Although we are taught from a very young age not to break rules but to follow them, as we grow older we tend to realize rules can be bent and use this to our advantage. Sometimes the decisions we have to make along the way become unethical and our judgment becomes clouded even with rules to guide our way to righteousness. Our own government in alliance with the UK has been considering breaking the rules in regards to the Kyoto Protocol. The Kyoto Protocol requires Canada to reduce greenhouse emissions by an average of 6% compared to the 1990 levels. However, not only have we not been reaching this target point, we have actually been increasing greenhouse emissions by 34% since 2009. On top of everything, the latest issue within the last few days has been revolving around UK helping Canada exploit the vast oil sand pits located in Calgary. This vast tar sands is the second largest carbon reserve following the carbon reserve in Saudi Arabia. The issue with extracting oil from this area is that the energy needed exceeds conventional oil drilling and contributes to far more greenhouse emissions. Other factors involved with this project include deforestation and air and water pollution, both of which contribute to higher greenhouse emissions. By going through with this environmentally unethical decision, Canada will be contributing to climate change and jeopardizing the future of our planet.
The behavior exhibited by Canada is not a favorable one by environmentalists around the world. However, it does provide Canada with power by having such a scarce resource. By having the second largest reserve for carbon, the oil sand pits can open doors for Canada in many other ways that can help improve its economy. I believe Canada has somewhat abused the power it has gained through the scarce resource in the sense that by going through with the project, the benefits will mostly go towards Canada’s own personal interest while neglecting the interest of the world as a whole. Although there are cons to pursuing this project and it seems in all ways environmentally unethical, there are pros to it as well. The obvious being an increase in fuel and energy resources which will help lower prices for gas. Thus, the behavior cannot be said to be completely immoral as there are positive outcomes to this project as well.
I believe in the end, the project will have short term successes followed by long term failures. In the short run, countries will enjoy the luxury of having lower gas prices and the ability to use their vehicles more with less concern about how it affects the individual financially. Whereas in the long term, our environment will suffer and slowly die off around us.
A bottom up approach may be the solution we need to deal with environmental factors such as greenhouse emissions that are affecting the world. We cannot simply just throw out rules and regulations like the Kyoto Protocol and hope countries like our
own will follow them because that will likely not be the case without any bases of power. The bottom up approach involves countries simply volunteering to set goals and objectives for the future to decrease greenhouse emissions on their own without any binding rules or regulations attached. This way, the countries will be leading by example and according to Cialdini’s influence principle on social proof; other countries will make their decisions based on what the voluntary countries have been doing since we all tend to follow the trend. As well, by volunteering to set such goals, each country will be making a commitment and based on the influence principle of consistency, they will want to stay consistent with their actions no matter what. I believe the difference between this voluntary method of reducing greenhouse gases and the Kyoto Protocol is that the power is given to each country to step up and make a difference, placing the power in each country’s own hands. The Kyoto Protocol is more of an authoritarian approach where countries are insisted on following the provided set of protocols.
Thus, we can set rules or protocols all we want to try and improve the world we live in, but to truly make a difference in this world and influence countries to make the right ethical choices, we have to place the power in their hands and have them
voluntarily commit to the cause on their own. In doing so, each country will learn to truly believe in the environmental cause and do everything in their power to keep our planet alive.








