Categories
ETEC 565- Learning Technologies Selection: Design and Application

The benefits and challenges around using technology in the arts and humanities classroom

The benefits and challenges around using technology in the arts and humanities classroom

As it has been highlighted, my MET experience has had a profound impact on my view of Educational Technology.  When I moved to NZ in 2005 after I got married I began teaching in an eClass (13 thin clients and a IWB).  I was terrified of technology- a real technophobe.  My two years there were a steep learning curve as we were part of the ICT cluster project and one laptop per teacher initiative.  I thought of myself as a rather tech savvy educator when I arrived in the UAE to become an advisor.  I have now realized that there was so much more I could have done to really engage my students in technology as part of their education and inquiry learning.  MET has hammered home some obvious and not so obvious benefits of technology in the classroom and now I can hopefully apply these specifically to the arts and humanities classroom.  I would like to use Bates and Poole’s SECTIONS framework (2003) to help me articulate (if you’ll humour me!).

Students: Is it appropriate for your student population?

Absolutely!  There are a myriad of opportunities for students of all ages and walks of life to use ET in the classroom.  Use of ET for humanities and arts enables students to experience issues more visually and can empower them to get involved and/or take interest.  It also enables teachers to cater to different needs and learning styles- and can appease shyness

Ease of Use: Is the interface and design reliable and intuitive to the learner?

This is where there can be challenges.  If there is a lack of training and or support for teachers/students there can be under-utilized equipment.  However, when the support and training is there the opportunities are endless.  Tech savvy teachers (and students- let’s not forget that they teach the teachers and each other) can use the social software that is free and web 2.0 applications that are a mere click away.

Cost Structure: Is the production cost reasonable?

The cost of specialized software and/or maintenance can be discouraging but there are a wide variety of programs available for free to use with humanities and the arts- especially for primary level students.,

Teaching & Learning: Will it enhance learning?

Student engagement automatically goes up- the challenge is ensuring that we are using technology as part of the learning process- to construct meaning and build knowledge- and not just for the sake of using technology.  Affords catering to different learning styles and promotes active learning.

Interactivity: Does it move the learner beyond just reading, viewing and listening?

In the arts and humanities classroom technology can be used to create thought provoking products, to engage in debate with others around the world and to co-construct language products.  It also facilitates feedback from peers through blogs, wikis and other asynchronous communication tools.  Fosters team work and promotes a constructivist classroom.

Organization: Is an effective organizational system in place to ensure that a particular

media or technology is both feasible and practical?

Another barrier- is there an IT technician? An ICT teacher or coordinator who is available to help?  Sign out systems for labs and COWs can be a nightmare.

Novelty: Does it offer a welcome relief from instruction that relies heavily on text?

Remembering that many students are digital natives we have to be sure we are using new and interesting technologies that engage reflection and cooperation.

Speed: Is it quick to implement and update?

Depending on what software and hardware we are speaking of and of course the issue of connectivity- it is likely that the teachers who want to learn and use ET will find the time and those who don’t won’t

+  visual language opportunities, access to social media, flat classroom opportunities, language products, multi-media, historical research, political action, digital resources, debates, exposure to a variety of texts, feedback opportunities

-‘Forced’ creativity, teacher lack of skills, time, curriculum focus, student motivation, access to appropriate software and hardware, connectivity issues, getting them back to pen-paper (like the whiz-bang), training/support

Categories
ETEC 565- Learning Technologies Selection: Design and Application

Picture Day- using video in education

PICTURE DAY, was created by Steve Bognar and the students of Tussing elementary school. One student operated the camera while another student stood in front of the camera acting. Bognar worked with students as interviewers and camera operators. For example, the student operating the camera moved in front of the camera to act while the next student in line operated the camera. This conveyer-belt system allowed every student an opportunity to both operate the camera and act while being filmed. “Picture Day” featured 601 of the school’s students individually posing for the camera with a soundtrack of students discussing the meaning of photographs. Later, the final version of “Picture Day” was edited by Bognar.

After watching “Picture Day,” by Steve Bogner and the children from Tussing Elementary School I would like to tackle these questions with a PMI chart- but since my table formatting abilities are rubbish I will do it as a list.

Plus:

  • Student engagement and empowerment
  • Constructivist approach
  • Integration of technology
  • Critical thinking employed if students were involved in developing the Qs and while answering them (analysis and evaluation)-range of Bloom’s taxonomy and De Bono’s thinking hats employed which enabled all students to participate (in essence a differentiated task)
  • Self-satisfaction
  • Inclusion and freedom of expression
  • It looked FUN!
  • Use of expert-apprentice
  • Being involved in part of a bigger project
  • Introduction (perhaps) to using more modern types of ET for teachers
  • Opportunities for metacognition post-production

Minus:

  • Was likely expert driven- how much did the students really do?
  • Time taken to complete such a project is often a luxury in schools not a reality
  • Did ALL students really get a chance to be actor and film-maker?
  • Very low level use of technology (yes I know, it was 1998!)

Interesting:

  • Great to see all of the editing and tricks (wonder if the students were taught how to do this?)
  • I wonder if the interviews were audio/video recorded
  • How long did it take to compelte?
  • Did the teachers start using more modern versions of ET as a result of this project
  • How involved were the teachers- really?
  • Opportunities to explore the human condition and use the project as a lead in to so many other educational experiences

o   A lead in to crating “A day in the life of ….. video”

o   Facebook comparison

o   The tyranny of photography

o   History of photography and it’s implications (war, evidence of crimes of humanities)

o   Links to the past- family history- sociology/philosophy

o   Human curiosity

o   Comparison- how would children in another country react to this project (critical thinking- pen pal project)

My experience with video

ü  Claymation

ü  Discrepent events- filmed and inserted into PPTs for Science

ü  Student ePortfolios

ü  Moviemaker Photostories with video clips

ü  Travel EXPO presentations

ü  Can I make a better….?  Innovation/invention videos used for The Apprentice type project

Spam prevention powered by Akismet