In order to answer the question of “Are there equal opportunities on campus to get involved?”, my group analyzed the UBC Peer Programs to determine whether it is accessible to those who are disabled. A key concept when discussing accessibility is Universal Design, which is a design outline that attempts to make things accessible to as many people and as many situations as possible. One component of our analysis was to determine whether the concept of Universal Design was applied in order to make the site more accessible, especially for those with disabilities.
Since none of us in the group were disabled, it was challenging for us to “take the role of the other” and view the page through the lens of someone living with a disability. At first, this added some difficulty to our analysis of the Peer Programs webpage, since we assumed everything looked easy enough to read and access. However, after actively analyzing the page with the criteria for accessibility given to us by Universal Design, the criteria gave us direction in what to look out for in terms of format and layout of the website, and how to shift our thinking to determine in what ways the webpage was easy to access for those who live with some form of disability. We found that the page was easy to read due to there being enough contrast between the darker colour of the text and the lighter-coloured background of the webpage, therefore fulfilling the UD principle of “simple, intuitive use”. We also found that the page was easy to navigate due to a simple design. In addition, we found that the page has a Readability score of 9.9, making it fairly easy to understand for those at a college level, and when compared to the Readability scores of other groups, the lowest score of all assigned webpages for this assignment.
Despite some aspects of the page contributing to its accessibility, our group still came across some accessibility problems. For example, there is no obvious way to increase text size for those who have a visual impairment. To do that, I discovered that one must scroll to the very bottom of the page and click the small link entitled “Accessibility” in order to view ways the text size can be changed so it can be read more easily. When compared to a website like Cbc.ca, where the “Accessibility” are clearly outlined in a distinctly visible area on the side of the page, it is obvious that UBC could do more to make the page more accessible to those with visual impairments. In terms of page content, the “Peer Programs” UBC offers may not be accessible to all who wish to join those programs, due to the nature of some job duties requiring an amount of physical effort that would not cause too many problems for an able-bodied person, but not so much for someone with a physical disability. Also, it was noted by one member of the group that most of the “support” programs offered by UBC on this page mainly cater to those with mental disabilities rather than those with physical disabilities.
When taking into consideration the research my group and I did, I believe that opportunities to get involved are not equal. Equal opportunities to get involved stem from how equally accessible the information about these programs is. If measures are taken to improve the accessibility of this page for those who are disabled, then opportunities will become more equal.