More places you can learn about bias and allyship!
A non-profit organization & international, collaborative network of researchers investigating implicit social cognition, or thoughts & feelings that are largely outside of conscious awareness and control.
A research partnership with the shared goal to foster women’s inclusion and success in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math). We bring together social scientists, STEM experts, & stakeholders in STEM industry and education.
Learn more about the mathematical model that inspired the allyship simulator.
References
Campbell, M. R., & Brauer, M. (2021). Is discrimination widespread? Testing assumptions about bias on a university campus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(4), 756–777. doi:10.1037/xge0000983
Czopp, A. M., & Monteith, M. J. (2003). Confronting prejudice (literally): Reactions to confrontations of racial and gender bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(4), 532–544. doi:10.1177/0146167202250923
De Souza, L., & Schmader, T. (2022). The misjudgment of men: Does pluralistic ignorance inhibit allyship?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(2), 265–285. doi.10.1037/pspi0000362
De Souza, L, & Schmader, T. (2023). When people do allyship: A taxonomy of allyship action. Manuscript invited for revision at Personality and Social Psychology Review.
Gaucher, D., Friesen, J., & Kay, A. C. (2011). Evidence that gendered wording in job advertisements exists and sustains gender inequality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 109–128. doi:10.1037/a0022530
Kaiser, C. R., & Miller, C. T. (2001). Stop complaining! The social costs of making attributions to discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(2), 254–263. doi:10.1177/0146167201272010
Kaiser, C. R., & Miller, C. T. (2003). Derogating the victim: The interpersonal consequences of blaming events on discrimination. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6(3), 227–237. doi:10.1177/13684302030063001
Rasinski, H. M., & Czopp, A. M. (2010). The effect of target status on witnesses’ reactions to confrontations of bias. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 32(1), 8–16. doi:10.1080/01973530903539754
Watson, S., Appiah, O., & Thornton, C. G. (2011). The effect of name on pre‐interview impressions and occupational stereotypes: the case of black sales job applicants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(10), 2405-2420.
Wennerås, C. & Wold, A. (1997). Nepotism and sexism in peer-review. Nature, 387, 341-343.
All Icons from Iconfinder adapted & used with Creative Commons
(Attribution-Share Alike 3.0)
Credits
Developed by: Penjani Chavula, Toni Schmader, Audrey Aday, Rebekah Parker & Hana Geara
With help from: Tara C. Dennehy, Lucy De Souza, Jena Arianto, Victoria Lee, Clarinne Tham, Daphne Tian, & Aadhya Mittal
2022
Follow