What Denny’s Can Teach About Branding

I love Denny’s. A hearty bacon and egg breakfast is one of my all-time favourite meals. A Grand Slamwich tastes phenomenal – especially if after a night of drinking. (I’m glad Denny’s is opening up to the fact that being open 24/7 means that many of their late night patrons may be intoxicated). Screen Shot 2015-04-01 at 9.29.11 PM

With that being said, some of the reasoning behind some of their recent communications campaigns makes perfect sense: when I go to Denny’s, I generally pick between the same two menu items, every single time. Grand Slam or Grand Slamwich. Grand Slam or Grandslamwich. I don’t always browse the menu.

I had seen a couple of the Always Open videos before and I love the concept behind them. Similar in concept to Comedians In Cars Getting Coffee with Jerry Seinfeld, producing viral videos such as these are quite an effective way to connect with the younger audiences and reinforce the Denny’s brand in a subtle way. People love the comedians and actors that are being featured in Always Open, so it wouldn’t be surprising to one day wake up and see a video branded with Denny’s on the front page of Reddit or being shared on my Facebook newsfeed.

Here are a few key takeaways from Jeff Beer’s article about Denny’s content marketing:

  1. A brand is a feeling, first and foremost – If people aren’t feeling connected to the brand, much of the content you create or communications you release can be meaningless. Understanding how you play a role in the lives of your customers and, thus, how they genuinely feel about you can help dictate the way you communicate with them.
  2. Social media is used to remind people you’re there, and it needs to be transparent and true. – The worst kind of social media is the type that simply spits out and broadcasts press releases and promotions on the daily. Sure, people love promotions. But promotions won’t explicitly help customers connect with the brand itself. If a brand can release relevant and interesting content, be up to date with pop culture and world events, and actually have a personality, they are generally far more likely to connect with audiences and reach mass appeal. Using Denny’s as an example again: most people probably don’t set up their Twitter accounts with the intentions of following the American chain – but when they release content such as the iPhone mock or responses to major news items, people notice, it gets shared, and their following increases. All of a sudden, Denny’s has an online personality behind it, the brand name is infused in people’s daily digestion of their online social media feeds, and people follow along. Social media can be very powerful when interactive, honest, and full of personality and charm (even if it’s quirky – as long as it’s true and honest). Some more examples of strong brand Tweets can be found here.
  3. “Read, react, and refine.” Test and monitor very closely. – It’s okay to experiment and take calculated risks with your brand. That was a key takeaway from Beer’s article. What’s important, though, is that these risks are monitored very closely. If something doesn’t seem to be working, the brand needs to react and refine their approach. There’s no sense carrying on with a campaign or a message that doesn’t resonate with an audience. With digital and internet communications being able to be updated almost instantaneously these days, and content scheduled or released hour by hour, a brand cannot wait for month-end reports to roll in before evaluating if a message or approach is resonating. Those working behind a brand need to constantly have their finger on the button and their eyes on the dialogue surrounding what they’ve released. The good news about the internet: feedback can be almost instantaneous.

 

Building Beloved Brands

Lever 2000 has been around for years. It’s also backed by one of the biggest CPG companies in the world, Unilever. It makes you wonder, then – why does the brand suck so much? How often do you encounter people who have an emotional attachment to Lever 2000? You probably don’t.

What stuck out to me first in Graham Roberton’s slide deck on Building Beloved Brands was his breakdown of focus and strategic choices dependent on a brand’s position on his “Brand Love Curve” (slides 15 & 16). I feel as if early level marketing conversations, especially in university, tend to centre on how you drive out more people to buy your product (or as Robertson labels it, “The Feet”). More customers is obviously important for any brand, but it was interesting to see Robertson visually placing “The Mind” first. It’s tough to really drive out large quantities of shoppers if they don’t think about your brand, if they can’t differentiate who you are, and if they don’t recall your brand. Thus, if you’re a brand which consumers are, by and large, indifferent to, then you need to focus on tapping into “The Mind” and “get consumers to think differently about [the] brand.” In order to do this, a company could do something such as launching something new to gain attention or driving a new position in order to shift consumer thought about the brand.

A few other key points stood out to me from his slide set:

“Build a big idea you can shout from a mountain.” (slide 35)

Why does the idea have to be big? Is Coca-Cola a big idea? Sure, it’s a major brand – but I don’t necessarily see the correlation behind a “big idea” and making a brand beloved. People love Dove Soap, but Dove Soap is not necessarily a big idea. They communicate their brand idea exceptionally well, this is why consumers have connected with them so well. With that being said, crafting a feel good campaign that touches on inner beauty and personal strength isn’t necessarily a “big idea” – but it’s an emotional one that people can relate to.

“Execute with passion. If you don’t love your work, how do you expect your consumer to love the brand?” (slide 44)

I think this is an idea that is becoming increasingly noticed amongst employers, companies, and brands each day. It is exceptionally difficult to communicate a brand passionately and honestly, in a way that consumers would be able to feel, if the brand is managed and pushed out by cold corporate environment where everyone is working for the next dollar, not necessarily because they love the brand. There are, of course, likely exceptions to this rule. However, it’s very important that the philosophies and ideals behind a brand are communicated, exemplified, and valued between the employees managing a brand and the company that employs them. For Dove Soap employees to genuinely craft brand messages related to strength and inner beauty, that must also be a philosophy that is widely recognized within the company as well. This will connect the employees to the brand who will in turn want to connect others with it as well a la WestJet where “everyone is an owner.”

“People don’t really want a quarter-inch drill. They just want a quarter-inch hole.” (slide 36)

This is exceptionally important to remember when managing a company, developing products, and generating a brand image. People aren’t typically buying products simply because they love an inanimate object. They’re buying a product because it suits their needs. People buy drills because they need to drill a hole. People buy toothpaste because they want their teeth to be clean and healthy. Although you can add many layers of personality and connection to a brand, you should never lose sight of the core issue that your product solves for the consumer.

 

 

 

Designated Drivers

Assignment: “Write a paragraph about the concept of a designated driver…”

 

Source: http://www.plug.london/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Designated-driver.jpg

It’s 2am on a Saturday and, as per usual in Vancouver, the rain is pelting the pavement outside. It’s December and the air is damp and cold. Everyone’s breath reeks of shitty mixed drinks and tequila as we stumble out onto the sidewalk after closing time. The plan was to bus home, but the bus stop is at least a ten minute walk, the rain is coming down without mercy for all the hipster-chic Vancouverites who are out on this block, and there hasn’t been an empty taxicab pass by in what feels like years. Impatiently, our friend whips out his keys and, instead of leaving the car until morning as planned, we pile in and drive away, recklessly endangering those around us because a few drunk people didn’t want to get wet. A designated driver would change all of this – as a designated driver is a pre-selected individual out of the group who stays sober for the evening in order to transport others safely. It’s a good idea, it’s cheaper than cabbing, and it’s more comfortable than bussing. Typically, a designated driver is a win-win (except, perhaps, for the one friend who has to remain sober while those around them descend into drunken stupidity). I’ve had a number of friends offer to take on this role, especially if they wanted to socialize but save money. Other nights, a designated driver is difficult to find.

Now Read: http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/chc/harvard-alcohol-project/

From http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/chc/harvard-alcohol-project/

Harvard’s School of Public Health sought to inject the concept of the designated driver and an aura of acceptability surrounding being the “sober one” into American culture. They did this through partnering with all major television broadcast networks to air PSAs but, more importantly, to work story-lines and references connected to designated drivers and sober drivers into popular television programs. I personally believe this was an extremely intelligent manoeuvre. At its peak during its original run, Cheers was watched by over 27 million viewers nightly. If viewers could see an avid drinker such as Norm, a relatable character who everyone knew by name at the local bar because of his frequent visits (“Norm!”) discuss being driven home by a designated driver, the concept would likely gain more acceptance at a faster rate than it would through an onslaught of overly dramatic (often times poorly produced) public service announcements and advertisements. If Norm is going out after working, having a number of drinks amongst friends, and then calling a sober friend for a ride home, then perhaps others should do the same and it wouldn’t be socially unacceptable.

This isn’t the only time either partnerships have been made (or pressure has been placed) on media and production companies. The mass reduction of cigarettes from Hollywood films has damaged the connection between glamour and cigarettes. Although it’s not completely eradicated, it’s much less common to see a lead Hollywood actor light up in an blockbuster action film, less on-screen couples are lighting up for a post-sex drag, and you would definitely not see Cruella Deville drawn with a cigarette in any remake of 101 Dalmatians. Similar tactics could be applied to a topic such as condom use. Rates of condom use in America has increased, but if public health organizations wanted to see a further increased use of condoms to reduce transmission of disease or, perhaps, teenage pregnancy, they could work with broadcasters or film production companies to increase the mention or discussion of condoms and condom use in television shows and Hollywood films. Having two characters discuss the need to use a condom during a conversation in the show Glee, for example, might leave an impression on the many teenagers who watch the show religiously. Having a character in a raucous sex comedy noting the need to put on a condom before a wild romp could infer subliminally to the audience that wearing a condom is okay, even in those more “random hookups.” If public health organizations wanted to take it to the extreme, they could attempt to partner up with adult entertainment production companies to increase the visible use of condoms in adult features – and, thus, injecting the sight of a condom into the fantasies of audiences, spanning genders and sexualities.

Moral of the story: subliminal-esque messages (“designated drivers”) and product placements (condoms) within television and films can work for the greater good and can be very effective if done right.

Briefly talking about briefs.

For this entry, we had to give Bassett & Partner’s video Briefly a watch.

There were four quotes that stuck out to me through watching this short film. They range from simple explanations of what a creative brief truly is, to the levels of understanding that you need to have in order to be successful with the brief and with the ensuing project.

1. “A brief is nothing more than an open statement of ambition for a brand.” 

-John Boiler

This was the first introduction, just minutes into the video, explaining a broader idea behind all of the presenters’ views on creative briefs: they shouldn’t just be an explanation of an intention behind a campaign. Similarly, it’s not just to create a series of advertisements. Rather, it’s an overarching, ambitious statement on what a brand should be, could be, would be, can be.

2. “The best briefs I’ve ever worked on have always been the most audacious and seemingly impossible.” 

-John Boiler

This ties in with the last quote from Boiler, but it again reinforces the idea that a creative brief doesn’t have to lay out a clear-cut problem that can be addressed with a clear-cut solution. The brief should be an accurate depiction of a brand or a company or a problem, but it doesn’t have to be overly grounded, the problem doesn’t have to be downplayed, and it doesn’t have to be a small problem. Sometimes, the more audacious or seemingly impossible the material is that is contained within the brief, the bigger spark it can give to the creative team.

3. “Those ideas would not have come about without a brief that had limitations and an invitation.” 

-David Rockwell (~15:30)

I feel as if this quote from Rockwell again builds on Boiler’s point in the last selected quote, but also keeps it a bit in check with reality: briefs should be ambitious, challenging, and audacious, but it can (and probably should, in some scenarios) have limitations. This quote arises with Rockwell’s explanation of how his team tackled The Cosmopolitan account in Las Vegas. This was a hotel that was already partially built, so the creativity had to be developed around the pre-existing limitations. Ambition and boldness is important in the briefing process, but so is reality. It is with the recognition of the real limitations behind The Cosmopolitan that Rockwell’s team was able to suggest its innovative ideas surrounding the technological, “changing” entrance of pillars, and blowing open the first three floors in the building to change visual perceptions within the hotel. The limitations presented an exciting void in the project that could be filled with creativity.

4. “We have this habit today of thinking information is knowledge…it’s not. Just because you can Google it, doesn’t mean you have context for anything.” 

-John C. Jay (16:14)

This quote really stuck out to me and has left me pondering just how well I do what John C. Jay says is important: keeping up with culture. This cultural know-how is not limited to simply keeping up to date with headlines, but rather understanding, following, and researching culture. During the creative process, you should be able to connect culture to the project, not only to enhance it but to add context. The context is important, and this is not something that can simply be learned by Googling a topic but rather by immersing oneself.

I feel as if, when you first learn about a business process of any type, it seems quite structured, rigid, and previously defined. A business report is a business report. A memo is a memo. A creative brief is a creative brief. It’s not until you listen to truly experienced individuals speak about their experiences with drafting and working with briefs that you can understand the world of opportunity that is available. Although every project must begin with a brief, as the video states, the way in which a brief can and should be approached can vary greatly. The creative process behind developing a brief can be almost, if not equally, as important as the creative process that will follow it. Creative briefs can be ambitious. They can also work well when injected with some limitations, as certain limitations can add an interesting creative problem to the project. At the end of the day, the creative brief must give a creative team a very accurate depiction of a brand, or company, or project, with the right information, as well as the right amount of freedom or ambition or audacity in order to keep the creative team interested – or else the creative team might just reject it. And that’s okay – because the last thing you want is a creative team uninterested in the project they’re doing for you.

“If the brief isn’t true, stop working on it…stop.”

-John C. Jay

Snapcash

Mobile money transfers just got a whole lot easier thanks to a company most probably wouldn’t have suspected. Snapchat, the mobile app famous for its timed viewing of photos (and its association with lewd photos) recently launched Snapcash. Snapcash is a partnership with mobile payment tech company Square that enables Snapchat users to send cash by simply typing a monetary amount in a Snapchat chat window and pressing send. Banking information is stored within the app and the recipient receives the money as quickly as they received your last selfie.

Snapchat has entered into the mobile payment realm. Photo source: E! Online

This is a pretty big step forward for instant money transfers in North America. We, of course, have Google Wallet and Apple Pay which helps businesses collect more easily from consumers, but Snapcash is definitely geared towards transfers and payments between consumers. Owe someone $5? Snapcash it to them. $20 for the movie last night? Snapcash it. With a monthly limit of $1000, there is a lot of room for small payments for the ordinary user.

So what does this mean for marketers? As of right now, not a whole lot. It’s simply a cool feature in a very popular mobile app. However, I’d highly doubt it will remain this way for long. Payment transfer through the app simply screams app monetization. Techcrunch agreed: For example, the app could one day send you a Snap or show a Story ad from a merchant, and let you buy the product shown instantly through Snapchat.” Collecting banking and credit card information, and having the ability to transfer funds, opens the door to possible advertising revenue — an area that many mobile apps and social networks have continued to struggle to exploit. 

Personally, I’d struggle with the issue of trusting Snapchat with my banking information. Snapchat is a fast photo-sharing app – it has never required secure information before. Of course, we all trusted Snapchat with our photos with the notion that the photos are ‘deleted’ as soon as they’re viewed. We learned that this was untrue, and the developers never even made the app this way. Just earlier this year, Snapchat suffered a large data breach over the information of four million of its users. Very little has been said about just how secure the money transfer software is. It is supplied by Square, which has proven secure, but it’s offered over the Snapchat platform. Some people are skeptical of its security, and a data breach with banking information could be bad news for the company if it was ever to occur.

Sound Off: Are you going to use Snapcash? Do you think it’s secure? How can Snapcash be used for marketing? 

YouTube Preview Image

The dangerous world of the Internet for politicians

It’s always good to branch out in an effort to reach more people – especially in politics. That said, the Internet can be a challenging place for people who want to run for public office. It’s political suicide to not have an online presence these days (website, Twitter, Facebook, etc.), but it’s even worse to be online and to screw it up. As we hear time and again, what goes on the Internet stays on the Internet and it can spread quickly.

Thus, it’s vitally important that, just like for companies, politicians and political parties have proper online communication and marketing plans and personnel which are flexible and open to emerging trends, but also appropriately reactive in times of trouble.

Reddit, AMA’s, and Politicians

A growing popularity amongst political figures is to get onto Reddit and conduct an “Ask Me Anything” (AMA) session. As an almost unrestricted free open forum, these AMA’s are an opportunity for all anonymous Reddit users to throw whatever questions they want to the person hosting the session and wait for the responses to come in. Celebrities, authors, interesting personalities, and the likes do these everyday. Within the past couple years, politicians have been hopping on board the train – and it hasn’t always gone so well.

An initiative such as a Reddit AMA can gain a significant amount of online exposure, but it is essentially releasing any control an individual or organization has over the direction of a conversation. Some politicians, such as President Barack Obama, have been relatively successful by employing methods such as very short time limits of a half hour to answer questions. People don’t expect much in a half hour.

A “Train Wreck”

The same can’t be said for Matt McCall who was challenging an incumbent in a Republican primary. His AMA became Reddit-famous because it became a massive failure. People instantly began bombarding McCall with questions that he appeared unprepared to answer, such as: “In a previous comment, you said you wanted to keep the government “out of our bedrooms.” Yet immediately following that statement, within the same comment you said marriage is between a man and a woman. Would you like to take a moment to explain this comment and defend your position?” and “If you believe in shutting down the EPA, what do you propose to do about the growing environmental problems in the United States such as the pollution of major waterways such as the Mississippi river through fertilizer and manure runoff from farms, the poisoning of groundwater from factory runoff and fracking, and the regulation of emissions by cars on the road, or do you believe these are not legitimate concerns?”

These questions went unanswered. Attempts were made to delete the thread. Then McCall’s account. Then people on Facebook claimed the questions were “unfair.” Other Reddit users summarized the event in this way:

Screen Shot 2014-11-18 at 8.24.16 PM

Martin O’ Malley, another American politician rumoured to be considering running for President, had his AMA covered by The Washington Post. The reason? He only answered a couple dozen questions and his responses were described as lacklustre.

Kathleen Wynne, the Premier of Ontario, attempted an AMA during the last election campaign. Hers was covered by the CBC. Again, she evidently ignored a number of difficult questions and responses with limp answers. One Redditor commented: “This was the worst AMA I’ve ever seen. She responded to the easiest questions possible and ignored almost everything of substance — even her answers to any sort of controversial questions were non-statements.” At the end of the day, she still won her election.

In the Vancouver mayoral election, the three frontrunner candidates also took part in their own AMA’s. None were as disastrous as Matt McCall’s, but even Kirk LaPointe’s had a number of criticisms for not answering popular questions and answering many with simply stating that he’d “study the matter.”

The Point

Kirk LaPointe conducting a Reddit AMA. Source: Huffington Post

The point is this: the Internet is a phenomenal tool to connect with populations the world over. Branding yourself properly and utilizing the Internet positively can make an individual appear in a very good light. However, some Internet communications streams can also be risky, and Reddit AMA’s for politicians are a prime example of this. They are unregulated and highly popular: the politician and his/her team either needs to be very prepared and open, or they need to avoid them altogether. Modern political campaign marketing plans might want to take these sorts of online forums into account.

For a compilation of the best political AMA’s, go here: http://www.topiama.com/cat/politics. 

 

Get social, make profit.

Econsultancy recently covered an announcement by Dutch airline KLM that they generate 25 million euros per year off of their social media activity. This is a very significant amount of money to be made off of social media efforts. Although social media is very clearly an extraordinarily popular means of communicating with clients and potential customers, experts and the like are still measuring how exactly to determine ROI off of social media and social media marketing companies are still struggling to actually make money.

Still, a quick perusal of KLM’s social media and it’s not overly surprising that they’re finding ways to make money off of it. Take Twitter for example: browse their tweets and you’ll see numerous promotions, videos, and photos for people to interact with. Browse through their tweets and replies and you’ll see a plethora of responses. The company is consistently responding to people who inquire, even negatively, and in 11 languages.

Even more impressive, their Twitter profile cover photo is updated every 5 minutes and features the estimated response time. It’s like being at the DMV, except it doesn’t suck and they can only respond in 140 character or less.

KLM updates their Twitter photo every 5 minutes to update followers. Source: Econsultancy.

The company states that it learned how to effectively use its social media during times of trouble:

“Recounting the story of KLM’s social origins, Vogel-Meijer said that in 2010 the company learned a lesson by responding quickly when flights over Europe were banned due to the Icelandic ash cloud.
Previously the company had only been using social to push out standard marketing messages, however thousands of questions began pouring in on Facebook and Twitter as all other service channels were busy.
Faced with the dilemma of either responding to the queries or ignoring them all, KLM opted for the former.
It did so without waiting to form a proper strategy, but responded to the situation as it developed.
That was the start KLM’s social strategy and remains the basis of its success.”

 

Put simply, KLM sees success in its social media because it follows some of the most basic principles of social media that many companies consistently fail to follow:

  • It doesn’t just advertise. Amongst advertisements are valuable promotions and cool content previously curated.
  • They respond and engage. If you tweet KLM, they will tweet you back. Plus, they adapt to the person speaking to them and they sound human.
  • They monitor their social channels. They soon began to find that many of their customers and social followers wanted forms of “social payments.” Now, you can pay online over Facebook and Twitter. And they claim to be making 80,000 euros a week doing it.

I guess it goes to show that if you properly engage your audience and make your company accessible and human online, profits can follow – especially if customers specifically ask to be able to pay over your social media channels, like KLM customers did.

The rise of freemium?

Just recently, YouTube announced the upcoming release of it’s new paid streaming music service Music Key. Although some of the more specific technical details of the service have yet to be announced, the website promises three key things: (1) ad-free music, (2) background listening, and (3) offline playback. Reportedly, this service will be valued at $10 a month for subscribers. Mashable took a stab at explaining the rationale behind the new service.

This is actually a pretty big deal. Not because this hasn’t been done before. A quick look at a little old app called Spotify would disprove that notion. However, it’s no secret that YouTube is one of the most visited websites in the world, averaging 1 billion visitors a month. On top of that, the site is owned by Internet giant Google. The launch of Music Key indicates an experiment with freemium subscriptions on one of the most widely used platforms on the Internet – and one that is very much known for being 100% free.

Freemium is a pricing strategy by which a product or service (typically a digital offering such as software, media, games or web services) is provided free of charge, but money (premium) is charged for proprietary features, functionality, or virtual goods.

Freemium appears to be popping up everywhere these days. From in-app purchases, such as in Clash of Clans that leads to media-reported £7,000 phone bills, to social networks such as LinkedIn that charge more for in-depth services and features, Internet companies, app developers, and the likes look to be diversifying the ways in which they generate revenue online. Gone are the days where ads paid the bills and generate revenue for artists. Now, there’s the possibility of raising money from those Internet browsers who need that extra bit of service hidden behind the paywall.

But does Freemium guarantee success? I would say no. Consumers are used to getting things for free on the Internet (unless they’re online shopping). There needs to be a considerable amount of incentive to pay a subscription fee, when it is so easy to access free information and/or content with just a few more clicks. A post on Forbes would agree stating that, for freemium, you need: the right market, with a gap in said market; a compelling reason to upgrade; and proper metrics to measure success.

So will YouTube Music Key be successful? It remains to be seen. YouTube is a massive Internet entity – so the success of its paid option will be watched by many. Success in the freemium market for such a popular, formerly 100% free website could cause significant changes to the Internet landscape.

Sound Off: Do you think freemium services are here to stay? Do you think YouTube’s new streaming music venture will be successful? 

It might be okay to be chatty on the internet now.

Source: http://performancing.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Freelance-Writing-Jobs-For-Beginners.jpg

I’ve never been one for levity when it comes to my writing. This has always been an issue. Day to day, I don’t necessarily talk a lot, but when I write I want to be thorough. I want the piece of writing to be properly structured, properly introduced, the subject matter explored from multiple angles, perhaps some opinion or commentary fused in, followed by a conclusion. Of course, this changes depending on what I’m writing: I’ve taught myself how to get to the point in a press release. I’ve taught myself not to drone on in an e-mail. But I’ve always hated the fact that it’s consistently drilled into people that the most successful blog posts and internet writing are short, 300-500 word posts.

That might not be the case anymore. 

Marketing Pilgrim recently summarized a report released by Searchmetrics, an SEO and research firm. In this, they found a few interesting conclusions that could be very important for online writers and marketers:

   Content:High quality, relevant content ranks better on average, and is identifiable by properties such as comprehensive wording in regard to the co-occurrence of related terms in the context, a higher word-count and media enrichment

•    Technology: A well optimized technical performance of a page contributes to a good ranking, such as, robust site architecture with an optimal internal linking structure, short loading times and presence of meta tags. 
•    Backlinks: The quantity and quality of backlinks remains crucial as there are many new features introduced this year that have been revised to improve the quality of the results. 
•     Social Signals: The correlation values regarding coefficients out of the social sector have slightly decreased. The growth of the average total number of signals per position was rather small. 
•     User Signals: For the first time, user signals were measured and as expected there is a relation between rankings and higher click-through rates, lower bounce rates and a high time-on-site. (Credit: Searchmetrics)

Average Ranking vs. Length of Text Post Source: Searchmetrics Report

 

Most important to note in this situation is the idea that a higher word count could leader to better search rankings. This, of course, is still very much interdependent on strong content. Writing pages of nonsense will serve no purpose – but it appears that people on the Internet are open to reading more in 2014 than they were just one year ago. Perhaps this indicates why site like Medium have caught on.  

Very important to note is that, although readers are open to reading more, the ease of reading must also be considerably high. The top sites on Google, as determined by Searchmetrics through using the classic Flesch-value scale, are those sites that could easily be read by a 13 to 15 year old.

Additionally, key words are of utmost importance. In terms of Google rankings, all of your text means nothing if your key words are not directly related. Google will not rank highly those pages that use random keywords in an attempt to pick up more readers.

So, if this information proves correct, more long-winded writers like myself have reasons to rejoice: as long as we keep our writing easy to read and our keywords on point, we might now have the opportunity to write more online!