Visualization through “Mind’s Eye”

An excerpt from Srinivasan et. al. article on Reality versus Simulation is a perfect example of the importance of information visualization for mathematics. One of the participants in the study discussed in Srinivasan et. al’s article states, “…when you’re getting the signals on the computer all you’re doing is typing the equation and getting a graphic, but when you’re getting it on the lab equipment, you’re actually setting frequencies and … it seems more real” (Srinivasan et. al., 2006, p. 139). Every teacher tries to do his/ her best to be able to help students understand the learning outcomes of a lesson and it becomes even more rewarding for a teacher when a child is able to visualize the learning and see it as something “real”. Information visualization helps teachers across the globe achieve that reward of helping students see textbook problems as “real” problems.

According to Edens and Potter, “Visual-spatial representations may function as mental imagery, or in the “mind’s eye””(Edens & Potter, 2008, p. 184). Being able to visualize something really is being able to see it with the mind’s eye. I always find myself looking in the space, staring at nothing when trying to visualize something, as I am trying to see it with my mind’s eye. As it is widely seen that students are mostly interested in just finding the right answer and moving on to the next question. As Edens and Potter call these students the ‘number grabbers’ as they like to ‘compute first and think later’. I think in a situation as such, it is even more important for students to be able to visualize the problem before solving it.

I have chosen to apply T-GEM instruction framework and combine it with NetLOGO digital simulation introduced in this lesson. I think in my grade 8 honors class while teaching the graphing units where I introduce rate-of-change, I could use NetLOGO as the online simulator to help students visualize how a graph might get affected if the speed of one car changes compared to the other car at the constant speed. I will be using the “Traffic Basic” simulation on NetLOGO for this lesson activity starting with one red and one blue car.

Generate:

Step 1: Students are asked to identify the variables that affect the speed of the red car.

Step 2: Students are asked to get familiarized with the simulation and generate relationships between the speed of the red car and acceleration and deceleration

Evaluation:

Step 3: Students are asked to evaluate why are there two controls given to control the speed of the red car- acceleration and deceleration.

Step 4: Students are asked to evaluate the relationship between acceleration and deceleration and how they affect the speed in different ways

Modify:

Step 5: Students are asked to try using more than 5 cars at a time to experiment how the graph may get affected when the speed is played around with.

Step 6: Students use the new knowledge gained through the second step of T-GEM to modify the knowledge and find a relationship between acceleration and deceleration with more than 5 cars at play.

References:

Edens, K., & Potter, E. (2008). How students “unpack” the structure of a word problem: Graphic representations and problem-solving. School Science and Mathematics, 108(5), 184-196

Srinivasan, S., Perez, L. C., Palmer,R., Brooks,D., Wilson,K., & Fowler. D. (2006). Reality versus simulation. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15 (2), 137-141

https://www.netlogoweb.org/launch#https://www.netlogoweb.org/assets/modelslib/Sample%20Models/Social%20Science/Traffic%20Basic.nlogo

4 comments

  1. Hi Gursimran,

    Your comment about students visualising the problem before attempting to solve it really hit home with me. I find students in my class are almost starting to solve the question before even fully reading it! Do you think there is any merit in the idea of built in thinking time, or something similar? I like how your lesson asks students to identify parts of the problem first, this is certainly something I try with my grade 6 students when encountering a tricky mathematical problem. I can’t guarantee that they use this strategy when i’m not around! I also like how your lesson has a natural build up. Thanks for sharing!

    Kathryn

    1. Hi Kathryn,

      I personally have not tried thinking time or similar strategies with my students before but I think it is something worth a try, especially with students who tend to rush through problems and not read problems fully before solving them.

      Another thing that you might want to try is to give less “repeating” practice problems and more problems that require students to read fully first.

      GK

  2. Hi Gursimran,

    I like the fact that you discussed that it “becomes even more rewarding for a teacher when a child is able to visualize the learning and see it as something “real”.” I remember when I was teaching F2F seeing the students faces when the concept we were covering finally clicked (the ha-ha moment).

    I wonder how the online teacher can visualize the learning of their students?

    Christopher

    1. Great point, Christopher!

      I have taken a few online courses in my university career so far and I find it difficult to express myself as well as I could if it was an in-person course. I guess that goes for the teacher as well.

      Perhaps, using vlogs instead of blogs sometimes maybe a good idea.

      GK

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *