{"id":1,"date":"2016-03-07T01:32:45","date_gmt":"2016-03-07T01:32:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/wolf\/?p=1"},"modified":"2016-04-01T09:07:09","modified_gmt":"2016-04-01T16:07:09","slug":"write-your-tnp","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/wolf\/2016\/03\/07\/write-your-tnp\/","title":{"rendered":"How to Write Your Tenure\/Promotion Packet: Teaching-Oriented Faculty Edition"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>NOTE: This is a draft; critical feedback, comments, and questions are very much welcome! <\/strong>(Leave a reply or e-mail <a href=\"mailto:wolf@cs.ubc.ca\">wolf@cs.ubc.ca<\/a>.)<\/p>\n<p>If you&#8217;re in academia and teaching is an important part of your job, then you&#8217;ll probably need a teaching portfolio for promotion or tenure at some point. Unfortunately,\u00a0despite the fact that you have dozens\/hundreds\/thousands of students, teaching is often a solitary endeavor, especially compared to research. How, then,\u00a0do you compellingly document your teaching experiences and innovations to others?<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s my advice, much of it inspired by my long-ago participation in the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.engr.washington.edu\/caee\/etpp-sessions.htm\">Engineering Teaching Portfolio Program<\/a> offered by U. Washington&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.engr.washington.edu\/caee\/\">Center for\u00a0the Advancement of Engineering Education<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>I wrote this advice as I was drafting my tenure packet\u2014<a href=\"https:\/\/www.cs.ubc.ca\/~wolf\/work\/tnp\/tenure-packet\/cv.pdf\">CV<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cs.ubc.ca\/~wolf\/work\/tnp\/tenure-packet\/portfolio-with-appendices.pdf\">portfolio<\/a>\u2014and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cs.ubc.ca\/~wolf\/work\/tnp\/pot-packet\/\">promotion packet<\/a>. The tenure packet from Sep 2008 was for promotion from &#8220;Instructor I&#8221; to &#8220;Senior Instructor&#8221; at UBC and, of course, for tenure. The promotion packet from Sep 2013 was\u00a0for promotion from &#8220;Senior Instructor&#8221; to &#8220;Professor of Teaching&#8221;, a somewhat unexpected process since the rank did not exist when I began at UBC. For context, check out\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.hr.ubc.ca\/faculty-relations\/tenure-promotion-reappointment-confirmation\/tenure-promotion-reappointment-for-faculty-members\/\">UBC&#8217;s tenure and promotion policies<\/a>. The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.hr.ubc.ca\/faculty-relations\/files\/Guidelines-for-Promotion-to-Professor-of-Teaching.pdf\">guidelines for promotion to Professor of Teaching<\/a> have the most detail, although they were published well after my tenure case.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Prelude<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Both my tenure and promotion packets are bulky but designed\u00a0to be skimmed. I aimed for a &#8220;multi-resolution&#8221; packet that offers busy readers a short, sweet summary they can read, skipping the rest, but with\u00a0hooks available to dive deeper, all the way down to evidence (artifacts of teaching, evaluation records, research citations, etc.) supporting the claims I make in my portfolio.<\/p>\n<p>One minor caveat for non-Computer Scientists:\u00a0Conference publications in CS are at least as prestigious as journal publications (and often more so). More broadly and importantly, you&#8217;ll want to adjust disciplinary or cultural issues like this for your own context in both my packets and my advice!<\/p>\n<p>Finally, be aware that the\u00a0packets are written to make me sound like I walk on water. It&#8217;s all true mind you, but spun to the max. Don&#8217;t get intimidated; you can sound like you walk on water, too!<\/p>\n<p><strong>Beforehand<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Here are a few steps you can take from the start of your teaching career to prepare yourself for your tenure or promotion case.<\/p>\n<p>1. Be a pack rat. Save everything and file it away. Meeting agendas, notes from students and colleagues regarding your teaching,\u00a0links to\u00a0interesting student artifacts, etc.<\/p>\n<p>2. Write, write, write. Write a &#8220;post mortem&#8221; after each class\u00a0describing what worked well and poorly, write analyses of your exams (how and why you\u00a0planned them and how they turned out), write any commentary on your own teaching that you can motivate yourself to put down.<\/p>\n<p>Doing it all the time will\u00a0help you tremendously as a teacher. Doing it at least sometimes and filing it away will be invaluable for your portfolio.<\/p>\n<p>3. At least once a year\u2014merit review, anyone?\u2014write out a one paragraph story of each major teaching-related effort you make, like course design, new\u00a0pedagogical approaches, student research supervision, and so on.<\/p>\n<p>My mentor Paul Carter suggested this to me and suggested my CV as the place to keep it. Using this approach,\u00a0your CV recaps points in your\u00a0promotion portfolio&#8230; but it also makes the CV stronger and forces you\u00a0to write bits and pieces of your portfolio every time you update the CV. At my promotion, I received strong advice to brutally trim this in the submitted version, but the same text migrated over to the rest of my packet!<\/p>\n<p><strong>Writing the Portfolio<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The writing process itself can take a while on the calendar and a fair number of hours. Get started early, and try out these steps. I started a year or more in advance with the first step below.<\/p>\n<p>1.\u00a0Review some other people&#8217;s portfolios. When I say &#8220;review&#8221;, I mean review like you would a conference or journal submission. Question how and\u00a0whether they&#8217;ve accomplished their main points and mark the document up with recommendations. If the author is still working on their portfolio, this\u00a0is peer feedback, but it&#8217;s worthwhile regardless so that you can discover what makes an effective portfolio.<\/p>\n<p>2.\u00a0Write three crappy teaching philosophy statements, with three totally different philosophies. Don&#8217;t worry; they won&#8217;t go into your portfolio. Their\u00a0purpose is to encourage you to think creatively about what you&#8217;ve accomplished as a teacher and why you did it.<\/p>\n<p>3.\u00a0Make a list of artifacts you can use as evidence of your successful teaching:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Your favorite stuff that you remember.<\/li>\n<li>Anything that catches your eye as you peruse your pack-rattish\u00a0<span style=\"line-height: 1.71429; font-size: 1rem;\">hoardings.<\/span><\/li>\n<li>Things that click with the crappy philosophies you&#8217;ve written.<\/li>\n<li>At least one example of every type of thing (lecture, assignment,\u00a0<span style=\"line-height: 1.71429; font-size: 1rem;\">interactive exercise, demonstration, exam, etc.) you&#8217;ve ever put\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"line-height: 1.71429; font-size: 1rem;\">together for a course.<\/span><\/li>\n<li>Examples of cases where you did\u00a0<strong>not<\/strong> do that well, especially where\u00a0you have the evidence you used to discover the problem and steps you took to resolve it.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>4.\u00a0Throw your crappy teaching philosophies away.<\/p>\n<p>5. Make an &#8220;affinity diagram&#8221; of your artifacts. Put a brief description of each artifact on a post-it note\u00a0and then stick the post-its on a whiteboard arranged into related groups. Look for ideas about your teaching in those groups. Is there a cluster of artifacts that are all about bringing your research ideas into the\u00a0classroom? A cluster about encouraging students to take responsibility for their own learning? A cluster about current cultural references? Whatever.<\/p>\n<p>Give each cluster a title\u2014grab a whiteboard marker,\u00a0circle the post-its, and write a name next to the circle\u2014and take a picture\u00a0of\u00a0the diagram\u00a0you created.<\/p>\n<p>Now, repeat this process a couple more times but intentionally make very different clusters. Hopefully those crappy teaching philosophies you wrote have keyed you\u00a0to be able to view your teaching from very distinct perspectives.<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s a summary I drew while creating my tenure packet of some of the groups in my affinity diagrams:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.cs.ubc.ca\/~wolf\/work\/tnp\/tenure-packet\/contributions-affinity-diagram.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/www.cs.ubc.ca\/~wolf\/work\/tnp\/tenure-packet\/contributions-affinity-diagram-second-smallest.jpg\" alt=\"Small scan of affinity diagram summary.\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Circled nodes are cluster titles; uncircled nodes represent\u00a0artifacts.<\/p>\n<p>6.\u00a0The cluster titles you created represent new themes for a new teaching portfolio developed bottom-up from\u2014and supported by\u2014the evidence you&#8217;ve collected to build your portfolio. Plop down the cluster titles as section headers in a text\u00a0editor with brief notes of its\u00a0artifacts below each one.<\/p>\n<p>My <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cs.ubc.ca\/~wolf\/work\/tnp\/tenure-packet\/portfolio-with-appendices.pdf\">teaching portfolio<\/a>\u00a0for tenure grew out of the clusters in the image above. Compare those circled nodes to these section headers from\u00a0the portfolio: &#8220;Motivated Learners&#8221;, &#8220;Active, Reflective, Social Learners&#8221;, &#8220;Reflective Teaching&#8221;, and &#8220;Practical, Respectful, Efficient Teaching&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>7.\u00a0Flesh out, paring back to the artifacts that really make your point. The best artifacts are the ones that look good in themselves and also support\u00a0multiple clusters effectively, so you don&#8217;t need quite as many to tell your story.<\/p>\n<p>8.\u00a0Now, write a <strong>good<\/strong>\u00a0teaching philosophy to pull it all together into a coherent story.<\/p>\n<p>When you&#8217;re done, you&#8217;ll have a coherent story that describes the most important elements of your teaching with strong evidence (your artifacts) backing\u00a0up each point in the story. The artifacts themselves can be appendices; your audience doesn&#8217;t <strong>need<\/strong> to read these because your philosophy statement will\u00a0reference them in context whenever they&#8217;re needed.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Letter Writers<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>You may also need to recommend letter-writers for your case. For\u00a0my\u00a0tenure case, I proposed <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cs.ubc.ca\/~wolf\/work\/tnp\/tenure-packet\/anonymized-proposed-letter-writers.txt\">six letter-writers<\/a>, a minimum\u00a0number of whom (perhaps 2?) were guaranteed to be asked as letter-writers in my case. My department independently chose the remaining letter-writers. (If you submit a list, know whether their choice is independent of or exclusive with your list! If their list must not overlap yours, then you may want to avoid putting all your best prospects on your list!)<\/p>\n<p>This process was challenging, perhaps more so for assessing teaching than research. After all the main products of research are intentionally <strong>very<\/strong> public. In the end, I made a long list of candidates who I could be reasonably confident were familiar with some aspect of my work, using the sections of my teaching portfolio to guide my brainstorming of names. Then, on advice from my mentors, I added Canadians in prominent undergraduate management or advising positions and filtered out almost everyone who was: (1) not tenured\/promoted themselves\u00a0yet, (2) too well-known to me (e.g., had co-taught with me, co-organized a major event, or co-published something more significant than a panel), or (3) did not have a PhD.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Finishing Up<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Now, get and give\u00a0<strong>lots<\/strong> of feedback until you&#8217;re ready to send it off. Look for feedback from mentors, peers, colleagues, and anyone involved in the tenure and promotion process to whom you have access!<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s one more point that&#8217;s easy to miss; don&#8217;t miss it. Creating your portfolio this way takes a great deal of time and work. One benefit of the work (hopefully!) is tenure and promotion.<\/p>\n<p>But you should also benefit by gaining insight into what matters to you in your teaching and what <strong>you<\/strong> want to do next. Read over this document with fresh eyes thinking about where you want to go in your teaching now that you&#8217;ve sent your case off. After all, you&#8217;re getting tenure or, to be pessimistic, you&#8217;re about to be denied it. In either case, now&#8217;s the time to try something risky and innovative that takes your career to the next level!<\/p>\n<p><strong>Links<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Here are links to the materials I submitted for tenure and promotion:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Tenure packet (submitted as separate documents):\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.cs.ubc.ca\/~wolf\/work\/tnp\/tenure-packet\/cv.pdf\">CV<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.cs.ubc.ca\/~wolf\/work\/tnp\/tenure-packet\/portfolio-with-appendices.pdf\">Teaching Portfolio<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.cs.ubc.ca\/~wolf\/work\/tnp\/tenure-packet\/anonymized-proposed-letter-writers.txt\">Anonymized proposed letter-writers<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.cs.ubc.ca\/~wolf\/work\/tnp\/pot-packet\/\">Professor of Teaching promotion packet<\/a> (submitted as a web-based portfolio)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Here are links to a few other materials that helped me as I made my packets or that I&#8217;ve found interesting since then.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Jodi Tims&#8217; SIGCSE <a href=\"http:\/\/dave-reed.com\/NEW\/Talks2016\/Tims.pdf\">slides on promotion and tenure<\/a>\u00a0from the\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/dave-reed.com\/NEW\/\">2016 New Educators Workshop<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Related articles from the fantastic <a href=\"https:\/\/tomprof.stanford.edu\/posting\/567\">Tomorrow&#8217;s Professor<\/a> series\n<ul>\n<li>My favorite:\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/tomprof.stanford.edu\/posting\/567\">Answers to Common Questions About the Teaching Portfolio<\/a>; includes a list of questions to ask yourself:\n<ul>\n<li>Is every claim made in the narrative supported by hard evidence in the appendices<\/li>\n<li>Is the portfolio sufficiently reflective? Does is include a balance of items from oneself, from others, and from student learning?<\/li>\n<li>Does the portfolio clearly identify what you teach, how you teach it, and why you teach it as you do?<\/li>\n<li>Is a complete table of contents and appendices included?<\/li>\n<li>Does the portfolio contain reflective observations?<\/li>\n<li>Have efforts at growth and improvement been cited?<\/li>\n<li>Are numerical student rating results included for several courses over several years?<\/li>\n<li>Have any department or institutional factors influenced your teaching effectiveness<\/li>\n<li>Would including some charts, tables, or graphs enhance the portfolio?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>Others, vaguely ordered by relevance:\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/tomprof.stanford.edu\/posting\/193\">Writing A Teaching Philosophy Statement<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/tomprof.stanford.edu\/posting\/483\">Building Your Teaching Portfolio<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/tomprof.stanford.edu\/posting\/13\">Items for Inclusion in a Teaching Portfolio<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/tomprof.stanford.edu\/posting\/753\">Making Teaching and Learning Visible<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/tomprof.stanford.edu\/posting\/554\">Making Visible the Intellectual Work in Teaching<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/tomprof.stanford.edu\/posting\/393\">Promotion, Tenure, and the Engaged Scholar<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/tomprof.stanford.edu\/posting\/733\">Personal Philosophies of Teaching: A False Promise?<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>NOTE: This is a draft; critical feedback, comments, and questions are very much welcome! (Leave a reply or e-mail wolf@cs.ubc.ca.) If you&#8217;re in academia and teaching is an important part of your job, then you&#8217;ll probably need a teaching portfolio for promotion or tenure at some point. Unfortunately,\u00a0despite the fact that you have dozens\/hundreds\/thousands of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7560,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/wolf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/wolf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/wolf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/wolf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7560"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/wolf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/wolf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/wolf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1\/revisions\/12"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/wolf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/wolf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/wolf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}