{"id":291,"date":"2020-08-13T03:19:30","date_gmt":"2020-08-13T10:19:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/virtualkoerners\/?p=291"},"modified":"2020-08-13T17:36:34","modified_gmt":"2020-08-14T00:36:34","slug":"the-name-of-the-trashcan-is-forcible-frame","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/virtualkoerners\/the-name-of-the-trashcan-is-forcible-frame\/","title":{"rendered":"The name of the trashcan is forcible frame"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-285 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/virtualkoerners\/files\/2020\/08\/judith-butler-300x224.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"224\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/virtualkoerners\/files\/2020\/08\/judith-butler-300x224.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/virtualkoerners\/files\/2020\/08\/judith-butler-1024x765.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/virtualkoerners\/files\/2020\/08\/judith-butler-768x573.jpg 768w, https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/virtualkoerners\/files\/2020\/08\/judith-butler.jpg 1500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><em>Some notes on \u201cTorture and the Ethics of Photography\u201d (2007) by Judith Butler<\/em><\/p>\n<p>***<\/p>\n<p>One can easily think that by analyzing photography of torture from the Abu Ghraib camp in Iraq by American soldiers, Judith Butler mimics torture in order to produce certain criticism about it. That is, Butler, in \u201cTorture and the Ethics of Photography\u201d (2007), would fall, somehow, in the predicament of most literary and discursive criticism. This predicament is rightly pointed out by Carlos Alonso, since \u2014according to Alonso\u2014 most criticism merely mimics the same critical stance already depicted by the original work. From this perspective, the forms that the photography of torture from the Abu Ghraib camp has affected society, already point out a severe criticism of American society and of postmodern times. Yet, Butler\u2019s perspective strives to open a place for ethics in this turbulent context.<\/p>\n<p>Most of Butler\u2019s text dwells in an intricate space. While we see how the text is built, that is we witness Butler\u2019s train of thought \u2014not to mention that this text was a public talk\u2014, at the same time we lack a certain point of rupture, or a precise critique of what is really at stake when reading, interpreting or witnessing photographs of torture. I am not saying that the way the text concludes does not address a major problem. If the \u201cnot seeing\u201d, that all of us share, is a conditioning condition for framing our disavowal of ethics when witnessing torture, then, we somehow embrace our norm. This means that ethics, for our postmodern and neoliberal world, <em>no longer care for the other<\/em>. This, for sure, is a big problem. However, it is not clear what does Butler has to say about this disavowal of ethics.<\/p>\n<p>While we read rejections of Susan Sontag\u2019s reading of the ethical force of photography, Butler only addresses the importance of learning where and how what we see \u2014in photography and in reality\u2014 is framed. That is, that beyond the way photography mirrors back \u201cthe final narcissism of our desire to see and to refuse satisfaction to that narcissistic demand\u201d (966) \u2014in Sontag\u2019s terms\u2014, for Butler what is at stake is \u201cto learn to see the frame that blinds us to what we see that is also matter. And if there is a critical role for visual culture during times of war it is also precisely to thematize the <em>forcible frame<\/em>, the one that conducts the dehumanizing norm\u201d (966; emphasis added). The problem of the <em>forcible frame<\/em> is that it is one of many frames that shape, form and sustain photography. In the end, photography would be the space that <em>happens<\/em> between the camera lens and the targeted object. Photography would be a <em>continuum of frames<\/em> and ethics would emerge precisely as a mechanism to force a frame, to decide when and how to cut the continuity of the frames.<\/p>\n<p>Butler was writing in years prior to the boom of selfie. Yet, the soldiers who took the photos of torture were sharing the same thirst and excitement that each of us has when taking a selfie. If reality can be registered by simply pressing some buttons, then, a camera goes hand in hand with desiring production. This means that photography cannot be stopped, since everyone can and will register things the way they want to (or triggered, of course, by the way reality affects them and habituates them). Thus, the criticism of photography should go beyond identifying the <em>forcible frame<\/em>, since knowing about this frame won\u2019t stop us from eating from the trashcan of ideology everyday \u2014as Slavoj\u00a0\u017di\u017eek puts it in <em>Perverts Guide to Ideology<\/em> (2012)<em>. <\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Some notes on \u201cTorture and the Ethics of Photography\u201d (2007) by Judith Butler *** One can easily think that by analyzing photography of torture from the Abu Ghraib camp in Iraq by American soldiers, Judith Butler mimics torture in order to produce certain criticism about it. That is, Butler, in \u201cTorture and the Ethics of &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/virtualkoerners\/the-name-of-the-trashcan-is-forcible-frame\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;The name of the trashcan is forcible frame&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":58235,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[30],"class_list":["post-291","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-blog","tag-photography"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/virtualkoerners\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/291","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/virtualkoerners\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/virtualkoerners\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/virtualkoerners\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/58235"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/virtualkoerners\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=291"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/virtualkoerners\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/291\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":296,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/virtualkoerners\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/291\/revisions\/296"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/virtualkoerners\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=291"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/virtualkoerners\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=291"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/virtualkoerners\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=291"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}