Monthly Archives: March 2013

Big Data and Social Media: Where Are They Headed?

The information world seems abuzz with the possibilities big data and social media present. What’s more, the two are often related: social media often feeds the big data seekers, and big data often acquires life and meaning through social media. The impact that this relationship can have on our personal lives is potentially huge.

The benefits of such a partnership could take place on a scale and at a pace once only imagined. Consider the example of Deng Fei, a Chinese journalist and activist who leverages the power of social media to raise social and environmental awareness in China and to create change (Ford, 2012). In 2009, using Google Maps, Deng plotted 40 locations in China where cancer rates are unusually high and appear linked to the presence of chemical and other industrial plants perched alongside waterways (Millar, 2012). There are now approximately 100 such locations on the map (Brown, 2013). These areas quickly became known as cancer villages and the ensuing outrage amongst Chinese people has finally led the national government to author a five-year plan which proposes to regulate the use and disposal of 58 toxic chemicals (Brown, 2013). Another example of Deng’s social media savvy was his use of Weibo, “a Chinese Twitter-like service” (Ford, 2012), during the Chinese New Year, a time when city-dwellers return to their hometowns for celebrations. Deng asked his compatriots to snap pictures of their local creeks and rivers and to share them on Weibo (Brown, 2013). Images streamed in (sorry, couldn’t resist!) depicting polluted water bodies (you can see them here) and raising environmental awareness. The national government can no longer ignore these environmental issues; in fact, they are quickly becoming a top priority (Brown, 2013). These are hope-inspiring changes brought about by the partnership of big data and social media.

However, the relationship between the two isn’t always ideal. This year, for instance, Google’s Flu Trends suggested that “in mid-January, nearly 11 percent of the United States population had influenza” while more reliable estimates from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were 6 percent (Bilton, 2013). Since Flu Trends are based in part on “flu-related search queries in Google,” many researchers think that the search numbers may have been inflated by “widespread media coverage,” including “social media, which helped news of the flue spread quicker than the virus itself” (Bilton, 2013).

Torture numbers, and they’ll confess to anything. ~Gregg Easterbrook

What stories like this tell us, I think, is that we need to think more carefully about the nature of big data and its relationship to social media. How is data collected, manipulated, and used? Is it sufficient to simply regulate how data is used rather than what kinds of data are collected (Lohr, 2013)? We also need to distinguish between the following types of big data: “big dumb data” (data that doesn’t offer any insights), “big scary data” (data that is uses to stalk and pry), and “big useful data” (this speaks for itself) (Bloomreach, 2013). What kind of a role ought social media to play in helping us to judge data quality, advocate for privacy, and challenge/question data collection, storage, and dissemination methods?

I tend to feel torn by these questions, but of one thing I’m certain: our legal systems need to catch up, not just with technological trends and the growing desire to put everything online but also with economic and environmental issues.

Resources

Bilton, N. (2013, February 24). Disruptions: Data without context tells a misleading story. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/24/technology/big-data-and-a-renewed-debate-over-privacy.html

Bloomreach, J. K. (2013, March 19). Is your big data dumb, scary or useful? Wired. Retrieved from http://www.wired.com/insights/2013/03/is-your-big-data-dumb-scary-or-useful/

Brown, P. (2013, February 22). China cancer villages [Audio podcast]. As It Happens. Toronto, ON: CBC Radio. Retrieved from http://www.cbc.ca/player/Radio/As+It+Happens/ID/2338005092/?page=8

Ford, P. (2012, February 6). Once a top investigative reporter in China, Deng Fei now writes a popular microblog that moves readers to action. The Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved from http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Making-a-difference/2012/0206/Deng-Fei-goes-beyond-journalism-to-right-wrongs-in-China

Lohr, S. (2013, March 23). Big data is opening doors, but maybe too many. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/24/technology/big-data-and-a-renewed-debate-over-privacy.html

Millar, H. (2013, March 13). Cancer villages [Blog post]. WebMD. Retrieved from http://blogs.webmd.com/cancer/2013/03/cancer-villages.html

Can Social Media Help Save Endangered Languages?

Aside from taking one undergraduate course, I have never really delved into the world of linguistics, but I do enjoy languages. In my neighbourhood during the summer, tourists from other countries often mill about by the river or in the local park, conversing with one another in a variety of languages. It’s a joyful mix of sounds, tones, and cadences that reflects the diverse ways in which human beings experience the world. So, when I read predictions, such as those made by the UNESCO Atlas of the World’s Languages in Danger, which “estimates that half of the world’s spoken languages will disappear by the end of the century if nothing is done” (Meigs, 2011), I am disheartened.

As we know, North American indigenous languages “are now seriously endangered” (Gadelii, 1999), and despite the thoughtful and multi-pronged efforts of language planners, “our Native American languages [keep] dying” (Littlebear, 2010). But as one of my personal heroes, the acclaimed American linguist Joshua Fishman (2002) points out, most language revitalization programs simply focus on the language itself, rather than taking a big-picture approach of viewing languages as reflections of cultures and communities. Without a culture or community to support it, a language has little chance of survival (Fishman, 2002).

Here is where social media could prove to be an invaluable tool. Because “social media provide many or all seven of the functional building blocks of social life—identity, conversations, sharing, presence, relationships, reputation, and groups” (Kietzmann et al. as cited in Coronel-Molina, 2011, p.289), they can foster, to a degree, the kind of community and culture building initiatives that are required for language support. Moreover, social media increase the “functional domains” of a language (Coronel-Molina, 2012, p.279), those areas in day-to-day life in which the language is actively employed. “In general, the more public domains in which a language is used, the higher its status” (Coronel-Molina, 2012, pp. 279-80). This observation explains the focus of language planners on a language’s status: Only once the attitudes of speakers and potential learners shift from dismissive to appreciative does language corpus planning become purposeful, and language acquisition planning seem realistic (Schreyer, 2011). Social media, by placing endangered languages into more public domains, may help bring about these much needed attitudinal changes.

Those who know nothing of foreign languages know nothing of their own.

-Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

Current examples of social media at work include IndigenousTweets.com, which enables people to tweet and to follow other tweeters in any of approximately 100 indigenous languages (Meigs, 2011). Quechua and Aymara, indigenous languages of South America’s Andean region with 6+ and 2+ million speakers, respectively, have found new life in social media, such as YouTube, blogs, and Facebook (Coronel-Molina, 2012). Both languages are also appearing in Twitter tweets and in wikis (Coronel, Molina, 2012). In BC and Alaska, Tlingit speaking community members are using Facebook and video conferencing tools to practice their language (Schreyer, 2011). These are exciting developments, particularly as the “coolness factor” of social media could go a long way towards building a language’s prestige (Miegs, 2011; Schreyer, 2011).

However, social media does present some access problems: 1) there’s the digital divide to consider, and 2) typing in certain languages may present difficulties (Meigs, 2011). Additionally, the most avid social media users “often lack Native language fluency” (Meigs, 2011).

Despite these challenges, social media holds hope for those interested in and passionate about linguistic and cultural diversity. But because social media tools can never be as powerful as face-to-face communication and strong “real world” communities, I hope that these cyber realm initiatives lead to these languages and their related cultures thriving offline.

References:

Coronel-Molina, S. M. (2012). New functional domains of Quechua and Aymara:  Mass media and social media. In J. W. Tollefson (Ed.), Language policies in education: Critical issues (pp. 278-300). London, UK: Routledge

Fishman, J. (2002). Commentary: What a difference 40 years make! Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 12(2), 144-149. Retrieved from http://linguisticanthropology.org/journal/

Gadelii, K. E. (1999). Language planning theory and practice: An evaluation of language planning cases worldwide. France: UNESCO. doi 10.1.1.119.2871(3)

Littlebear, R. (2010, April 26). And still the languages kept on dying. Multilingual Mania: Cultivating a Multilingual World. Retrieved from http://multilingualmania.com/and-still-the-languages-kept-dying/

Meigs, D. (2011, June 14). Tweet hereafter: Social media is saving native languages. Indian Country. Retrieved from http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/article/tweet-hereafter%3A-social-media-is-saving-native-languages-37472

Schreyer, C. (2011). Media, information technology, and language planning: What can endangered language communities learn from created language communities? Current Issues in Language Planning, 12(3), 403-425.  doi 10.1080/14664208.2011.604965