orality-and-the-internet\/","title":{"rendered":"Assignment 1:3 Orality and the Internet"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Question: At the beginning of this lesson I pointed to the idea that technological advances in communication tools have been part of the impetus to rethink the divisive and hierarchical categorizing of literature and orality, and suggested that this is happening for a number of reasons.\u00a0 I\u2019d like you to consider two aspects of digital literature: 1) social media tools that enable widespread publication, without publishers, and 2) Hypertext, which is the name for the text that lies beyond the text you are reading, until <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">you<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> click. How do you think these capabilities might be impacting literature and story?<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">When I consider how technological advances in communication tools have changed the hegemonic structuring of orality within literary traditions. I think primarily of the internet, but also of mass communication devices such as television, radio, and film, which since the advent of sound and talking in film, have challenged the predominance of literary communication which had previously held dominance in western culture and academia. In a film studies course that I am taking concurrently to this one, we looked at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=8SzltpkGz0M\">this<\/a> clip of the <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Jazz Singer<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, the first film which featured individuals speaking. It may seem insignificant to us now, but at the time it was seen as revolutionary. In retrospect, developments such as these have paved the way for the return to oral literary forms as they have enabled oral forms of storytelling to spread. The second key development is the internet which has enabled those with access to it to publish their own content without having to rely on publishing bodies, which tend to proliferate the voices of those who are in positions of socio-political power. There are plenty of online sites in which individuals can self publish their works without the need to publish work that fits outside of the current boundaries established by publishers. Not only that but there are also oral possibilities for communication which have been introduced by the internet. Sites such as Youtube and Vimeo have enabled people to orally share ideas while using visual evidence, through the use of what is called a &#8220;Video Essay&#8221;. This, as well as Vlogging, and other new media methods of communication, have enabled ideas and stories which relied on an oral component to be spread among anyone with access to the internet, and produced by anyone with basic editing software. In one of our assigned readings, Courtney MacNeil&#8217;s piece &#8220;<a href=\"https:\/\/lucian.uchicago.edu\/blogs\/mediatheory\/keywords\/orality\/\">Orality<\/a>&#8221; she discusses how &#8220;cyberspace&#8221; has &#8220;created a world where the distinction between&#8221; oral media and literary media has &#8220;blurred&#8221;. The blurring of the two types of media challenges the way they had previously been viewed by academics as being distinct and separate, with literal media being placed in priority over oral. To me, this structuring replicates patterns of Western Colonial dominance, and is further problematized when the concept of access is considered. Structures of ideological power, such as academia have been found to &#8220;under-represent&#8221; &#8220;radicalized and Indigenous professors&#8221; (Frances Henry, et al,). This has resulted in white colonial voices, establishing patterns of narrative and value. While the internet is certainly not going to subvert colonial patterns of idealogical control all on its own, it has democratized the spread of stories and ideas along cultural and beyond national lines.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To address the ways in which Hypertext has contributed to the way in which ideas and stories are exchanged; I find that the Hypertext has contributed to our understanding of the ways in which ideas are interconnected. Our ways of storytelling inevitably connect to preceding ideas and stories. Starting as children, we learn how to tell stories by having them told to us. Hypertexts allows the writer to connect their ideas to the ideas of others. They also enable oral storytelling modes to be linked to written ones. This further decentralizes the written text and enables it to connect to the hypertext.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Works Cited<\/p>\n<p>Crosland, Alan, director.\u00a0<i>The Jazz Singer<\/i>.\u00a0<i>The Spoken Words That Caused A Sensation In &#8220;The Jazz Singer&#8221; (1927)<\/i>, YouTube, 19 Apr. 2020, https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=8SzltpkGz0M.<\/p>\n<p>Frances Henry, Enakshi Dua, Audrey Kobayashi, Carl James, Peter Li, Howard Ramos &amp; Malinda S. Smith (2016): Race, racialization and Indigeneity in Canadian universities, Race Ethnicity and Education, DOI: 10.1080\/13613324.2016.1260226<\/p>\n<p><strong>MacNeil\u00a0Courtney<\/strong>.\u00a0<a class=\"external\" href=\"http:\/\/lucian.uchicago.edu\/blogs\/mediatheory\/keywords\/orality\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">\u201cOrality<em>.\u201d The Chicago School of Media Theory<\/em>.\u00a0\u00a0<span class=\"screenreader-only\">\u00a0(Links to an external site.)<\/span><\/a>Uchicagoedublogs. 2007. Web. 19 Feb. 2013<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Question: At the beginning of this lesson I pointed to the idea that technological advances in communication tools have been part of the impetus to rethink the divisive and hierarchical categorizing of literature and orality, and suggested that this is happening for a number of reasons.\u00a0 I\u2019d like you to consider two aspects of digital [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":69985,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/sophiedafesh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/sophiedafesh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/sophiedafesh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/sophiedafesh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/69985"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/sophiedafesh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/sophiedafesh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/sophiedafesh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10\/revisions\/11"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/sophiedafesh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/sophiedafesh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/sophiedafesh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}