Monthly Archives: October 2014

Assessment Challenges and Opportunities

In my context, I am working with students and teachers in K-5 in a face to face environment where the emphasis is much more on formative ongoing assessments (the process) than putting major focus on the summative assessment which is more a review of students’ overall understanding and their ability to apply their knowledge in a new context. Technology is useful in so many different ways in both formative and summative assessments.

When we do our planning for our units of inquiry through the Primary Years Programme, we always start by using a backwards by design model and planning our summative assessment. We then plan our learning engagements in order to help students be as successful as possible at the end of each unit. One of the powerful tools that teachers use during the summative assessment is personal interviews with each child to assess their understanding. I feel this is best done face to face so the teacher can prompt additional responses based on the student’s answers. However, if technology is used to record these interviews, teachers can train parents/other teachers to help give the interviews and then watch the videos later. Students can then put their interview video into their e-portfolio to then help them with a written reflection and as a way to record their understanding.

“The trick when designing assessment regimes is to generate engagement with learning tasks without generating piles of marking.” (Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2005). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning,page 8).

I agree with this statement on many levels, if teachers want students to practice their basic skills and get prompt feedback, I believe that technology can be a tremendous help, freeing up the teachers time to more readily focus on differentiated teaching based on the results of tests created with technology.

I have used the Renaissance Programme for Reading and Math assessments online. The diagnostic automated feedback provides the individual student’s reading/math grade  based on student answers which is useful for both teaching and learning. The test is designed so that for each answer a student answers correctly, the questions become progressively harder.

Different ways that technology can be used to assess student’s progress is to require documentation of work throughout including drafts of assignments and student reflections, questions and wonderings as they work through their thinking. With my Grade 3 students, they would write weekly blogs to share their understanding and reflect on their learning.

When creating assessment tasks, our goal is for students to work together so that their learning becomes more thoughtful as they share different perspectives while reinforcing their cooperation and collaboration skills.  Opportunities using technology for students to learn from each other can be very valuable. An example from a Grade 4 class using Edmodo, is sharing their learning by students taking turns making and uploading videos to their class page explaining how they solved a math problem. They learn by teaching, and their peers learn from watching an explanation being presented in a ‘kid friendly’ fashion (usually much more interesting and creative).

Students can also use tools such as Google documents or presentations to work on collaborative projects from home. It is important to have a purpose and an intended audience, which is often enough motivation for younger students to do their best job. Teachers can then check in on the group’s projects online and give detailed feedback.

Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2005). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1(1), 3-31. Retrieved from http://www.open.ac.uk/fast/pdfs/Gibbs%20and%20Simpson%202004-05.pdf

Synchronous and Asynchronous Communications

When developing communication tools for developing student interaction, both synchronous and asynchronous tools can be used. I am still working on learning and developing communication tools using our course Moodle platform but will use the following activities as examples.

Synchronous

Developing a schedule where students can prepare in advance and then meet for an online seminar in small groups. An example would be to ask students to choose an article and be ready to give an overview and lead a group discussion connecting back to the learning objectives of the course.  The tool I would use would be the the online seminar tool similar to Collaborate on Blackboard. This way, discussion times and instructions could be set up in advance and students could then meet at the most convenient slot. The advantage of choosing the tool is to make sure everyone has access to it as it is part of the Moodle LMS. The disadvantage is that students may feel more comfortable with a tool such as Skype or Google Hangout.

Asynchronous

An example of communicating in asynchronous time is setting up assignments so that you are  given the opportunity to respond to other students comments. When you submit your assignment (ie- a short paragraph or concept map etc) it goes into the bank of other student responses. You are then asked to reflect on three other student responses and your submitted responses are automatically recorded.

Synchronous and Asynchronous

A live webinar is an example of a communication tool that can be used in different ways. Students who are interested and available can take part in a live webinar where they listen to the professor speak and have the opportunity to ask questions or make comments. If this doesn’t fit into their schedule, they can instead watch the recorded webinar at a separate time.