- Factual knowledge
- Please describe, briefly, one new piece of factual knowledge that you acquired or developed so far in the course.
Rspo2, a protein known to interact with Wnt to activate β-catenin, is required for cranial, facial, and left hind limb development in mice.
- Please describe how you know that you have acquired or developed this piece of factual knowledge, and provide some evidence for it.
We were shown a figure from Yamada et al. (2009) paper which highlighted the type of information researchers can obtain from “removing something” experiments. The figure showed the differences in development between a mice strain which has WT Rspo2 and another strain with Rspo2 knocked-out. They determined that mice lacking Rspo2 had abnormal craniofacial development as well as poorly developed left hind limbs. The figure showed that Rspo2 is necessary for cranial, facial, and hind limb development in mice.
- Conceptual knowledge
- Please describe, briefly, one new piece of conceptual knowledge that you acquired or developed so far in the course.
I learned that there are four models to potentially explain how interactions between transcription factors and enhancers can mediate transcriptional silencing or activation. The four models are looping, tracking, linking, and facilitated tracking.
- Please describe how you know that you have acquired or developed this piece of conceptual knowledge, and provide some evidence for it.
In class, we were talking about distinctions between enhancers, silencers, and boundary elements. When we came to the topic of enhancers, it became obvious that enhancers can significantly distant from the genes they regulate and there must be a mechanism to transmit information from enhancer interactions to regulatory regions of genes. These models were necessary to describe how this information is transmitted.
- Skills
- Please describe, briefly, one skill that you acquired or developed/are developing so far in the course.
I’m beginning to develop a more critical and analytical perspective in terms of what I’m reading. When we go over figures in class, I am starting to analyze figures as in-depth rather than accepting it as what it is. I’m learning to question why the authors chose to do a certain experiment and their logic behind their experimental design.
- Please describe how you know that you have acquired or developed this skill, and provide some evidence for it.
Going over figures in class really helps me to develop a more analytical perspective on things. I have gone over many of the figures in class just like everyone has and sometimes it turns out that I understood some of the figure but maybe I missed on a minor point. Sometimes I may have even missed out on a critical point. Sometimes my fellow classmates will point out things that I didn’t see. I find this to be humbling but also really helpful because it makes me realize the level of attention and focus that is required in order to understand science papers properly. It’s also really good practice for whatever is coming next in my life.