For my interview, I chose to interview a colleague who has been in education for 25 years. He is a teacher at my school in Manchester and he was Head of Department before he was appointed to the Senior Leadership Team of the secondary school attached to the Junior School that I work in. He has been in this role for 4 years and he is responsible for the academic management of the school, ensuring that the teaching and learning component of the school is delivered to the highest possible standard. For the past two years, a focus of his has been to drive the school’s ‘Bring Your Own Device’ scheme, which was implemented this past September. This scheme was the main focus of the interview. The interview took place in my colleague’s office, from 7:30-8:00am on Thursday 18th January 2018. Below is an analysis of the interview, focusing in on three key sections.
Why BYOD?
I asked my colleague why he chose to drive and implement the ‘Bring Your Own Device’ scheme at our school and he discussed a wide variety of reasons why, despite the many challenges he faced, this is so important. First, he noted that we are helping the students to develop skills that are necessary in the modern world and that are needed to be successful in life after they leave school. Second, he reviewed the collaboration opportunities for students and believes them to much greater than when they are using traditional pen and paper methods. Further, these collaboration opportunities are beneficial for both students and teachers. He also believes that by having their own devices at school, students’ access to large resources full of information creates more individualized learning paths by allowing them to access a greater range of information; the teacher is no longer the sole possessor of knowledge. He also mentioned that everyone having a device enables communication between students, parents and teachers to be smoother and more immediate.
Challenges
The scheme itself created several challenges including cost, which devices were acceptable and having appropriate IT support. However, the number one challenge that my colleague noted was persuading teachers that there is a better way to do things than the method they are currently using. The school that we work at is quite unique. It is an academically selective independent school. The girls are required to take an exam to get in, meaning all the girls are what might be labelled at another school as more able. Therefore, the school achieves excellent exam results and prides itself not only on academic success, but also developing well rounded students. He discussed how teachers can demonstrate reluctance to try new methods by citing the ‘if it’s not broke don’t fix it’ mentality. The students thrive academically, the girls are happy and there is a very good atmosphere around the school…so why change anything? He further explained that teachers can think the learning curve is too steep and ever changing, it creates extra work and takes too much time.
Further, due to our school being quite niche and small, my colleague said that there is lack of data from similar schools to demonstrate success, which he said would help to get teachers on board.
To mitigate these challenges we discussed how all devices must be compatible with a stylus, as all teachers are able to use resources that have already been developed as a start. Further, there is ongoing professional development to support teachers in this scheme.
Differentiation
When I asked my colleague where he sees technology in education going in the future, he responded that proper differentiation will be more accessible without creating a great deal of extra work for the teachers. He hopes that teachers will be able to facilitate individualized learning paths for students, where they can investigate their own interests in their own way. He hopes that this will help learning to ‘stop being restricted to boxes’ and students will be able to pursue their passions in a learning style that fits best with them.