Contextualizing Gaps in our Understanding of Professional Learning Communities’ (PLCs) Unique Features

Summary of SyMETRI Meeting: June 24th, 2024 by Qiaochu Xu
Presenter/Guest Speaker: Shahidul Islam from Department of Curriculum and Pedagogy, University of British Columbia
Date: June 24th, 2024
Host: Dr. Cynthia Nicol

At the SyMETRI meeting on June 24th, 2024, Shahidul Islam shared with us about his master’s research which endeavoured to contextualize gaps in our understanding of Professional Learning Communities’ (PLCs) unique features. His study focuses on secondary science teachers in British Columbia and Bangladesh, examining key PLC features, their impact on Knowledge for teaching (K4T) growth, challenges faced by teachers, and how PLCs help address these challenges.

His study employed an explanatory sequential mixed-method design, starting with a survey of 100 participants (50 per region) through purposive sampling, followed by semi-structured interviews with 10 participants (5 per region) using convenience sampling. Data analysis included descriptive statistics for quantitative data and thematic analysis for qualitative insights.

Shahidul shared varying degrees of responses to the salient PLC features in both regions. Bangladeshi teachers emphasize features like student focus, shared goals, reflective practices, fostering belonging, sharing resources, continuous improvement, open communication, and data-informed decision-making more than their counterparts in BC. However, British Columbian educators value collaborative problem-solving and mutual respect comparatively more than Bangladeshi educators. The biggest discrepancy is in distributed leadership skills, which are less valued in BC compared to BD. Both regions benefit from PLCs’ resource sharing, new teaching strategies, understanding of student needs, technology integration, self-reflection, and staying updated on educational trends for K4T growth.

On the other hand, Bangladeshi teachers face more challenges, such as lack of technology access, student readiness, pedagogical inertia, blending technology, designing assessments, and lack of support, while BC teachers moderately agree on these. Technical issues, limited knowledge, evolving technology, and lack of confidence are almost equally addressed in both regions. PLC participation helps overcome these challenges through networking, collaboration, technical assistance, affordable tech solutions, resource sharing, confidence building, and tailored instruction, enhancing teaching practices and embracing evolving pedagogies. By leveraging the benefits of PLCs, educators can enhance teaching practices, meet the needs of diverse learners, and embrace the rapidly evolving technology-enhanced pedagogies.

Here are some slides from his presentation:

Shahidul provided valuable insights from his research, highlighting key features of Professional Learning Communities (PLCs), their challenges, and how these vary between teachers in Bangladesh and British Columbia. His contributions shed light on potential strategies for designing and implementing effective PLCs for teachers moving forward. During the SyMETRI meetings, members engaged in thorough discussions about the data collection process, the recruitment of participants, and the methods of data analysis. The discussions also addressed strategies for overcoming the challenge of recruiting sufficient candidates for surveys. Further discussions focused on the best approaches to inviting participants for interviews, ensuring a diverse and representative sample that would enrich the research findings. These dialogues are instrumental in ensuring the robustness and reliability of our data collection and analysis processes.

Bio

Shahidul Islam is a MA student in the Department of Curriculum and Pedagogy here at UBC. Shahidul just defended his thesis June 13th. Congratulations Shahidul!

Problems with Purpose – Highlighting the connection between mathematics and our collective responsibility to Truth and Reconciliation

Summary of SyMETRI Meeting: June 10th, 2024 by Stéphanie La France
Presenter/Guest Speaker: Judith Koeller from Peace and Conflict Studies, University of Waterloo
Date: June 10th, 2024
Host: Dr. Cynthia Nicol

At the SyMETRI meeting on June 10th, 2024, Judith Koeller shared about her work at The Centre for Education in Mathematics and Computing (CEMC). The CEMC has had many conversations with teachers who are Indigenous, and teachers who teach in Indigenous communities about how the CEMC could support the calls of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Judith emphasised the importance of language noting that it is a vital part of culture, and that colonialism has and continues to contribute to language suppression. Similarly, math has an impact and a role to play which raises many issues and implications for Truth and Reconciliation in math education.

In planning for, designing and sharing the Problems with Purpose series, the CEMC wanted to focus on contextualizing mathematics problems in a way that highlighted our collective responsibility and aligned with the TRC Calls to Action. This meant collaborating with teachers and educators who identify as Indigenous to create two volumes of math problems. One theme that emerges and reemerges is that math lacks context much of the time and that a focus of math on the lived experience and day to day life from which math emerges. Through the process, the CEMC commissioned IndigiQueer Anishinaabe artist Bangishimo (they/them) to take photos from which math problems would be developed including a photo of Bird Safe Glass. Additionally, Dr. Ed Doolittle from First Nations University provided inspiration for a math problem centred around the Cree language.

In discussion about the presentation, Judith shared that a good math problem is open-ended with low floor-high ceiling, aligns with curriculum, includes accessible wording and includes information in both pictorial/diagrammatic and text form. She shared that one of the challenges is that as soon as you get a rich context the problem text often becomes too wordy. Additionally, writing and creating problems that honour Indigenous knowledges and avoids appropriation involves an ongoing process of learning, tweaking, and reflecting. The CEMC hopes to continue developing math problems for Grade 3-12 and lead enrichment and curriculum work in collaboration with volunteers. After this wonderful session about creating purposeful math problems, we are left inspired to contemplate: How do we create a meaningful story/hook in a problem? Why do/should we care about meaningful context in math problems? What is the emotional and lived connection that we might bring into the learning and doing of math?

Here are some photos of Judith’s presentation:

For more information, see the following resources:

CEMC Problems with Purpose website: https://cemc.uwaterloo.ca/resources/problems-with-purpose.php

IndigiQueer Artist Bangishimo’s website: https://www.bangishimo.ca

Video of Dr. Doolittle’s talk that inspired a math problem: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZ-ctdoj_mM

Bio

Judith Koeller has been on faculty at Waterloo since 2003, before which she worked in the high tech industry for seven years. Along with teaching in the Math undergrad and Masters for Mathematics Teaching programs, she conducts workshops in Mathematics for high school students and teachers, across Canada and internationally. She is particularly interested in how math can make a difference in the world, and the implications of Math for peace.

Climate Change Education (CCE) and the Practice in Schools

Summary of SyMETRI Meeting: May 27th, 2024 by Stéphanie La France

Presenter/Guest Speaker: Dr. Travis Fuchs, Researcher in Residence and Science Teacher at Crofton House School and an Honorary Norham Fellow at the University of Oxford
Date: May 27th, 2024
Host: Dr. Cynthia Nicol

At the SyMETRI meeting on May 27th, 2024, Travis Fuchs shared his research on Climate Education (CE) and how he continues to engage with this work in his teaching and mentoring practice. Travis shared that recognizing climate change as an issue of our time, and more notably, acknowledging its critical effects and impacts, was the first step to the development of climate change education. He further noted that school policy and curricular standards reflect the acknowledged importance of sustainability, stewardship, and climate education which center around being good care takers—something that the xʷməθkʷəy̓əm (Musqueam) and Indigenous peoples of Canada have always done and continue to do.

CE and active stewardship emerge within practice in different ways. Travis investigated student perspectives, teachers’ perspectives, and climate education in practice to determine the state of climate education in BC, and specifically, at his school. He found that senior students perceived the climate crisis with complacence, apathy, frustration, and motivation. They wanted to see action but believed it to be unattainable. In comparison, junior students regarded the climate crisis with worry, sadness, guilt, motivation, and hope. When they see action, they feel positive, but they believe that not enough is being done at the school. In practice, he found that nearly 50% of teachers are engaging in climate education activities; however (and surprisingly), of the various subjects, science teachers engaged the least.

Given his research into the implementation of climate change activities in practice, Travis further explored possible reasons why teachers may not be engaging with CE. He found that when CE was in action, it was done well but that generally, it was not engaged with enough. He found that teachers felt ill-prepared and lacked self-efficacy in implementing CE principles despite their alignment with curriculum. This has led him to wonder: How do we become more prepared? Travis inspired us all to contemplate how we might further support pre-service and in-practice teachers so that CE becomes more prevalent in schools. He shared the following resources with us:

Government of Canada: Toward a National Framework for Environmental Learning: Discussion Paper

Student-led campaign: Reform to Transform

Here are some photos of Travis’ presentation:

Bio

Travis T. Fuchs received his PhD in Curriculum Studies from the Faculty of Education at UBC. He is Researcher in Residence and Science Teacher at Crofton House School and an Honorary Norham Fellow at the University of Oxford. His current projects include teachers’ engagement in and with research as forms of professional development, teacher climate change education, expanding teacher recruitment pipelines, and instructional approaches which leverage socioscientific issues in science learning contexts.

Aestheticizing Mathematics and a Novice Research Method

Summary of SyMETRI Meeting: May 6th, 2024 by Qiaochu Xu

Presenter/Guest Speaker: Dr. Canan Gunes from the Department of Curriculum and Pedagogy, Faculty of Education, UBC
Date: May 6th, 2024
Host: Dr. Cynthia Nicol

Postdoctoral fellow Canan Gunes presented her recent study exploring how an expanded understanding of the senses matters to mathematics education research. Canan introduced the notion of aestheticizing mathematics and a novice research method designed to investigate the mathematical sensorium.

Multiplicative thinking involves understanding mathematical concepts through different representations. For example, many-to-one correspondence can be illustrated by plates and apples, where one plate with two apples, multiplied by four plates, results in eight apples (Vergnaud, 1988). Similarly, two unit counts demonstrate that 4 x 2 equals 8 (Davydov, 1992). In exploring these concepts, the various tonalities of bodily movements likely form part of subconscious sensations, which help develop meanings of multiplication.

Re-enactment assists in capturing these tonalities, leading educators to consider asking students, “What are you feeling?” instead of only “What are you thinking?” Re-enactment as a research method can provide material and methods for ensemble learning, as demonstrated in large-scale dance performances where mathematical concepts are enacted (Vogelstein et al., 2019). Additionally, aestheticizing multiplication explores how senses are mobilized in the process of understanding mathematics, prompting researchers to question how we sense the sensing. This is particularly relevant in research questions examining how multiplicative thinking emerges with tools like TouchTimes.

Here are some slides from Canan’s Presentation:

Bio

Dr. Canan Gunes currently serves as a postdoctoral fellow in the Department of Mathematics Education at Simon Fraser University and as a sessional instructor in the Department of Curriculum and Pedagogy at the University of British Columbia. Her background includes a Ph.D. degree in Mathematics Education from Simon Fraser University and a Master’s degree in Primary Education from Bosphorus University. Before her Master’s studies, she taught mathematics at the elementary and middle school levels in Istanbul, Turkey. Her research focuses on teacher learning and noticing, the integration of digital technologies in math education, and the influence of language on the teaching and learning of mathematics.

 

What Even is Math?

Summary of SyMETRI Meeting: April 22nd, 2024 by Qiaochu Xu

Presenter/Guest Speaker: Danielle Antoniazzi from the Department of Curriculum and Pedagogy, Faculty of Education, UBC
Date: April 22nd, 2024
Host: Dr. Cynthia Nicol

At the SyMETRI meeting on April 22nd, 2024, master’s student Danielle Antoniazzi presented her capstone project, “What Even is Math?”, which investigates middle school students’ perceptions of mathematics and their perceptions of mathematics learning when participating in collaborative, cross-curricular projects. The presentation provided some context for her capstone project, then review the methodologies and key findings of her research.

At Danielle’s school, there is a noticeable gender disparity in enrollment for certain STEM classes. In the Chemistry class, the student body comprises 5 female students and 6 male students, suggesting a relatively balanced gender distribution. However, the Pre-calculus 12 class presents a stark contrast, with no female students and all 6 spots occupied by male students. This significant difference highlights potential gender-based preferences or barriers within the school’s STEM curriculum, necessitating Danielle’s further investigation and action to encourage more balanced participation.

Key findings of Danielle’s capstone indicate that both female and male students hold a limited view of mathematics. Female students demonstrate lower confidence, interest, and persistence, along with less expert-like attitudes towards mathematics.

Here are some slides from her presentation:

Members of SyMETRI discussed their experiences learning and teaching mathematics at the high school level. They noted that their confidence, mindset, and interest shifted as courses became more challenging. Questions were also raised about how the results compare with existing literature, and what modifications Danielle would consider if she were to implement the study again in a single-gender school.

Bio

Danielle Antoniazzi is a MEd student in the Department of Curriculum & Pedagogy in the Faculty of Education at UBC. Her interests include promoting gender equity in STEM and math education. She is the senior math and science teacher at Kamloops Christian School.

Working on the Ethical Approval (RISe) for Capstone Project-Counting on Experience: Exploring Mathematics Utilization in the Lives of Older Adults

Summary of SyMETRI Meeting: April 8th, 2024 by Qiaochu Xu

Presenter/Guest Speaker: Lida Espinosa from the Department of Curriculum and Pedagogy, Faculty of Education, UBC
Date: April 8th, 2024
Host: Dr. Cynthia Nicol

At the SyMETRI meeting on April 8th, 2024, master’s student Lida Espinosa shared her experiences as a mature student and discussed the rewarding yet challenging aspects of working on a capstone project that requires ethical approval. Lida shared her experiences and offered some tips for students who will need to obtain ethical approval (BREB) for their studies. Currently, the project is in the initial stage of submitting the RISE application.

Her project is titled “Counting on Experience: Exploring Mathematics Utilization in the Lives of Older Adults.” For this project, Lida intends to gather stories from adults over the age of 65 about their relationship with mathematics and how they utilize it in their daily tasks. She is curious to discover whether these individuals actively avoid engaging with mathematics, view it as unnecessary, or if their attitudes towards mathematics deter them from exploring math-related topics.

Here are some slides from Lida’s presentation:

During the SyMETRI meeting, members participated in an engaging discussion about alternative terms for referring to the demographic group targeted in Lida’s project. Suggestions included “mature adults,” “elders,” and simply “people over age 65.” Another suggestion was to describe them as “people born before 1960,” which emphasizes the subtle differences between these terms.

Bio:

Lida serves as a Senior Learning Consultant at a software company in Vancouver, BC, Canada, where she oversees the development of training courses in a multicultural environment. She is currently pursuing an MEd in Mathematics Education. Previously, while living in Colombia, South America, she taught mathematics to high school students. When not working or studying, she enjoys spending time with her son and husband. Their favorite activities include walking, going to the beach, sleeping, and watching movies.

The Onlife Educator: Borders and Bits

Summary of SyMETRI Meeting: March 25, 2024 by Qiaochu Xu

Presenter/Guest Speaker: Kieran Forde from the Department of Curriculum and Pedagogy, Faculty of Education, UBC
Date: March 25, 2024
Host: Dr. Cynthia Nicol

At the SyMETRI meeting on March 25, 2024, PhD candidate Kieran Forde from Technology Education invited us to consider our own understanding of privacy and how this is related to our experience onlife; how others might encounter us online and whether we have (or could have) any agency over this.

Kieran’s presentation was titled “The Onlife Educator: Borders and Bits.” Like our health, our privacy is something we may not give much thought to until we are given reason to do so. And, as with our health, sometimes it is “too late” to address a problem by the time we learn of it. As such, similar to health insurance, privacy is something we need to consider before a problem arises.

Kieran Forde shared insights from Cory Doctorow’s 2024 McLuhan lecture on “enshittification,”and Carissa Véliz’s book “Privacy is Power,” which advocates for reclaiming control of personal data to restore democracy and counter data-driven power imbalances. He also provided practical tips on enhancing privacy protection, such as using SIM cards, non-trackable emails, VPNs, and pre-paid credit cards for undesirable subscriptions.

He highlighted the work on the Digital Tattoo project emphasising digital rights and responsibilities, urging individuals to think critically about their online presence and the management of their digital identities. This initiative aims to empower users to make informed choices about their digital interactions. Kieran also discusses the role of Google Knowledge Panels in shaping online identities. He shared his personal experience with claiming his knowledge panel to influence its content and presentation on Google. This effort underscores the importance of actively managing one’s digital footprint in the broader context of internet identity and privacy issues, illustrating how digital tools can both challenge and reinforce personal agency online.

SyMETRI members observed that privacy considerations are not yet prominently included in the digital literacy curriculum, highlighting a gap in education that needs to be addressed. Additionally, they raised concerns about the potential for “brainwashing” generative AI, noting the risk of misinformation being used to manipulate these systems.

Bio

Kieran Forde is a PhD candidate in the Department of Curriculum & Pedagogy at the University of British Columbia. His PhD research explores connections between the Right to Be Forgotten and education, especially as it pertains to the increasing commodification of children as data subjects.

 

Explore Generative AI and ChatGPT in Education

Summary of SyMETRI Meeting: March 11th, 2024 by Qiaochu Xu

Date: March 11th, 2024
Host: Dr. Cynthia Nicol

The SyMETRI meetings held on March 11th, there was a comprehensive exploration of the multifaceted effects and applications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the education. SyMETRI members shared insights on how AI could revolutionize teaching and learning, while also voicing concerns about challenges such as maintaining the accuracy of AI-driven academic support and mitigating students’ over-reliance on AI technologies. This over-reliance was identified as a potential threat to their independent learning capabilities and could diminish their critical thinking skills.

Ethical considerations were prominently featured, addressing issues such as ensuring equitable access to AI-facilitated learning resources and the implications of AI systems assimilating primary research findings into their databases without permission etc. Additionally, concerns about privacy issues in the context of AI utilization were discussed.

Here are some slides from the discussion:


SyMETRI group members also discussed practical prompts for utilizing ChatGPT in academic writing. Moreover, UBC library contributed guidelines on citing content derived from Generative AI and ChatGPT, ensuring academic integrity and the appropriate acknowledgment of AI-assisted contributions. Another highlighted resource was scite.ai, a platform designed to assist with literature reviews. By providing insightful analytics on research papers, scite.ai offers researchers and students a valuable starting point for delving into new subject areas.

Artificial Intelligence in Education: Learning from Teachers’ Perspectives

Summary of SyMETRI Meeting: February 12th, 2024 by Qiaochu Xu

Presenter/Guest Speaker: Rachel Moylan from the Department of Curriculum and Pedagogy, Faculty of Education, UBC
Date: February 29th, 2024
Host: Dr. Cynthia Nicol

In SyMETRI meeting on February 29th, 2024, PhD student Rachel Moylan shared her insightful study conducted in British Columbia, Canada, shortly after the public release of ChatGPT.

Rachel’s work was titled “Artificial Intelligence in Education: Learning from Teachers’ Perspectives.” This study aimed to understand teachers’ experiences navigating the complex landscape of AI in education, teachers’ experiences of their relationships to AI and other digital technologies, and the ways in which teachers’ experiences concerning AI in education are sociotechnically co-constituted. Though it is promoted by some in the educational technology industry as a neutral tool (e.g., Cohen, 2023), ChatGPT’s perceived capacities for ideation, analysis, and written composition raise questions concerning human capabilities and the future of humanity.

Here are some slides from her presentation:
During the session, SyMETRI participants actively engaged in discussions about the challenges and ethical concerns related to using AI in educational settings. They delved into specific ways educators could thoughtfully and effectively incorporate ChatGPT in subjects such as math, science, and English for non-native speakers. These conversations highlighted the groups’ need to understand both the technical functionalities of AI tools like ChatGPT and their wider impact on creating fair and productive learning spaces.

Bio
Rachel Moylan is a PhD student in the Department of Curriculum & Pedagogy in the Faculty of Education at UBC. Her PhD research is focused on understanding power relations within complex sociotechnical ensembles and understanding what it is like to be a human within such ensembles. She is especially interested in understanding the human-algorithm relationship in the context of teacher education and is developing a postdigital ethnographic methodology that includes iterative artistic interventions intended to provoke new ways of thinking and becoming in relation to algorithmic systems.

What’s Worth Solving? An Expert Study to Identify Problem-Finding Strategies Within Socio-Scientific Issues

Summary of SyMETRI Meeting: February 12th, 2024 by Qiaochu Xu

Presenter/Guest Speaker: Balraj Rathod from Department of Curriculum and Pedagogy, Faculty of Education, UBC
Date: February 12th, 2024
Host: Dr. Cynthia Nicol

In the SyMETRI meeting on February 12th, 2024, PhD student Balraj Rathod presented insights from his work conducted in India at the International Society of the Learning Sciences Annual Meeting 2022.

Balraj’s paper is titled: ‘What’s Worth Solving? An Expert Study to Identify Problem-Finding Strategies Within Socio-Scientific Issues.‘ The complexity of socio-scientific issues permeates through society’s social, political, cultural, environmental, and economic fabric. However, the question arises: how do we navigate these intricacies to identify the problems that require action? Balraj explores problem-finding processes through a modeling study wherein three STEM domain experts negotiated the controversial issue of a plastic ban in Mumbai, India. His findings indicate that the strategic use of collaborative argumentation and socio-scientific reasoning competencies can aid in identifying problems worth solving.

Here are some slides from his presentation:

Balraj also generously shared his strategies for proceeding from a paper to a conference and ultimately to publication. SyMETRI members actively engaged in the discussion, asking questions regarding his methodology, reasons for choosing the experts in his study, and suggestions for improving the research method. As his doctoral dissertation builds on this work, conversing with the SyMETRI members provided a valuable venue for garnering new ideas.

Bio

Balraj Rathod is Ph.D. student in Curriculum Studies focusing on science and environmental education. His research interest is understanding how critical literacies can be extended to foster emancipatory agency for youth climate action in Mumbai, India (i.e., how to go from concern for the environment to action). He uses narrative inquiry and phenomenological approaches to draw the essence of what it means ‘to protect the natural world.’