According to David Jonassen (2000), “students [do not] learn from computers or teachers-which has been a traditional assumption of most schooling… students learn from thinking in meaningful ways.” This idea supports the new BC curriculum that encourages teachers to provide students with opportunities to creatively and critically think, as well as to collaborate and communicate with their peers. Our math and science (actually ALL!) learning spaces need to provide students with a variety of areas that contain flexible seating, as well as tools that encourage students to think critically. The reason for providing choice is because not all students learn in the same way. Some students would prefer to stand, others sitting on the floor, others need to fidget and still some of our learners prefer desks and chairs. Students should have the freedom to move between these workstations freely (as long as they can handle this responsibility). Since many teachers are moving away from doing whole class lessons, students need areas to work on exploratory activities in small groups. The designer of these spaces should ensure that they contain a variety of technology tools (VR, iPads, laptops, 3D printers, etc.) and seating choices (hokki stools, tables, couches, rugs, standing desks, etc.). All of the materials, tools and furniture in the room should moveable so that it’s easy to create different learning areas, depending on the activities the students are engaging in.
This is would be the ideal classroom that I would teach in. I could change the room around based on my students’ needs, learning styles and curriculum activities. The problem is that many districts do not have a large budget for furniture and/or technology. How do we convince our districts of the importance of flexible seating and variety of technology tools?