Tag Archives: Constructivism

Constructivism in Action

Last week, as part of an online conference for a course on learning theories and their application to online learning environments (ETEC512), I co-hosted a conference on Twitter.  There were three of us working on the presentation, and we thought a great deal about how we wanted to present the theory of constructivism as it related to online learning communities.  We met several times on Google Hangouts to sift through all of our ideas and were undecided until I had a brainwave one morning while driving down the highway en route to picking up my children from school.  I sent my classmates a voice memo as I was driving (multi-tasking is a mother’s forte) and we were off to the races.

ConstructivismIt was, without a doubt, one of the most rewarding group experiences I have had during this program to date. The level of collaboration, and the suggestions from the OLC that we tapped into on Twitter were so diverse! We had experience tweeters and newbies alongside each other, sharing good practice, and looking at constructivism from so many perspectives. The dialogue on both Twitter and through comments on the blog itself, allowed us to build a shared understanding of what constructivism in OLCs looks like in practice.

In the end, we were very pleased with the conference and I think we were able to achieve our goal.  At the end of the week, we created two tools that I would like to share here.

Our Pinterest page, compiling all the resources shared throughout the week:

PinterestThe conference’s Twitter posts on Storify:

StorifyI am moderating a workshop at the moment, and we were discussing how to use process journals with students in a paperless environment.  One of the participants remarked that, although she was certain there were plenty of options available to students today, she would need a lesson in how to set something up online for them to use.  I suggested that we could also use the tools that we have available to us already, rather than complicating the situation.  That is exactly what we did here – we were searching for a way to allow conference participants to contribute to a shared understanding of our topic, and trying to think of ways to do this online (blogs, discussion forums, google docs, Padlet, etc.)… but in the end, it worked so incredibly well to use something that is already a part of so many people’s lives. Why reinvent the wheel?

1 Comment

Filed under constructivism, Education, Online Learning Communitieis, Teacher Collaboration, Twitter

Reflections on Constructivism

In one of my courses, I was asked to reflect on the following quotes from Ernst von Glasersfeld, the philosopher who came up with the idea of ‘radical constructivism’, and explain what I think they mean for constructivist teaching methods:

“… to assess the truth of your knowledge you would have to know what you come to know before you come to know it”. (p.37)

“… it appears that knowledge is not a transferable commodity and communication not a conveyance”. (p.48)

I struggled with the above quotes for some time, but then I saw what he was trying to say, and thought about this in relation to my own teaching practice.

Constructivism, in its purest form, would argue that knowledge is not something that can be passed on from one mind to another, but rather that it is something that is built from experiences.  Von Glasersfeld, who was on the more radical side of constructivism, argued that knowledge comes from experiencing something, and from building upon prior knowledge and experiences to create meaning from every new experience. The quote, “To assess the truth of your knowledge you would have to know what you come to know before you come to know it”, illustrates constructivist theory in its radical state.  Von Glasersfeld is arguing that there are no ultimate answers to the mysteries of life.  If someone claims to know the truth of something, it would mean that they would have had to know something fully before they had even developed an understanding of it; otherwise, how could they possibly be in a position to evaluate the truth of the knowledge they had just come to learn?  He is arguing against the traditional approach to education, where a teacher imparts “knowledge” to the student.  Constructivist teaching allows the student to build their knowledge through questioning, and through experience.  They must experience it to understand it.  “It appears that knowledge is not a transferable commodity and communication not a conveyance”, he says.  Students are not empty vessels to be filled, and talking to them isn’t going to help them understand anything.  Constructivism encourages teachers to find out what their students already know, and to guide them as they ask questions and find the answers to those same questions.  Their role is not to impart wisdom or knowledge, but rather to guide and direct their students along their path to finding information that is relevant and meaningful to their lives.

For those interested in hearing more of what von Glasersfeld has to say, have a look at this short interview with him.

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YozoZxblQx8]

Von Glasersfeld, E. (2008). Learning as a Constructive Activity. AntiMatters, 2(3), 33-49.
Available online: http://anti-matters.org/articles/73/public/73-66-1-PB.pdf

2 Comments

Filed under Education