Author: jdmiller

I somehow made it to this point in my life without knowing what memeorandum was — my first glance turned up this new article on the career implications of academic blogging:

On the one hand, some resistance to the proliferation of blogs is understandable. The value of academic culture is that it stands apart from the ephemeral marketplace. Universities are by their very nature culturally conservative and slow to change. The odd situation would actually have been if universities had automatically embraced blogging. Holbo suggests that from one perspective, blogging is an affront to the traditional idea of the university. “You want to graft this onto the last living medieval guild system?” he imagines a senior scholar protesting.
But in another sense, academic blogging represents the fruition, not a betrayal, of the university’s ideals. One might argue that blogging is in fact the very embodiment of what the political philosopher Michael Oakshott once called “The Conversation of Mankind”—an endless, thoroughly democratic dialogue about the best ideas and artifacts of our culture. Drezner’s blog, for example, is hardly of the “This is what I did today …” variety. Rather, he usually writes about globalization and political economy—the very subjects on which he publishes in prestigious, peer-reviewed presses and journals. If his prose style in the blog is more engaging than that of the typical academic’s, the thinking behind it is no less rigorous or intelligent.
To take only one other example, John Hawks, an assistant anthropology professor at the University of Wisconsin at Madison, posts three to five essays a week on subjects like evolutionary theory. He writes about science with the breadth of the late Stephen Jay Gould and doesn’t see a big difference between most of his online and offline output. “Much of what I write online is scholarly. When I review an issue in human evolution, it is a genuine review. If I criticize something, I back it up,” he says. Indeed, his essays are festooned with citations.
So, might blogging be subversive precisely because it makes real the very vision of intellectual life that the university has never managed to achieve?

Also features a good overview of peer review issues, of both weblogs and scholarly work.

From a posting made yesterday by Tim Bray:

Here’s a puzzle: what’s the oldest electronic text? Let’s qualify that a bit, stipulating that the text should be substantial in size and essentially unchanged since first committed to bits. I suggest that when this artifact is identified, a paper version should be produced, to ensure that we don’t lose an important piece of our heritage. ¶

If you have nominations for this designation, post them in the comments field below.

Most of you have likely heard about wikipedia by now (and perhaps even cited it in your research)! Over on Slashdot there is an interesting question about wikipedia that has a number of links to questionable practices in other forums for scholarship like peer-reviewed journals, conference papers, etc., followed by a group of techno-geeks offering their impressions of the value and worth of wikipedia. We’ll be taking a closer look at phenomena like wikipedia in Module 4, so some of the points and controversies here might be of interest to the group.
Be warned, Slashdot is not always the most polite of communities (though they are extremely resourceful!).

The British Library has a wonderful collection of books from their collection scanned in and available for online page turning (not scrolling). Take a look as they’ve developed a very nice interface designed to replicate codex experiences. Well, without the musty smell, that is!
http://www.bl.uk/onlinegallery/ttp/ttpbooks.html