Linking Assignment: Task 12 – Speculative Futures

Image of an imagined microchipped brain
Image by Pete Linforth from Pixabay

For Task #12 (Speculative Futures), I’ve chosen to link to Abraham Kang’s, Task 12: Speculative Futures task. Abe’s idea of taking his first speculative narrative and asking his reader to paste the text in a free online text-to-speech reader was quite clever.  I thought it lent a bit more gravity to the message Abe was trying to convey.  Though both narratives were quite short I didn’t feel that was necessarily a shortcoming; rather, I thought his message was a lot clearer because his narratives were succinct and to the point.  Additionally, providing his reader with a link to a companion article where one can further explore the idea of microchipping employees (creepy!) was helpful; it provided useful context which helped make the jump from microchipping employees (adults) to students (children) less surprising and more believable.

WordPress

Overall, Abe’s WordPress site is relatively simple.  The colours are high-contrast (which is great for accessibility purposes).  However, his site might benefit from the addition of of one or two menus or options that allow readers to navigate to different points of the site without having to endure the scroll of doom each time they search for a Task.  (The only way I managed to navigate through Abe’s site was to click on the name of the site at the top of the page and then I’d scroll through the list of Tasks he’s created).

In contrasting Abe’s site to my own, in terms of simplicity, Abe’s site ‘wins’, hands down.  Most of his posts are text-based (unless otherwise called-for in the assignment/task descriptions).  As someone who is currently trying to juggle a billion things all at once, this was actually quite lovely.  I could navigate through his posts, read them, reflect and move on.  At times, it seemed that some of his posts were perhaps a bit too sparse:  Task 7: Mode-Bending might’ve benefited from a bit of context, and Task 10: Attention Economy might be interesting with more detail, but again, excessive description isn’t always the point of a particular exercise and so Abe’s tasks are quite ok the way they are.  (Frankly, I admit that perhaps I’m TOO verbose at times….).

Theoretical Concepts

Though not explicitly stated in Abe’s narratives, I think his first speculative narrative concerning microchipped students particularly speaks directly to that innate fear Vallor (2018) discusses in Lessons from the AI Mirror.  Since we know microchipping is something that is already being explored with employees, I don’t think it’s too much of a stretch to imagine something similar being eventually tested on or attempted with students.  Perhaps not elementary-aged students, but certainly starting with higher ed (and trickling down to high school); it isn’t unreasonable to imagine!  I tried to ‘riff’ off what Vallor (2018) discusses as well in both my dystopic and uptopic VideScribe videos.  I wanted to show the darker dystopic narrative, the: what-is-feared-becomes-reality ‘story’ first, followed by the: it-isn’t-that-bad ‘utopic’ narrative, second.  In comparison, I think Abe sticks with a more dystopic (perhaps more realistic?) perspective in both speculative narratives.

(Aside:  As a result of reflecting on Abe’s narratives (and my own speculative narratives), do I really think AI will be all doom and gloom in the future:  No.  Do I think we need to approach our use of AI strategically and prevent big business and the military from dictating/controlling the direction we take with AI:  Absolutely, yes).

Reference

Vallor, S. (2018, November 6). Lessons from the AI Mirror Shannon Vallor.   Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=40UbpSoYN4k&feature=emb_logo

 

Linking Assignment: Task 7 – Mode-Bending

For task #7 (Mode-Bending), I’ve chosen to link to Chris Lam’s The Last Modebender task.  I loved it!  I chose Chris’ task initially because I was intrigued by his use of video for a sound-based task:  I was curious. I also appreciate humour and when I saw the thumbnail Chris had chosen for his video, I figured I’d be in for a treat:  Chris didn’t disappoint!  Although, his poor wife may have selected another image rather than a piggy to represent herself, Chris’ reasons for selecting such an image seemed good-natured and humorous, so I suppose that’s ok.  😉

Multiliteracies/Multimodalities

Chris’ thoughtful use of The New London Group’s (1996) multimodalities to present his audio task was quite clever; through video, he was able to successfully integrate, ” all 6 the elements of design: linguistic, visual, audio, gestural, spatial, and multi-modal.” (Lam, 2020).  However, he was also able to successfully focus on the audio element of the contents of his ‘bag’ (pocket?) through recording the sound the objects made as he tossed them on the ground/cushion.  The idea that those objects themselves can tell a story about Chris’s life, was pretty creative.
For this task, like Chris, I also relied quite heavily on The New London Group’s (1996) concept of multiliteracies/multimodalities.  I think Chris and I are similar in our interest in providing our readers with a creative, unique multimodal experience (showcasing the audio element, of course).  We’ve both included visual elements (Chris with his video, and I with the visualization produced by Voyant Tools) and text elements as well.
Where we differ, is in how we chose to present our audio interpretation:  I used sonification to present a song-like version of Task 1, whereas Chris presented the sound his objects make when tossed on a surface.  Both interpretations tell a different kind of story about the objects we both deem important to us.  Chris’ audio ‘story’ might be more familiar to those viewing (and listening to) Chris’ video, whereas, my sonification might seem foreign and odd to some.  However, both audio interpretations are valid and both tell a story about the objects that are important to the two of us.

Spam prevention powered by Akismet