As the economy tanks with\u00a0questions of whether governments, banks, manufacturers, and universities are “too big to fail,” the concept of “shadow systems” takes definition.<\/p>\n
it was riddled with contradictions: ubiquitous negotiations on all levels, informality, and a huge shadow system. (Kisser & Kalb, 2010, p. 173)<\/p>\n
Sound familiar? Zola suggests in the exhilaration, like gambling, of governing through\u00a0a “shadow system– a place where free from outside scrutiny and evaluation a miniature version of the game of life can be played”– “the demands of the outside world seem distant” (1974, p. 61).<\/p>\n
That’s the point– shadow systems provide a sense of control… but within the systems\u00a0“too big to fail” when you get caught, what happens? When that outside world sees what’s going on, what happens?<\/p>\n
In an\u00a0extensive analysis and critique of management and governance models at UBC<\/a>, the Faculty Association Executive\u00a0expresses our<\/p>\n concern about how much UBC business is conducted in such a manner (i.e., “secret, in camera processes” or shadow systems) and hence not captured by FOI requests….<\/p>\n We are deeply concerned by the evidence that a culture exists in UBC whereby the Chair of the Board is personally involved with managing university personnel and their concerns, and whereby back-channels exist between the Board and the University which bypass formal governance structures.<\/p>\n Shadow systems wherein business is conducted that cannot be “captured by FoI requests” have become business as usual, at UBC and the provincial government. In April, we found that \u00a0“the British Columbia government is routinely blocking access to documents that should be made public<\/a> by claiming that the records don’t exist.”<\/p>\n Wary of corruption and cronyism,\u00a0on 22\u00a0October, the Information and Privacy Commissioner for BC released a scathing report of the practice of withdrawing\u00a0decision-making to shadow systems. In\u00a0Access Denied<\/em><\/a>,\u00a0Denham begins:<\/p>\n Democracy depends on accountable government. Citizens have the right to know how their government works and how decisions are made.<\/p>\n This\u00a0holds for UBC, by the University Act<\/em> a\u00a0corporation bound to accountability to its members: faculty, staff, students.<\/p>\n UBC Management, from top to middle (Deans, ADS & Directors) has lost a sense of how to govern faculty, staff, and students. It has also lost a sense of\u00a0judgment of what is important and what is not.<\/p>\n UBC’s shadow systems have now come back to haunt a university\u00a0“too big to fail.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" As the economy tanks with\u00a0questions of whether governments, banks, manufacturers, and universities are “too big to fail,” the concept of “shadow systems” takes definition. it was riddled with contradictions: ubiquitous negotiations on all levels, informality, and a huge shadow system. … Continue reading