Issues of New Directions for Teaching and Learning relevant to the project:

Volume 2001, Issue 88
Special Issue: [Fresh Approaches to the Evaluation of Teaching](http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jissue/89011422) . Issue Edited by Christopher Knapper, Patricia Cranton

[Volume 2000, Issue 83](http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jissue/101523973)

[Recognising and Rewarding Good Teaching in Australian Higher Education](http://www.autc.gov.au/pubs/caut/rrgt/default.htm)

A 1995 report by Paul Ramdsen and collaborators for the Autralian government

Saroyan, A. & Snell, L.S. (1997).[Variations in Lecuturing Styles.](http://www.springerlink.com/openurl.asp?genre=article&id=doi:10.1023/A:1002992423519) Higher Education, 33(1): 85-104.

While I’ve been reading some of the recent literature, I’ve been [mapping the questions](http://careo.elearning.ubc.ca/weblogs/peerreview/archives/Questions About Peer Review Models.pdf”) that I would ask someone about their peer review program.

American Association for Higher Education [clearinghouse site on the Peer Review of Teching](http://web.archive.org/web/20041021030648/www.aahe.org/teaching/Peer_Review.htm) from the mid 1990s.

Pat Hutchings [article on an Institute of Peer Review of Teaching held at Stanford University](http://web.archive.org/web/20041021030648/http://www.aahe.org/teaching/nov94bull…May_18.htm) in 1994.

Beaty, L. (1998). [The Professional Development of Teachers in Higher Education: Structures, Methods and Responsibilities.](http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&an=6852295), Innovations in Education & Training International (Vol. 35, pp. 99): Routledge, Ltd.

**NEW** Bernstein, D.J., Jonson, J. & Smith, K. (2000). [An Examination of the Implementation of Peer Review of Teaching](http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/101523985/PDFSTART). New directions for teaching and learning. 83: 73-86.

Centra, J. (1975). [Colleagues as raters of classroom instruction.](http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022-1546%28197505%2F06%2946%3A3%3C327%3ACAROCI%3E2.0.CO%3B2-E) Journal of Higher Education, 46(3), 327-337.

Cohen, P. a. M., W. (1980). The Role of Colleagues in the Evaluation of College Teaching. Improving College and University Teaching, 28( 4), 147-154.

Cosh, J. (1998). [Peer Observation in Higher Education – A Reflective Approach.](http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&an=6852315), Innovations in Education & Training International (Vol. 35, pp. 171): Routledge, Ltd.

**NEW** Cosser, M. (1998). [Towards the design of a system of peer review of teaching for the advancement of the individual within the university.](http://www.springerlink.com/openurl.asp?genre=article&id=doi:10.1023/A:1003155703281) Higher Education, 35(2): 143-162.

Elton, L. (1998). [Dimensions of excellence in university teaching.](http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&an=6830906) International Journal for Academic Development, 3(1), 3.

Fleming, S., Shire, J., Jones, D., McNamee, M., Pill, A., & Mcnamee, M. (2004). [Continuing professional development: suggestions for effective practice](http://journalsonline.tandf.co.uk/openurl.asp?genre=article&id=doi:10.1080/0309877042000206732). Journal of Further and Higher Education, 28(2), 165-177.

Hamilton, N. W. (2003). [The Ethics of Peer Review.](http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&an=EJ666392) Liberal Education, 89(1), 42-49.

Hammersley-Fletcher, L., & Orsmond, P. (2005). [Reflecting on reflective practices within peer observation](http://journalsonline.tandf.co.uk/openurl.asp?genre=article&id=doi:10.1080/03075070500043358
)
. Studies in Higher Education, 30(2), 213-224.

Hammersley-Fletcher, L., & Orsmond, P. (2004). [Evaluating our peers: is peer observation a meaningful process?](http://journalsonline.tandf.co.uk/openurl.asp?genre=article&id=doi:10.1080/0307507042000236380) Studies in Higher Education, 29(4), 489-503.

Hendry, G. D., & Dean, S. J. (2002). [Accountability, evaluation of teaching and expertise in higher education.](http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&an=9070431), International Journal for Academic Development (Vol. 7, pp. 75-82): Routledge, Ltd.

Irby, D. (1983). Peer Review of Teaching in Medicine. Journal of Medical Education, 58, 457-461.(Stacks)

Keig, L., & Waggoner, M. D. (1994). [Collaborative Peer Review: The Role of Faculty in Improving College Teaching.](http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&an=ED378925) ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 2.

Keig, L. W., & Waggoner, M. D. (1995). Peer Review of Teaching: Improving College Instruction Through Formative Assessment. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 6(3), 51-83.

Kelly, J. (2005). [Development and Implementation of an External Peer-Review Process.](http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&an=16640035), Journal of Healthcare Management (Vol. 50, pp. 137-142): American College of Healthcare Executives.

MacAlpine, M. (2001). [An Attempt to Evaluate Teaching Quality: one department’s story.](http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&an=5531089), Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (Vol. 26, pp. 563-578): Carfax Publishing Company.

MacKinnon, M. M. (2001). [Using observational feedback to promote academic development](http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&an=5180551)., International Journal for Academic Development (Vol. 6, pp. 21-28): Routledge, Ltd.

Martin, G. A., & Double, J. M. (1998). [Developing Higher Education Teaching Skills Through Peer Observation and Collaborative Reflection.](http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&an=6852312), Innovations in Education & Training International (Vol. 35, pp. 161): Routledge, Ltd.

Mignon, C., & Langsam, D. (1999). [Peer Review and Post-tenure Review.](http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&an=11714854), Innovative Higher Education (Vol. 24, pp. 49-59): Kluwer Academic Publishing.

Morehead, J. W., & Shedd, P. J. (1997). [Utilizing Summative Evaluation Through External Peer Review of Teaching.](http://www.springerlink.com/openurl.asp?genre=article&id=doi:10.1023/A:1025199425293) Innovative Higher Education, 22(1), 37-44.

**NEW** Paulsen, M.B. (2002). [Evaluating teaching performance.](http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/98518693/PDFSTART) New directions for institutional research, 2002(114): 5-18.

Pratt, D. D. (1997). [Reconceptualizing the evaluation of teaching in higher education.](http://www.springerlink.com/openurl.asp?genre=article&id=doi:10.1023/A:1003046127941) Higher Education, 34(1), 23-44.

Quinlan, K. M. (2002). [Inside the peer review process: how academics review a colleague’s teaching portfolio.](http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6VD8-473TYWF-9/2/01e27f3da47059ff020b1ba4b884bf00) Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 1035-1049.

Quinlan, K. M., &

UBC, [TAG Guidelines for Peer Review](http://www.tag.ubc.ca/resources/evaluation/guidelines.php)
Tufts University Center for Academic Excellence. [Peer Review of Teaching](http://ase.tufts.edu/cae/occasional_papers/peer.htm)
AAHE [Peer Review of Teaching Handbook](http://www.aahe.org/teaching/workbook…May_18.htm)

Kreig, L. and Waggoner, M.D. (1994). [Collaborative Peer Review: The Role of Faculty in Improving College Teaching](http://www.ntlf.com/html/lib/bib/94-2dig.htm). ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report no. 2.

Beaty, L. (1998). [The Professional Development of Teachers in Higher Education: Structures, Methods and Responsibilities.](http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&an=6852295), Innovations in Education & Training International (Vol. 35, pp. 99): Routledge, Ltd.

Cosh, J. (1998). [Peer Observation in Higher Education – A Reflective Approach.](http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&an=6852315), Innovations in Education & Training International (Vol. 35, pp. 171): Routledge, Ltd.