Questionable sustainability of H&M

Nowadays, the fast-fashion brands want to keep up with the fashion trends and many of them claim to be sustainable brands. However, the reality may be different. My first blog aims to uncover the truth behind these claims by examining the environmental and ethical practices of fast-fashion companies and will focus specifically on Swedish fast-fashion giant, H&M.

Recently, H&M has come under fire for its marketing claims about sustainability, with a lawsuit being filed in the United States, alleging that the company made false and misleading claims about the sustainability of its products. According to the complaint, the company advertised that its clothing was made from “sustainable materials,” such as organic cotton and recycled polyester, but these claims were not supported by evidence.

One of the H&M branches.

The complaint also states that H&M’s advertising misled consumers into believing that the company was taking steps to reduce its environmental impact, while in reality, the company’s practices have a significant impact on the environment. The fast-fashion industry is known for its high levels of waste and pollution,and H&M has been criticized for its reliance on cheap, disposable clothing.

H&M has responded to the lawsuit by stating that it is committed to sustainability and that it has taken steps to reduce its environmental impact. However, the company has not provided any concrete evidence to support its claims. Some experts believe that H&M’s sustainable marketing claims are an attempt to distract from the company’s negative impact on the environment.

"H&M Conscious line" represents the sustainably crafted products.

Additionally, regarding the fair wages, H&M has failed to pay living wages, despite promising to do so for nearly one million workers by 2018. The company has also been vague about their “improved wage management system” and avoided the subject of paying a living wage. This is particularly concerning when compared to the high salaries of H&M’s top officials and CEO, who earned over $809 million in 2018 alone.

To sum up, it is clear that H&M’s marketing claims about sustainability are misleading and are not supported by evidence. I believe that there should be strict regulation for labelling companies’ products “sustainable”, as currently, the term is used more for marketing purposes, rather than for describing the company’s strategy.

Resources:
https://www.eco-stylist.com/how-sustainable-is-hm/
https://balkangreenenergynews.com/fast-fashion-giant-hm-accused-of-greenwashing-in-us-lawsuit/
https://www.just-style.com/news/hm-under-fire-in-us-over-sustainable-material-claims/

Pictures:
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/what-hm-doesnt-want-you-to-be-conscious-about_b_581252a3e4b09b190529c1fe
https://scandasia.com/hm-opens-new-store-in-vietnam/

»

Spam prevention powered by Akismet