Confidence gap and actions

Confidence and action – those seem to be the keywords of the modern age. While reflection before action might be, unfortunately, becoming passe, the current reality is that you have to be able to stand up in a room to be heard.

I read an article called The Confidence Gap from The Atlantic and have been thinking a lot recently about how the vicious circle of less confidence leading to less credibility and thus back to less confidence disadvantages women.

The article summarizes many new interesting research projects on this topic. While women and men generally have the same objective abilities (measured in tests of knowledge etc), men consistently overestimate their skills while women tend to the opposite. In my opinion, this is definitely an outcome of ‘nurture’ instead of ‘nature’.

This difference in self-estimated ability leads to big gaps in the opportunities the two genders strive for. The statistic that I keep pondering is that, relating to applying to jobs, women would apply to jobs when they know they fulfill 100% of the requirements. Men apply when they satisfy 60%.

In our world, nothing can be taken for granted. If you don’t reach out to opportunities, they will never come to you.

I felt this deeply recently because of two incidents.

I had a close friend who has, by various circumstances, now a gap year post university graduation. I suggested she can look into some opportunities here and offered to connect her to some friends who might be able to help. Her reply was that her grades were probably not good enough for the job I was suggesting.

!

I was so surprised I got mad. I didn’t even know that could be an answer to someone offering an introduction. I can’t help but attribute it to how she was brought up as a girl – always wanting to be nice, not wanting to trouble anybody, and not believing in her own abilities.

The second incident came from a friend who is trying to start up a new company. She’s smart, connected, extremely capable, and generally a wonderful human being. Except she doubts her ability all the time. No amount of pep talk seems to be able to expel these torturous self-inquiry sessions.

These are just a few examples compared to many conversations I have with other women. They especially stand out because I have equally as many opposite conversations with men: men who are not as capable as they think (or at least in my judgement), but believe they can conquer the world.

Frustrating, yet nothing will change until we personally pull up our bootstraps and start re-training our brains to think positively and confidently.

That leads me to thinking about how it is best to embark on this massive scale retraining program. The obvious answer is to treat young girls and boys in a gender-blind society. But for people my age, the best solution I can come up with is to “just act.”

Cliched, perhaps, but I really think we, as women in general, tend to think too much. Cut that pondering into half and just take action. We might fail (as everyone does), but at least we won’t let opportunities just float right by.

An analogy is when I started learning to play pool, I took forever to position my cue stick. I also didn’t get many good shots. One time, my friend said, let’s play 3 second pool. Once you have decided on the move and position your cue stick, you only have 3 seconds to make the shot. Surprise, surprise, I actually netted more balls that night.

The motto shouldn’t be “don’t think, just act.” It should be “think less and act more.”

 

Yesterday, I had a chance to grab onto a new project and I just jumped right in. Whether it’s a good choice or not, I’m sure I’ll get good experiences out of it. Self-pat on the back. One step at a time (which seems to be my daily motto these days).


放下+解脫

I write this blog mostly because I love reading through past entries. It’s written mostly for me, about my professional/semi-private life, before any other audience. What would I feel like, in ten years, reading about my thoughts during the last few months?

After being legally separated for two years, my parents recently got divorced. Divorce only equals release (解脫) for the naïve. In reality, the practicalities of life still stubbornly occupy our limited supply of energy. Or happiness.

While I rarely mention it, this rollercoaster of emotions often leaves me suffocated and helpless. I’ve been trying hard to perfect the art of keeping up a constant guard against my emotions, but like an endless, determined stream, it manages to widen the cracks in my armour. In moments of overflowing pain, sometimes I wonder why it’s so hard to let go (放下). Why do we grip on so hard to feelings and histories that refuse to stay? Why do we endure the illusion of holding onto a bright fire, while scalding our fingers?

Seven years. Seven years of listening to increasingly hostile arguments. Of using showers to muffle cries. Of pretending to be strong. Of naively taking sides and letting irreversible time be wasted. I will never make that mistake again.

It’s nice to be able to finally admit all this. I guess, this is also part of the journey.

 


Reading Banker to the Poor by Dr. Yunus

Field work’s been delayed for a day, so I spent my much-needed rest day reading: Banker to the Poor by Muhammad Yunus.

I remember clearly one specific sentence from Dr. Yunus’ talk at UBC when I was in undergrad.

“We took everything from a conventional bank and turned it all upside down.”

This book detailed his start with Grameen Bank and future hopes for a world full of social-consciousness-driven entreprises.

Despite all the criticism that has been leveled at the Grameen Bank (and it’s related entreprises) in recent years, I find their drive and pragmaticism very admirable. I think they represent the type of experiments we need to have in a much larger scale in the development field. Ruthlessly focused on servicing the “real” poor, strong independent spirit, and willingness to maintain a start-up mentality even once established. And trust in young people unpolluted by corporate or public institutional culture to chisel out a new route to organize. (Ha, I don’t fit in this category anymore!)

Allow me, however, to quote:

Where should one place Grameen philosophy in the spectrum of political ideologies? Right? Left? Center?

Grameen supports less government – even advocating the least government feasible – is committed to the free market, and promotes entrepreneurial institutions. So it must be far right.

Grameen is committed to social objectives: eliminating poverty; providing education, health care, and employment opportunities to the poor; achieving gender equality through the empowerment of women; ensuring the wellbeing of the elderly. Grameen dreams about a poverty-free, welfare-free world.

Grameen is against the existing insitutional framework. It opposes an economy grounded solely on greed-based entrepreises. It wants to create social-consciousness-driven entreprises to compete with greed-based entreprises.

Grameen does not believe in laissez-faire. Grrameen believes in social interventions without government getting involved in running businesses or in providing services. Social intervention should come through policy packages encouraging businesses to move in directions desired by society. it should provide incentives to social-consciousness-driven entreprises to encourage the competitive spirit and strength of the social-consciousness-driven sector.

All these features place Grameen on the political left.

I’m a firm believer of “It doesn’t matter if it’s a black cat or a white cat, as long as it catches mice.”

I do not, however, agree that social-consciousness-driven entreprises (SCDE) should be the sole providers and ensurers of social welfare in society. To do away with government except in the sectors of defense and justice etc, is a recipe for an unequal society. Unless we abolish the institutions of inheritance, society will always remain unequal until we systematically (and radically) redistribute wealth. To trust that independently run SCDEs will do an adequate job of redistributing health (and to believe that these organizations will have enough power to actually take wealth from the wealthy) is beyond naive, in my humble opinion. Poverty and inequality is due to unequalness of power. Apolitical pushes to unleash the creativity and entrepreneurial spirit in the poor will never fundamentally challenge power structures, unless we actually deal with the politics.

The problem with the world is not that we don’t have enough wealth for everyone to live with dignity, it is that we refuse to distribute it evenly.


Exam logistics

I deal with a lot of logistics in my work in Tanzania. Mostly it involves trying to make sure about 40,000 student tests are matched to the right student and transported safely back from the field, twice a year. And a load of other things that mostly involves being a polite control freak with the data firm.

It just struck me the other day what an amazing job countries do year in, year out to ensure all their student tests are correctly marked and recorded for national exams.

Can you imagine one wrong mark that could change the course of someone’s life?


The Middle Class

As in most other places, I interact mostly with the middle class on a daily basis, in work and personal life. While the definition of middle class may be changing, there is still a distinct culture that defines those who are not born with a golden key, who obtain a good education, and who take it for granted that the future will be better than the past.

What I have realised eventually is that while it is the middle class and the elites who drive the economy and make decisions on behalf of everyone, they do not necessarily understand the lives of those who they rule over. Just because someone is Chinese, it doesn’t mean that they understand how all Chinese people live. Nor do they fully understand what is “Chinese culture,” especially the day-to-day life of the poor. It’s exactly the same in Tanzania.

I have come in contact with many projects and people who assume that if they have consulted the opinions of “Tanzanians” they have done the work of adjusting activities to fit local conditions. Or if they had held a few workshops around the country, they would have had checked the “participation” box. The truth is, those who are being consulted don’t necessarily know how the other half of the population lives. There are just as many false assumptions and stereotypes about “the poor” in urban, middle class Tanzania as any where else in the world.

Dare I venture to say that someone born with priviledge in Tanzania (or any where else) would know less about how a poor subsistence farmer lives than a good anthropologist who has spent a year living in a village? Some friends I have met have never even set foot in a village, let alone stay for any extended period of time. This applies to many “expat” managers as well.

So food for thought next time when I hear: “this is what (insert certain segment of the population) needs.”


A Talisman

Another round of field work is coming up soon. In fact, I should have left already. As always, there are some glitches with the logistics (which is not handled by me; we hired a data firm). As always, the start date has been delayed for a day or two. Which leaves me some unexpected down time to wonder.

Sometimes, I wonder, in the big scheme of things, is what I’m doing actually going to help make the world a bit better? Or as the quote I saw once at the Gandhi Memorial Museum in Delhi:

I will give you a talisman. Whenever you are in doubt or when the self becomes too much with you apply the following test:

Recall the face of the poorest and the weakest man whom you may have seen and ask yourself if the step you contemplate is going to be of any use to him. Will he gain anything by it? Will it restore him to a control over his own life and destiny? In other words, will it lead to Swaraj for the hungry and spiritually starving millions?

Then you will find your doubts and yourself melting away.

– M. K. Gandhi

I always come back to the same mental picture when I think of this quote. I met a family of a grandmother and her granddaughter in the village I first stayed at when I arrived in Tanzania, back in 2009. The child’s parents had died due to, most probably, AIDS. The grandmother lived in a small, crooked hut that looked like it would fall over any second. I wanted to hang out with them at their house and interview them for my research.

I often wonder how the child is doing now. Is she still going to school? Does she have enough to eat? Is her health still holding up?

A few other mental pictures fly by: the old man living on the street in Hong Kong who mutters incoherently to himself all day long, the clearly mentally disturbed lady I saw wandering around the streets at night in Bongo, the children begging on the streets, the homeless man who said “Welcome to Canada” to me in the downtown eastside in Vancouver…

Then I think about the research program I am working on now. After spending all this money (gosh, that’s a whole other topic I can go on for days), will it actually affect that little girl in the end?

The chances are slim. Probably much slimmer than I can imagine.

But what could I be doing otherwise?

That thought leaves me both sad and determined at the same time.


New home

I have moved homes!

My old blog (http://blogs.landfood.ubc.ca/tiffanyt/) has been forced to shut down, so I migrated to the new UBC blogs site.

I have a new resolve to blog more regularly. Specifically, at least 3 times a week.

(Yes, I know, I have said this many times before!)


I have to admit, I’ve been a bit complacent in my life in Dar.

I know most of the streets where I need to go. The speed bump with the largest hole is over there. The road turns a bit dark in that corner so never walk there alone at night.

I know how to communicate basic daily needs. Greetings (that is a basic need), buying food, making up fake stories of fake husbands, asking directions, eavesdropping, telling people I’ve lived here long enough and don’t appreciate being ripped off.

I know people I like hanging out with. I know people I don’t like hanging out with; and purposely avoid. I’ve become a fast judge of character for new people I meet, but always interested in seeing if my opinion would turn out wrong.

I know when there is a slight hesitation when people answer your questions, you should take the statement and change it to the opposite meaning. “Is it possible to get my letter today?” “Yes…of course” means that you would have no chance in getting the letter.

I know how no plan of how fast things can be done will actually happen. If they do, treat it as a miracle.

The simple happiness of strangers congratulating my Kiswahili doesn’t seem so glowing anymore. The curiosities of stepping on the street and observing people out of the corner of my eye doesn’t fascinate as much anymore. Even discovering a new place to hang out, a new hole-in-the-wall with good food, a new temple, a new street to wander doesn’t give the same rush as a year ago.

I think my itchy feet are starting to itch again. I need to move on. Find something new, something interesting, something I don’t understand. Daily occurrences that make my head tilt and eyes bright.

Granted, I know full well I do not know many stories of the city. I do not know how the vast majority actually live. I try, but I will never fully know. I know that if I were a bit less complacent, I would find whole new sides of Dar waiting to be discovered. But I have a hard time explaining my lethargic reaction.

I’m just tired. The daily struggle of ignoring random comments yelled in my direction, of trying to be safe, of worrying about the newest crime incidents, of walking in the heat and coming home to no water, of hearing the same “heroic” stories from the constant stream of newcomers, of the constant stream of newcomers, of being away from family, of ……

When am I going to get my strength again? Moving to a new city/country just seems so much easier – you have no choice but to go out and explore.


And of course I never kept my promise.

This thing called discipline is such an elusive little rascal.


Deliberate practice on reflection

I just finished reading a book called Talent is Overrated. The main premise is that the traditional way we think about talent is misguided.

We tend to think of those who are talented as having special powers from birth. No matter how hard we mere mortals work, we cannot compete against those who are “chosen.” In reality, success actually comes from a combination of a lot of practising (at least 10,000 hours), a strict deliberate practice regime, and continual practice even once you reach the top.

Theoretically, anybody can take up such tasks and become an expert. The main difference between those who work hard and those who don’t is motivation. That’s when it becomes a bit murky about what causes some people to have extremely high motivation, and hence discipline, and others to be happy staying at the same level throughout life.

The book is not very well written and the research it cites is nothing novel – if you have read “Blink” by Malcolm Gladwell, you’ve read 70% of this book. Yet it really drives home the point of setting up a regime of deliberate practice to work on something you want to improve. Deliberate practice is where you set up practice in a way that makes sure you’re always stretching to the limit of your capabilities. Always working on a specific part of the task that you are weak in and then moving onto the next weakness when the previous one is conquered.

This will not always guarantee success, especially since which areas of expertise will lead you to success is hard to predict. It would, however, ensure that you do progressively improve in the field. The great part of this theory is that deliberate practice can be applied to anything: whether it is chess, management skills, or meditation.

Throughout reading the book, I tried to think of a skill that I would really like to improve to the point where I need to put in 10,000 hours. My motivation didn’t point to skills such as running, playing the piano, photography. I did hesitate on management skills, communication skills, and knowledge in the development field. In the end, the same skill kept popping up as the perfect candidate – reflection.

I would really like to become better at reflection. Able to gain lessons and perspectives from daily life. Able to apply this knowledge gained to other areas of life. Able to stop myself in the middle of a heated moment and reflect on what I am doing. I would like reflection to become an automatic part of me to allow me to continually improve.

I’m not sure if this is a far-fetched idea. I also don’t have much idea on how to set up a strict deliberate practice routine to work on “reflection.”

So far I’ve come up with a very unoriginal idea – really committing to writing one short post a day, whether it is on this blog or otherwise. I would set the alarm for 17 minutes of uninhibited writing of a thought that needs reflecting upon. Then I would spend 5 minutes editing the post after writing.


Spam prevention powered by Akismet