Monthly Archives: September 2017

Toronto’s Bid for Amazon’s HQ2

(Amazon Inc., 2006)

Amazon is an e-commerce giant, hiring some of the brightest minds to innovate new technology, and they have announced that they are looking for a new North American city to be the home for their HQ2. Unlike many announcements, Amazon highlighted that it is a North American city, and not just an American city, meaning Canada is also being considered and preferred.

Utilizing SWOT analysis, it could be seen that Toronto has many strengths including a talented workforce with the University of Toronto being the best computer science university in Canada and a developed business environment. There are evident weaknesses such as expensive rent and the lack of space for the 100 acres or large building that is demanded. Limiting factors may include how the business is cross border, which may also become an opportunity in the future. Though all of this makes sense and seems like a compelling argument as to why the expansion should be in Toronto and not Detroit or anywhere else, the largest reason that I could see are the government policies that are hindering immigration in the US.

The ‘genius visa’ fuels many of the tech giants, and it is just as important to Amazon. It is likely that Bezos is considering the trend of nationalism in the US and is trying to exit before it becomes a constraint. In many of the articles, it is about the people working, the innovators who will no longer be able to immigrate to the US, but I think it is also about what the geniuses in the US are unable to do. I do not think that as a multinational e-commerce platform, it should be suggested to hire only purebred Americans as their software developers. In order to cater to different populations and promote a positive user experience, it is essential that input from varied sources are heard. There is no easier way than having many immigrants and foreign workers who are more familiar with their countries and customs representing the varied customers. It is profitable for Amazon to have their customers being understood, represented and connected with HQ. When customers are satisfied with the service, feel like they are valued, they become returning customers, essentially the group of people who will make Amazon the most profit.

I believe that the majority of the employees would be dispensable if all their capabilities lies in their skill to perform exactly what is included on their job description. True innovation and creation of a business product requires that the individuals are unique and that the team is high performance. There is no time to deal with the politics of immigration, there is only time for innovation.

Word Count : 446

India’s Boycott of Coca-Cola

(Wikimedia Commons, 2014)

In February 2017, more than a million traders in India started boycotting Coca-Cola (Doshi, 2017).

Coca-Cola has established their plants in rural India in the 1990’s to take advantage of the low cost water sources (“Coca-Cola and Water Use in India: “Good Till the Last Drop””, 2010) and lax environmental policies (Singh, 2015). Despite the heightened shortage of water and pollution from the plants, this has been ongoing for many years.

As a multinational company, Coca-Cola has announced on multiple occasions that they believe that they have a global responsibility. Coca-Cola has also publicly branded themselves as an environmental and sustainable company.

Our commitments are focused where we have the most opportunity to make a difference — water stewardship, sustainable packaging, energy management and climate protection.

– The Coca-Cola Company (“Environmental Initiatives”, 2012)

By allowing the plants in these water scarce regions, Coca-Cola is countering their own words in making a positive difference through water stewardship. Their actions are not socially beneficial, environmentally responsible or economically sustainable. If there is a difference that was made, it could be stated that it was negative, and directly impacts a large amount of local population from daily life to basic agriculture. It is unethical of Coca-Cola to lie to its consumers to gain more supporters, while their supporters are misled by the company.

Furthermore, it should be questioned if the act of establishing plants in India is ethical. Water is a basic human need, and Coca-Cola has indirectly claimed ownership over the already lacking resource and selling it as a commodity. It should be noted, the water that is taken is not only for the amount of water in each Coca-Cola bottle, but also in the production of the bottle itself, and the sugar in each drink.

It has been generally accepted that food and water should be a basic human right, hence all of the food banks, free water in restaurants and special programs in North America. Coca-Cola in this situation, is directly impeding the locals from obtaining water for their crops producing food, and the clean water that is directly consumable.

Despite the many good reasons that may initiate a boycott in sugary bottled drinks, it is not the reason for the Indian traders. The action of boycotting Coca-Cola stemmed from the rise of nationalism in India. The local brands are still being shelved, it is only the foreign brands that are seen as unhealthy and unethical (Sen, 2017).

This is a very unique event as it is the traders who are boycotting Coca-Cola and not the consumers. Therefore it should also be questioned if the traders should take on this role to limit the freedom of the consumers in purchasing the beverage of their choice.

Word Count: 432

References

Coca-Cola and Water Use in India: “Good Till the Last Drop”. (2010). Science Blogs. Retrieved 12 September 2017, from http://scienceblogs.com/primatediaries/2010/03/11/coca-cola-in-india-good-till-t/

Doshi, V. (2017). Indian traders boycott Coca-Cola for ‘straining water resources’The Guardian. Retrieved 12 September 2017, from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/mar/01/indian-traders-boycott-coca-cola-for-straining-water-resources

Environmental Initiatives. (2012). CocaCola Journey. Retrieved 12 September 2017, from http://www.coca-colacompany.com/stories/environmental-initiatives

Sen, S. (2017). Court restores water supply to Pepsi, Coca-Cola in Tamil Nadu, but retailers ban ithindustantimes. Retrieved 12 September 2017, from http://www.hindustantimes.com/business-news/ban-of-pepsi-coca-cola-in-tamil-nadu-and-the-rise-of-indian-nationalism/story-oWUjtvUiBc5u4dDg34GCYJ.html

Singh, D. (2015). Coca Cola plant spewing toxic waste near Delhi, green watchdog claims sewerage is leaking into pond near agriculture fieldsDaily Mail. Retrieved 12 September 2017, from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/indiahome/indianews/article-3334017/Coca-Cola-plant-spewing-toxic-waste-near-Delhi-Pollution-report-Centre-s-green-watchdog-claims-sewage-leaking-pond-near-agricultural-fields.html

Wikimedia Commons. (2014). CocaColaIndia.png. Retrieved from https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/15/CocaColaIndia.png