{"id":9242,"date":"2012-11-07T09:32:51","date_gmt":"2012-11-07T17:32:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/workplace\/?p=9242"},"modified":"2012-11-07T09:44:45","modified_gmt":"2012-11-07T17:44:45","slug":"four-more-years","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/workplace\/2012\/11\/four-more-years\/","title":{"rendered":"Four More Years"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>\n<div>\n<div>\n<div>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.insidehighered.com\/news\/2012\/11\/07\/what-obama-victory-means-higher-education\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-medium wp-image-9243\" title=\"Obama2012Victory\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/workplace\/files\/2012\/11\/Obama2012Victory-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/workplace\/files\/2012\/11\/Obama2012Victory-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/workplace\/files\/2012\/11\/Obama2012Victory.jpg 640w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: center;\">Four More Years<\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a title=\"View user profile.\" href=\"http:\/\/www.insidehighered.com\/users\/libby-nelson\">Libby A. Nelson<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p>(<em>Inside Higher ed<\/em>, November 7, 2012)\u00a0President Obama, who won re-election Tuesday night, has already hinted how he might deal with higher education in a second term. The question now is how much of that agenda he will be able to accomplish in the next four years, given the budget crises he will face and the expectation that Republicans in Congress will continue to oppose his priorities.<\/p>\n<p>The president\u2019s victory means that colleges can expect the White House to continue to stand up for federal financial aid, as well as for federal research money, in the likely fierce budget battles in the coming months. But the depth of the financial issues the country faces means that federal dollars are likely to be limited, and the president&#8217;s support is more likely to halt deep spending cuts than it is to find new money for higher education programs.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p>It also suggests the continuation of a regulatory agenda that many colleges, especially for-profits, found to be onerous or at least overreaching.<\/p>\n<p>In the near term, a second Obama administration means that the status quo will continue. Education Secretary Arne Duncan has already said he plans to stay for the president\u2019s second term. Although the \u201cgainful employment\u201d regulation, which seeks to rein in for-profit colleges by denying federal aid to those whose students cannot earn enough to pay back their loans, was\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.insidehighered.com\/news\/2012\/07\/03\/gainful-employments-hazy-next-steps\">thrown out in court in July<\/a>, the department has signaled it intends to take another stab at implementing the regulations, which the court supported in principle. The department will also go forward with new federal rules making income-based student loan repayment more generous,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.insidehighered.com\/quicktakes\/2012\/11\/02\/education-dept-releases-rules-disability-discharge-repayment\">published Thursday<\/a>\u00a0but not yet in effect.<\/p>\n<p>In the short term, &#8220;I think it&#8217;s very likely that the Education Department will continue to use its regulatory authority to advance federal education policy,&#8221; said Terry Hartle, senior vice president for government and public affairs at the American Council on Education, after several networks called the race for the president late Tuesday night. Several new regulations are expected in the coming months, including new rules governing teacher preparation programs and a new round of negotiated rule-making dealing with fraud.<\/p>\n<p>But the administration will also confront a fiscal crisis with serious implications for federal financial aid. The \u201c<a href=\"http:\/\/www.insidehighered.com\/news\/2012\/09\/17\/sequester-would-hit-higher-education-programs-hard\">fiscal cliff<\/a>\u201d &#8212; a combination of mandatory spending cuts and expiring tax breaks &#8212; arrives Jan. 2, and Congress must reach a long-term deficit deal to avert across-the-board cuts to defense and domestic discretionary spending. Whether the same lawmakers who were unable to do so a year ago might be more effective now is an open question. (See\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.insidehighered.com\/news\/2012\/11\/07\/higher-ed-and-congressional-election-results\" target=\"_blank\">related article<\/a>\u00a0on the results of the Congressional election.)&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>In other areas, Obama\u2019s victory means current trends are likely to continue. The National Labor Relations Board is considering allowing greater unionization, both for graduate students and at private universities, and may grant it in the president\u2019s second term, when he is able to appoint more members whose views align with his own. The Education Department will also consider its aggressive enforcement of Title IX and civil rights laws.<\/p>\n<p>While the administration is likely to hold the line it has established on for-profit colleges, it\u2019s unlikely that the next four years will see significant new regulations aimed at those colleges. Future regulation, if there is any, is likely to focus on colleges that get money from the GI Bill and other veterans\u2019 benefits.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>Read more:\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.insidehighered.com\/news\/2012\/11\/07\/what-obama-victory-means-higher-education#ixzz2BYhYEz2i \" target=\"_blank\"><em>Inside Higher Ed<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Four More Years Libby A. Nelson (Inside Higher ed, November 7, 2012)\u00a0President Obama, who won re-election Tuesday night, has already hinted how he might deal with higher education in a second term. The question now is how much of that &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/workplace\/2012\/11\/four-more-years\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1527,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[747,621,635,642,2269,2273,2276],"tags":[1288933,1288930,1288964],"class_list":["post-9242","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-academics","category-economics","category-government","category-politics","category-shared-governance","category-students","category-working-conditions","tag-academics","tag-government","tag-working-conditions"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/workplace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9242","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/workplace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/workplace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/workplace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1527"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/workplace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9242"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/workplace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9242\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9247,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/workplace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9242\/revisions\/9247"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/workplace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9242"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/workplace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9242"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/workplace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9242"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}