Misconceptions in mathematics are common, and are usually misunderstanding and/or misinterpretation based on incorrect meanings. Knowing the nature of a misconception and its source would help to fathom ways of planning appropriate instruction that is beneficial to students. A likely misconception to see in my math class is This misconception could be associated with students transitioning from operations with whole numbers to operations with fractions because, to them, the rules have changed. Because of previous “knowledge”, the students performed operations distinctly, considering the numerators and the denominators in separate operation. In order to teach additions and subtraction involving fractions, it is important to impress upon the students that the numerator indicates the number of parts and the denominator indicates the types of part (the whole). The computational rule usually don’t help students think about the operations and what they mean. When the students are only armed with rules, even when the rules are mastered, it is quickly lost in the short term as the myriad of rules soon become meaningless when mixed together (On complex operations).
I am using the 3-step T-GEM cycle to create activities that cover operations involving fractions.
To generate relationship: the students will begin with simple contextual tasks. The students will challenge themselves with an interactive activity on Phet Interactive Simulations website. The goal is to enable them to find matching fractions using numbers and pictures, to make the same fractions using different numbers, to match fractions in different picture patterns, to compare fractions using numbers and patterns. Here is a link to the activity.
To evaluate the relationship: at this point the students are expected to have a conceptual understanding of fractions that is the numerator indicates the number of parts and the denominator indicates the types of part (the whole). The students will engage in operations involving fractions. Because the students usually handle addition better than subtraction, they will start with addition, adding fraction with same denominator. The vast majority of my students can tell that a half plus a half is one or one whole. I will write down the question and apply their general strategy (the misconception stated earlier), then interesting questions will raised.
This example will shake the misconception. The students will be encouraged to connect the meaning of fraction computation with whole number computation such as ¼ is one part out of four equal parts of a whole. In order to practise addition of fractions with same and different denominators, the students will use the interactive activity “Fraction wall” . The activity illustrates the addition of fractions using array technique. The students will explore similar array techniques to perform subtraction. An illustration of using array technique is
The aim of this model is to help the students learn to think about fraction and the operation, to contribute to mental methods, and provide a useful background when they eventually learn the standard algorithms of LCM.
To modify the relationship: the students will reflect on the work by using an interactive activity that allow them to visualise an array of fractions, compare, add, subtract, and multiply two fractions with animations providing a conceptual understanding over the use of LCM to perform fractions operations. Here is a link to the activity.
Reference:
Khan, S. (2011). New pedagogies on teaching science with computer simulations. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(3), 215-232.
Hi Vivien,
I like the fact that you shared a helpful activity (http://flash.topmarks.co.uk/5105). The user can change the representation. I had to play the first part a few times to understand what they were trying to explain. I wonder if sound or even text would have been helpful or would these things be distracting to the learner?
Christopher
Hi Christopher,
Thank you for your feedback. I find the conceptual understanding of the splitting and merging process involved in this activity quite challenging for the students to grasp it on the first attempt. I aim to have the students fathom out this conceptual understanding through investigations and collaboration. I am thinking of having a minimal influence on students’ learning and understanding over this activity. The idea is to introduce the splitting and merging process while performing operations with simple fractions such as 1/2 and 1/3. Then when possible, rather than answering students’ questions, I will direct them to investigation or examples that would provide them with answers. Presented this way, this activity can be quite intense and cognitive demanding. In such a way that a support for sense-making such as sound or text at critical moment in the activity would have been useful in directing students’ attention to specific mathematical phenomena. It is unfortunate that the application does not provide the option to add sound or text.
Vivien
Hi Vivien,
I found your post to be very insightful. I see that misconception as well. Students think that they just need to subtract the top and the bottom and that is all; funny how these misconceptions come about and how common they really are. I like your use of the TGEM model for this math concept and the activity that you shared. It’s great that everyone is sharing all of these wonderful resources that are relevant to our teaching practice and that can actually be used in the class.