GOAL: To reduce traffic congestion, improve transport services and journey time reliability for drivers, and to efficiently distribute goods and services in London.
Background
The London Congestion Charge was officially implemented in February, 2003. The city of London initially became aware of the traffic congestion problem in the 1990s, when the average travelling speed in central London decreased drastically. In 1995, The London Congestion Charge Research Program, created by the Transport of London (TfL), reported that a congestion charge would not only reduce congestion, but generate net revenue and additional economic benefits as well. They suggested a fare of £4.00 be charged on all vehicles that enter the center London area. In response to this proposal, another group wrote “Review of Charge Options of London”, and argued that an area license scheme would be more efficient at reducing congestion than a fare. After debating and analyzing the scheme for 18 months, Ken Livingstone, first Mayor of London, officially proposed the area licensing scheme to central London on February 17th, 2003. Since then, the congestion charge has been modified nine times to improve the operation and service of the scheme. Under constant review, the rules were last modified in April 2012.
Operation of the London Congestion Charge
Monitored by TfL, and operated by IBM, the congestion fee is charged on non-exemptible vehicles that travel within the Congestion Charge Zone (CCZ) between 7am and 6pm on weekdays in central London. The charge is not effective on weekdays, between 6pm to 7am, on public holidays, and anytime during Christmas Day and New Years’ Day. All payments can be made online or using auto pay, by phone or automated phone service, at a shop, by post, or by text messaging. All vehicles are required to pay the charge once every day regardless of how frequently they drive in and out of the CCZ. The standard daily congestion charge is £10.00, which is reduced to £9.00 if paid with auto pay, and increased to £12.00 if paid by the end of the second day of travelling. Drivers are allowed to pay either on the day of travel, or in advance of up to 90 days; however they will be notified with penalty charges if the payments are not made by midnight of the travelling day. Failure to pay results in a penalty charge ranging from £60 to £187.00- the standard £120.00 penalty charge is cut to £60.00 if paid within 14 service days, but raised to £187.00 if not paid within 28 service days. All rules and charges were updated in April 2012.
The London Congestion Charge Zone (CCZ)
Above is a map of the London Congestion Charge Zone provided by TfL. Cameras are set up at entrances, exits and sections of the Congestion Charge Zone to read and match vehicles’ number plates with database to check if the charge has been paid, or if the vehicles are exemptible or discounted from the charge[1].
Discounts and Exemption
Exemption
All vehicles must pay for the congestion charge unless they’re registered under Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency as National Health Service vehicles, two wheeled motorbikes and sidecars, emergency vehicles (i.e. Ambulance or Fire engine), vehicles used by one or more disabled people or vehicles that have a “disabled” taxation class. Licensed taxi or minicab is also excluded from the charge. Also, certain vehicles, such as registered buses, are also exempted from the congestion charge, under the condition that they must be registered with TfL to qualify. These vehicles include automobiles that belong with Her Majesty’s Coastguard and Port Authorities, the Royal Parks Agency, or the armed forces. As well as selected operational vehicles from the London boroughs and Breakdown Organizations.
Discounts
Residents who live in the area of the charging zone are allowed to register for the 90% residents’ discount; though a registration fee of £10 is required. Also, vehicles that meet required conditions are eligible to apply for the 100% congestion charge discount. Examples include the Greener Vehicles which emit 100g/km or less of carbon dioxide, vehicles with nine or more seats, and motor tricycles that are no wider than one meter, and no longer than two meters, etc. People with Blue Badges are also allowed to register for the 100% discount.
Distribution Effect and Impact of the Policy
Public Transport
One of the purposes of the congestion charge was to reallocate the road space from private vehicles to public transportations. After introducing the congestion charge in 2003, bus waiting time was decreased by 30% in the CCZ, and dropped by another 18% in 2004.
It was initially estimated that public transport would increase the entering rate into London by 3%, and travelling within CCZ by 4%[2]. Surprisingly the rise in the number of people entering London by bus doubled the initial estimation as a result of high cost of congestion charge. This increase in passengers further reduces traffic delays, and increases transport providers’ revenue by decreasing average cost per passenger, which allows the public transit to improve their service levels (i.e. lower bus fares). Improved service encourages more passengers to switch from driving to taking the public transit, which further reduces congestion and increases transport providers’ revenue.
Local Business
The effects of the congestion charge varies across businesses; reduced congestion and travel time could be beneficial to some businesses, but a decrease in car trips is likely to have negative impact on retailers. The survey conducted in 2004 showed that most firms felt the overall effect of the congestion charge on London’s economy was neutral, with positive and negative effects being approximately equal[2].
Residents
Considering the survey conducted on the residents of the CCZ, majority of the residents reported that the congestion charge has either benefited or had no effect on them at all.
Social Costs and Benefit Analysis
When calculating the benefits of the charge, time saving and increasing in reliability of buses and car transportation are two of the most important components accounted for; expectedly there have been evidential improvements in both components. The operation cost of the policy appears to be twice as high as expected, and it represents more than 2/3 of the benefits gained. While the net benefits clearly appears to be positive, the gain is less than most anticipated as the costs represent a substantial fraction of the total revenue[2].
Effectiveness of the Policy
The London congestion charge has been successful both in reducing congestion, and gaining popularity among the people in London. In general, traffic delays in the CCZ has reduced by approximately 30%, with 15% congestion time reduction in traffic circulating and 18% drop in entering the zone during charging hours[2]. Journey time reliability has also increased by about 30%. Despite the historical political resistances British faced in attempt to introduce road pricing in the past, political opposition has been minimal[2]. In fact, the success of the London congestion charge has led the government into considering the possibility of introducing a national road pricing. The Department of Transport estimated that if the London congestion charge was applied to all urban and interurban roads, the charge would be responsible for over 80% of the congestion reduction.
Conclusion
While the studies did not exclusively analyze the effect of the charge on the poor and rich, I personally think that the congestion charge benefits the poor greatly. Since the poor can’t afford to own a private vehicle, they travel by public transport regardless of the existence of the congestion charge. As mentioned, with the charge implemented, more people switch to the public transit, which increases their service levels such as decreasing fare, decreasing waiting time, and increasing bus frequencies, etc. All of these are to the poor’s advantage. Even though the change in traffic composition benefits the poor as well as the rich, the effect of the congestion charge is more complicated on the rich. For millionaires who do not care for the congestion charge would choose the comfort of their private vehicle over public transport. However, successful businessmen might put a high value on time and feel that the time wasted on traffic is not worth them using their own vehicles; though if one hires a private driver, and has the habit of working in the car, the issue with time wasted in congestion does not exist. Hence, there is clearly room for argument in terms of how and to what extent the charge fee affects the rich, as well as how each individual chooses to deal with it. Generally speaking, the amount of rich that chooses to forfeit their private vehicle for public transportation is relatively low. Fortunately only a minority of the population belong to the “truly wealthy” category, that their decisions would not have a big affect the results of the congestion charge.
The London congestion charge has definitely met its stated goals; in fact the amount of reduction in congestion has exceeded the initial predictions, and these reductions were sustained in subsequent periods. As the success story of the London congestion charge wide spreads, and potentially convert into a large scale project. Nations that are trying to imitate London must not neglect that some of the characteristics that London contains are crucial to the successful operation of the congestion charge scheme. London has a well developed and fully functional public transport system, which offers a number of alternatives to the residents. Also, London’s geography allows the city to use the “ring road” around inner London as a suitable boundary for the charge. Not all cities or regions have these characteristics; potential problems could arise when the same congestion charge is applied.
Reference
[2]The London Congestion Charge: http://classes.igpa.uiuc.edu/jgiertz/London-congestion.pdf
Transport for London Official Website: http://www.tfl.gov.uk/roadusers/congestioncharging/default.aspx
http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tfl/roadusers/congestioncharge/whereandwhen/
http://www.tfl.gov.uk/roadusers/congestioncharging/17098.aspx
http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tfl/roadusers/congestioncharge/whereandwhen/assets/DetailMapECCZ.pdf
http://www.tfl.gov.uk/roadusers/congestioncharging/6714.aspx
[1]http://www.tfl.gov.uk/roadusers/congestioncharging/6718.aspx
Central London Congestion Charging Scheme Impacts Monitoring Summary Review: January 2005 http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloads/impacts-monitoring-report-january-2005.pdf


2 replies on “London Congestion Charge”
Vicky! Great blog. I agree with your conclusion. LA has implemented a similar policy however it is too soon to know the impact. My only question to you is about the impact on the poor. What about the individuals who still need to use the roadways and cannot afford the tax? Does the government offer a discounted fare for those with lower incomes? This is what they did with a bridge toll in LA.
Hey Lauren,
Thanks for commenting!
I think the general assumption is that the poor group is incapable of affording a vehicle, so that the policy does not directly affect the poor. For those poor vehicle owners who need to use the roadways can use public transportation and avoid paying for the toll. 🙂