Welcome to the Assessments page of the Sauder Teaching Playbook.
Assessing learning is an integral part of the teaching and learning process. Learning assessments are used to evaluate students’ knowledge, skills, and abilities, and to provide feedback that can help improve their learning outcomes. Sauder Learning Services offers assistance with a wide range of assessment tools and strategies to support faculty and students in their pursuit of academic excellence. We are committed to providing guidance and resources that will assist instructors in designing effective assessments that align with course learning objectives, while also helping students develop critical thinking and problem-solving skills. Explore our resources and services to learn more about how we can support your teaching and learning goals
Formative and Summative Assessments
Formative assessment and summative assessment are two different types of assessments used in education.
Formative assessments are used during the learning process to evaluate students’ understanding and progress toward learning goals, a continuous process that provides ongoing feedback to both students and instructors. They can take many forms, including quizzes, homework assignments, classroom discussions, reflective writing, and feedback from peers. The primary purpose of formative assessment is to provide students with feedback that they can use to improve their understanding and performance.
Summative assessments, on the other hand, are used at the end of a learning period or course to evaluate students’ overall learning achievement. They help determine the extent to which students have achieved the learning outcomes or objectives of the course. Examples of summative assessments include final exams, standardized tests, and end-of-unit assignments. Their primary purpose is to provide an overall evaluation of students’ learning and to determine whether they have met the expected learning outcomes.
Types of Assessments
At their best, assessments are “authentic.” That is, they should measure students’ understanding of real-world tasks or problems relevant to their learning. In this way, authentic assessments evaluate not only students’ knowledge but also their ability to apply that knowledge to authentic, real-world situations that are relevant to their future lives and careers.
Examples of authentic assessments include performance-based assessments such as oral presentations, projects, case studies, and portfolios. These assessments typically involve students demonstrating their understanding and ability to apply their knowledge and skills in a practical context. Authentic assessments are designed to assess not only the content knowledge of students but also their ability to think critically, solve problems, communicate effectively, and collaborate with others. They provide a more accurate representation of students’ ability to apply their learning in real-world contexts and also encourage students to take ownership of their learning and provide a more engaging and meaningful learning experience.
Discussion Forums
Online discussion forums are virtual spaces where students and instructors engage in conversations and share ideas about course-related topics. They can take various forms and are accessed via UBC’s learning management system, Canvas, or other online platforms and can play an important role in assessing university student learning. They provide an excellent, easy-to-use platform for students to express their thoughts and ideas while promoting active learning. Through participation in online discussions, students can demonstrate their understanding of the course material, critical thinking skills, and their ability to articulate their thoughts in writing. Instructors can use online discussion forums to evaluate students’ learning progress by reviewing their contributions to the forum, including the quality of their responses, their level of engagement with their peers, and their ability to provide constructive feedback that broadens classmates’ understanding of course concepts. This information can be used to provide students with feedback on their learning progress, identify areas where they need additional support, and adjust teaching strategies as needed to better meet the needs of their students.
Discussion Forums are, typically, asynchronous. That is, not live. They can be created as an assignment for grading purposes (seamlessly integrated with Canvas Gradebook), or simply serve as a forum for topical events. They are also a great way to establish social interaction among peers, instructors, and TAs in an online course. They allow for an ongoing dialogue while providing the flexibility of participants not having to respond right away (though due dates and other timing parameters are recommended when used as an assessment). Online discussions also offer an opportunity for students to engage more deeply with the content in a (usually) low-stakes way.
For more information on how to setup Discussion Forums in Canvas, please see this page: Setting Up Discussion Forums in Canvas. Or, contact our team in Learning Services.
Assignments
Adding assignments to your course allows you to administer and collect assessments directly via Canvas. Using the Assignments features, you can share the details of the assignment by text, video, or files; set availability dates for when students can view and submit assignments (including managing extensions for students); add due dates; and grade them using the SpeedGrader.
The Canvas Assignments tool allows students to type responses directly into Canvas, or they can upload files or videos as their response. Students can also annotate files that you upload and you can grade those annotations. Depending on your course design, assignments can range from low-stakes (5-10%) to high stakes (40-50% for a take-home assignment). Assignments can be done in groups, pairs, or by individual students.
Peer Reviews
This is an overview of the different tools available for peer review and how they can be used.
1. Canvas Peer Review
A peer review assignment enables students to provide feedback on another student’s assignment submission within Canvas’ Assignments. Peer reviews are a tool that allows communication between students and can help students master the concepts of a course and learn from each other. Peer reviews can be assigned to show student names or display anonymously.
You can manually assign peer reviews or choose to have Canvas automatically assign peer reviews for you. Setting up peer review for an assignment is done when you create or edit an assignment item. See the step-by-step instructions in the Canvas Instructor Guide.
Canvas Peer Review is not recommended for group assignment, as it does not have the flexibility to properly assign submissions to individuals or groups. Any late submissions will need peer-reviews assigned manually. And, peer review comments and grades are hard to download on your own, so please reach out to us at help@sauder.ubc.ca for this data.
2. ComPAIR
ComPAIR is a peer assessment and feedback application in which students first answer/submit an assignment and then compare and respond to pairs of peer answers. For each pair, students pick the answer they think better meets instructor-set criteria (e.g., “Which is better articulated?”, “Which is more accurate?”) and write feedback to each peer.
To integrate ComPAIR with Canvas, you have two choices: to have the integrated ComPAIR tab, or to use the external tool within an assignment. We do not recommend to have both ComPAIR navigation tab and ComPAIR integrated assignment at the same time. If you would like students’ ComPAIR assignment to be a graded assignment, then you should always use the external tool within assignments.
There are several “Gotchas” with this tool. First, groups are not synced with Canvas for group assignment peer review, and students can only be in one group per term. Additionally, the ComPAIR integration must be created first, or the grades will not sync. There is no way to push grades into the system if the integration is done later.
Further information is available on the CTLT guide to ComPAIR.
3. iPeer
iPeer is a web application that allows instructors to develop and deliver rubric-based peer evaluations, and to review and release student comments and scoring. Through iPeer, students assess their team members’ contributions to group assignments. These evaluations can help students reflect on teamwork and their own participation and can help instructors understand how well groups are working together and how much each individual student is contributing.
Instructors can analyze evaluation results and provide students with grades and feedback for their group performance.
iPeer only works for intra-group evaluations.
Please see the following page for more information on iPeer: LT Hub iPeer Instructor Guide.
4. Turnitin PeerMark™
PeerMark™ is a peer review assignment tool in Turnitin (if you have never used Turnitin, please see Turnitin – information for instructors) that allow students to read, review, and evaluate one or many papers submitted by their classmates.
Please see the PeerMark™ Instructor Guide for more information.
5. peerScholar
peerScholar is a peer assessment and feedback application that is able to support three types of peer evaluation activities:
- Classic
Students give/receive feedback to/from a random set of peers. - Case Study
Students will be assigned to different cases (equivalent to being put into groups) and can give feedback to peers who are assigned the same case (in the same group) or can give feedback to peers who are assigned a different case (in a different group). - Group Work – Within Group Work, you can choose between three activities:
- Groups Assess
Students submit their activity as a group and peer assess other groups’ activities.
- Groups Assess
- Individuals Assess
Students submit their activity as a group and peer assess other groups’ activities as individuals. - Group Member Evaluation
Students evaluate group members’ contributions (similar to iPeer).
Regardless of the type of activity chosen, peerScholar has three phases: the Create phase, the Assess phase, and the Reflect phase. Students submit work in the Create phase, evaluate peer work in the Assess phase, and review feedback on their work in the Reflect phase (they may also give feedback to the feedback, or revise their work in the Reflect phase).
Please see the LT Hub peerScholar Guide for more information.
Presentations
Asking students to present their work to the class is a very effective, and often times authentic, way to assess students. Presentations can be conducted synchronously in class, asynchronously in the form of an assignment, or a combination (i.e. recorded presentation, synchronous question and answer period). In addition, presentations can be conducted offline or online, and individually or in groups.
Asynchronous Presentations
Asynchronous presentations are a way for students, either individually or in a group, to take the time to develop and record a presentation and submit it via Canvas. Advise your students to record their presentation via Zoom, or another software they feel comfortable using.
Synchronous Presentations (In-person/Online)
Synchronous presentations are a way for students to practice their presentation skills and create interaction with the rest of the class.
For online presentations, students can present using ZOOM as individuals or in groups. Hosts can allow students to share screens, videos, and audio. Students can identify one student to share their screen and navigate the slides if working in groups. These presentations can also be recorded.
Quizzes, Midterms, & Final Exams
Formative online quizzes are a very useful tool to assess student learning throughout your course. Quizzes can be delivered synchronously (everyone takes them at the same time) or asynchronously (students can take them at any time within a given availability window). Quizzes can be a very effective way to “chunk” asynchronous teaching. For example, students could watch a video recording on a relevant topic, subsequently take a quiz to confirm their understanding, and finally contribute to an online discussion forum. This provides students with rapid feedback on their progress, and it provides instructors with an understanding of student comprehension and engagement levels (which could count as participation grades, for example). Instructors can draw on student performance in quizzes to inform future classes as well (both asynchronous and synchronous).
In this context, quizzes are generally fairly short, and are low stakes (i.e. less than 10% of an assessment scheme) as they are considered a combination of a learning tool and an assessment tool (i.e. formative assessment).
Quizzes can be timed or open, but should generally have a due date. Canvas offers a number of different types of questions that you can ask in a quiz, along with a wide range of options for setting them up for your students.
Canvas offer a guide on building quizzes, which can be found here: Canvas Instructor Guide on Building Quizzes.
Please information on how Learning Services can support your Midterm and Final exams, see the page for Exam Support.