Lesson 2.3: Interview

checkbox2Category to select: A. Interview
Due on Tuesday of Week 4.

Share an abstract of your interview using three key words as identifiers.

Read at least three of your peers’ abstracts and look for connections, similarities and differences within particular issue/questions, and across multiple contexts. You can use the guiding questions below as well to prompt reflection.

  • How was your interview unique?
  • What does this say about the context/place or the issue?

1. The abstract should include a brief background of the interviewee (teaching experience and current teaching context), background of the interview setting (place and time of interview) and at least three summary points (with copius use of supporting quotes) that highlight the main aspects of the interview that based on your analysis are important to you or are representative of the interviewees views. This abstract should be between 250 and 350 words at minimum. Ensure to use a set of key words and descriptors in the subject heading that reflects the nature of your interview. Post in advance of the respond by date.
2. Respond to others’ postings by Tuesday of Week 4. Check the calendar.


The Value of Technology in the Classroom

Posted by kamille brodber on January 24, 2018

Are we losing to technology?

Posted by gursimran kaur on

Competitive Play, Privacy and Time+Expertise

Posted by jan lewis on

Depth, Accessibility and Differentiation

Posted by caleb poole on

Fear – Meeting the Student – Examples and Exploration – Thoughtful Selection

Posted by scott skanes on

Real-Time, Speed, Location

Posted by gordon chiu on January 23, 2018

Failure is OK, collaboration, plan for the skills

Posted by shayla mangat on

New teachers… old teachers… same issues

Posted by tracy evans on

Collaboration, Persistence, & Communication

Posted by allison greig on

Infrastructure, Whole-picture, Questioning

Posted by amanda ghegin on

Responsibility, Collaboration, Engagement

Posted by david dykstra on

Purpose, Preparation, Distraction

Posted by kari matusiak on January 22, 2018

Affordances, Efficiency and Intention Within the Use of Technology in the Mathematics Classroom

Posted by BrynHammett on

Collaboration, Virtualisation, Conceptualisation, and Engagement

Posted by vivien kamhoua on

Girls full STEAM ahead!

Posted by Mary Grant on

Science & Technology: Communication, Differentiation & Flexibility

Posted by alicewong on

A New Mindset for Teacher Professional Development

Posted by trisha roffey on January 21, 2018

Engaging, Collaboration & Differentiation

Posted by amanda gill on

Interview: lack of support, lack of training, lack of funding and limited access to technology

Posted by nicole moxey on

Why BYOD? Challenges and Differentiation

Posted by Kathryn Williams on

Theory-to-practice transfer, errors foster learning, networking of teachers

Posted by elske ammenwerth on

Accessibility, Challenges & Collaboration – Oh My!

Posted by sarah fitzpatrick on January 20, 2018

Collaboration, Experience, and Exploration

Posted by jonathan weber on

CHALLENGES, LEARNING, MISCONCEPTIONS

Posted by RyanSilverthorne on January 18, 2018

Empowerment, Challenging, and Collaboration

Posted by Sabrina Nijjar on