Categories
Uncategorized

Netflix Engages in “Legal Pirating”

 

Not many movie addicts can say that they have never streamed a movie online. When asked why they do so, most respond that streaming online is more convenient than using other mediums, as it doesn’t require slow downloads or a bombardment of advertisements. Now, media streamer giant, Netflix, has admitted to the public that they utilize illegal piracy sites to decide which shows to buy. From this strategy, Netflix has not only become more profitable, but it has also gained more market power in the media industry. In an interview with Kelly Merryman, Netflix VP of Content Acquisition, she defended Netflix’s content purchasing techniques, as she explained how the company “looks at what does well on piracy sites” when making decisions. Netflix has been long promoting their service as a legal alternative to illegal streaming, where customers can pay $7.99 per month and gain full access to all of Netflix’s content. However, by utilizing statistics from piracy sites, Netflix has an unfair advantage over its competition and is going against its original value proposition of providing a legal service. The company claims to support ethical methods, yet it’s hypocritical actions tell otherwise.

Sources:
 
Woollacott, E. (2013, September 16). Netflix Checks Piracy Stats
Forbes. Retrieved from
http://www.forbes.com/sites/emmawoollacott/2013/09/16/netflix-checks-piracy-stats-to-help-it-decide-what-to-buy/
 
Kleinman, A. (2013, September 16). Netflix Looks at Pirating Sites to Help Decide Which Shows to Buy
The Huffington Post. Retrieved from
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/16/netflix-pirating_n_3934325.html

 

Categories
Uncategorized

The Big Apple Peels Away its Past

Every year, the first week of September indicates the commencement of a new season. This week, all eyes are set on the Big Apple as designer brands from all over sweep the runway with lavish clothing for one of the world’s most prestigious events – New York Fashion Week. In the past, Fashion Week has often caused an uproar among the general public as critics speculate about the usage of size zero models. Many believe that such models, who often suffer from anorexia, promote an unethical message to it’s audience, primarily to young women.

In recent years, Katie Green, a former English model, created “Say No to Size Zero”, which campaigns against unhealthy models with a BMI of 18.5 or lower. Though several renown people, such as Victoria Beckham and Giorgio Armani, support Green’s campaign, not much action has been otherwise taken to promote healthy modelling. However, this year’s Fashion Week proved to differ immensely from preceding years, as we saw the introduction of plus-size models. With the introduction of plus-size models, we should see a gradual downfall in controversies and stereotypes revolving around modelling and the ethicality of it, as the public and fashion houses can come to equilibrium. Like many problems though, there is no quick fix for such an ongoing issue. Now the fashion industry is faced with yet another problem..should they ban models who are naturally size zeros?

 
Sources: 
 
http://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2013/jul/05/vogue-truth-size-zero-kirstie-clements
 
http://www.katiegreenofficial.com/petition.html

Spam prevention powered by Akismet