02/5/17

Is Narcissism Really Charismatic?

From clintonpower.com


In everyday life, narcissism is often portrayed as a negative trait that doesn’t really win you any social points with others. However, surprisingly in Chapter 2 of the textbook, it stated that both leaders and managers tend to be narcissistic because narcissistic people tend to be more charismatic. Perhaps it is because I have not had much real world experience to judge, but simply using my understanding of what a narcissistic person is, I have a hard time understanding why narcissism would an advantage in management.

Furthermore, reading about how toxic bosses may ruin your mental health only reinforces my perception. The article states that people who work for bosses who display “psychopathic and narcissistic traits not only feel more depressed due to the bullying behaviour of their seniors, but are also more likely to engage themselves in undesirable behaviours at work.” Therefore, if narcissistic bosses are causing their employees to feel miserable at work, does that not equate to lowered motivation and job satisfaction? And if so, how is that even supposed to be a good trait?

I personally believe that it is never a good trait for a boss or manager to be narcissistic, at least not at the workplace. While I agree with the textbook on how narcissistic people tend to be better promoters of themselves and are more confident due to their confidence, I think this would be a trait better suited in business negotiations. Bosses who display such kind of attitude to their own workers will only establish a negative and hostile environment. At a workplace, it is imperative to create an amicable atmosphere in order to maximize employees’ job satisfaction and in turn, their productivity. A boss who is narcissism would most likely not be able to accomplish that which is why I do not agree with the textbook that narcissistic bosses are better leaders.

Citations:
1. Langton, Robbins, Judge, Organizational Behaviour, 7th edition, p. 54.
2. IANS, “Toxic boss may ruin your health: study”, The Gulf News, Jan. 17, 2017
http://gulfnews.com/culture/people/toxic-boss-may-ruin-your-health-study-1.1959720

02/5/17

Work to Death

From timeslive.co

Compared to the work culture in North America, the work culture in East Asia has always been notorious for its extremely long working hours. Yet, despite already knowing this hard fact, I was still dumbfounded to hear from my family relative who worked as a software engineer at a large IT corporation in China that his standard working hours were around 16 hours per day. As someone primarily educated in North America, I was more used to hearing about 8 hour work days and the numerous benefits such as vacation pay and health insurances that came with them. Thus, reading about job satisfaction in Chapter 3 of the textbook was of particular interest for me.

In North American culture, job satisfaction is often valued so highly that if people hate their jobs, they will be inclined to quit it even if their wages are really high. However, for many in East Asia like my family relative, the high wages are often so enticing that people will choose to rather toil away each day than to quit. The textbook describes this kind of commitment to be continuance commitment and states that continuance commitment leads to an “increased tendency to be absent and lower job performance”. I believe this statement to be very true because continuance commitment is not really true commitment. Rather it is people feeling the need to fulfill their end of a contract and thus, I have a hard time being convinced that such kind of extrinsic motivation would result in any productive work being accomplished.

Reading a recent article about how many Japanese companies are starting to rethink their culture of long working hours, I feel very optimistic that such kind of culture may finally be abolished. Often companies are too caught up trying to increase productivity of its employees by offering monetary compensation in exchange for more working hours. However, what they do not realize is that all those extra working hours are essentially going to waste because employees are no longer actively engaging in their work. For instance, in the article, Yahoo Japan Corp. is introducing more options of working from home and longer vacation periods in an effort to give the employees more social flexibility. If workers are allowed to enjoy a happy life outside of work, I believe that directly translates into intrinsic motivation to do better at work.

Citations:
1. Langton, Robbins, Judge, Organizational Behaviour, 7th edition, p. 95-100.
2. Oda Shoko, “Japan’s Rethinking Its Culture of Long Work Hours,” Bloomberg News, Jan. 17, 2017,
https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2017-02-06/now-aussie-voters-snub-turnbull-after-leader-s-spat-with-trump

02/5/17

Go Big or Go Small?

Taken from amazonaws.com

For a lot of students like myself, a common dilemma that pops up as we prepare to enter the workforce in a few years is whether it is better to work for a small upcoming startup or a large Fortune 500 multinational corporation. I recall being asked this in my Comm 101 class last term and what really surprised me was how the class was virtually split 50-50 between the two options. Just a decade ago, such kind of debate would no doubt have ended in overwhelming favour of working for corporations. After all, considering the high failure rates for start-up companies, why give up the job security, higher wages and lucrative benefits that corporations can offer right?.

However, with the recent fairytale transformations of once struggling start-ups such as Facebook and Tesla into full-fledged corporations, working for the next big thing is currently a trend for many students and young professionals. Yet, what exactly motivates people to jump from a stable corporate career to the volatile world of start-ups?

Reading the Entrepreneur’s “5 Reasons why working for a startup is a good idea“, I found that the motivations are mainly intrinsic in nature. For instance, the article states that “working in a startup means you are an important member of a small team [and] the unique way in which you approach and solve a problem will be definitely noticed.” In chapter 4 of the textbook, this phenomenon is described as people’s need to satisfy their higher-order needs of self-esteem and self-actualization, which I think is very accurate because working in a smaller setting will inevitably lead to more opportunities of demonstrating one’s skillset and for many, it will allow them to gain the recognition they desired, but could never achieve in the crowded environment of corporations.

Personally, I also think working for a start-up would be a much more enticing option although not because I want to gain recognition. Rather, my intrinsic motivation is that I wish to become well-versed in a broad range of different areas. This requires the job rotations that likely cannot be offered by corporations where the structured environments mean that there are not many opportunities to branch out to do different tasks.

Citations:
1. Langton, Robbins, Judge, Organizational Behaviour, 7th edition, p. 255.
2. PRIYANNKAA DEY, “5 Reasons why working for a startup is a good idea,” The Entrepreneur, Sept. 18, 2015,